This is a YouTube video titled "Training program analysis" containing a discussion between two speakers about evaluating and adapting training programs over a period of six to eight weeks, focusing on pain management and subjective improvement metrics. The speakers discuss how to assess whether a program needs changes based on client feedback and pain levels.
Hmm. So when, with your six to eight programs that you typically write out, what are some of the adaptations that you are hoping to achieve in that time? And then how do you evaluate whether or not a program needs to be changed or whether or not they just need to stick to the process?
Yeah. Yeah, Great question. I definitely want to give it some time, about four to six to eight weeks or so, to. To allow for those adaptation adaptations. And it depends on who I'm working with. If it's somebody who's coming in because they have back pain, I want to see that pain decreased. We might look to identify certain things that they do. Often if I'm working with somebody that sits in front of a computer and works in front of a computer all day, I want to know how much their pain is at the end of the day compared to when they first came in. We might identify some metrics, either give it a number on a pain scale or just more of a subjective thing where they tell me they're feeling a lot better and they're not having a lot of pain.
