Dennis Prager argues the Supreme Court should have heard Texas's lawsuit challenging the 2020 election, claiming Democrats had motive and opportunity to cheat through mail-in ballots and reduced poll watching. He contrasts this with past elections and criticizes the left's moral relativism and hostility toward religion and small business.
So it doesn't look like the Supreme Court— at least that's what the experts, including on our side, say— the Supreme Court will take the Texas and 18 other states' lawsuit. And it seemed to me to be a legitimate lawsuit. There, look, there was no question that there was cheating. The question is, was it determinative? The— this is something you must remember for the Democrats. There is motive, opportunity, and morality. That's all you need to do anything. The motive is to win the election. The opportunity is through vast numbers of mail-in ballots that can show up at any time. Is closing down poll watching for the evening while the president was winning. So there are many, many, and the number of anomalies are remarkable. First incumbent president to get more votes than he got the first time he was elected and lose. When was the last time a president won Ohio and Florida and lost? I'm serious. Do you know what, do you know the answer? It's not in, certainly '50 to '74. No, I know, I'd love to get the exact date. It would be fascinating to me. It's at least half a century. I mean, there were so many of those. So the first is, is there a motive? Second, is there an opportunity? And the third, is your conscience clear? Clean? And the answer is yes. If you believe, which every Democrat seems to, that the president is a neo-fascist, white supremacist, neo-Nazi dictator, why wouldn't you cheat? I would. I fully acknowledge it. I think you're morally bound to cheat if you can keep a white supremacist neo-Nazi dictator out of office, right? You're going to have to answer to God if you're in the polling business. You could have stopped a neo-Nazi white supremacist fascist dictator from gaining power and you didn't. Get it? So this notion of why we think we would do such a thing is absurd. Of course they would do such a thing. The question is, how much did they do it? That is the only question, and I don't know the answer. Hence my use of the term agnostic with regard to the results. I don't know, but I've never said that in my life, that I don't know. I haven't said it about a Democrat or Republican. Someone I was speaking to, I think it was my wife, which is terrible, you should remember when you spoke to your wife about something, said in retrospect, maybe Richard Nixon was wrong in not protesting the stealing of the election from him when John Kennedy won. Everybody today knows that the election was stolen by the Democrats in Illinois. And Texas? Is Lyndon Johnson there? Is that— yeah. The beauty of being on— there are many beauties apparently. There are many benefits being on the left. One is you don't actually have to do good to feel good about yourself. That's a truly A truly big benefit of being on the left. You have to feel good about yourself, and that's all that's necessary. And then you are— your conscience is cleared. That's part of the reason the left doesn't like religion, because religion says, uh-uh, you don't make up the rules. There's a God who makes up the rules, and that really annoys them. And then when it's added to the American message, God wants us free. The Liberty Bell has a verse from the Bible, from the Torah, in fact, Leviticus. Leviticus 25. I don't remember the verse, but it's Leviticus 25. And you shall proclaim liberty throughout the lands to all its inhabitants. Wouldn't that be nice if somebody in power said that? If somebody in power said what Franklin Roosevelt said, "We have nothing to fear but fear itself"? Every great message of the past has been trampled on. Now the message is we can crush tens of thousands of restaurants. Ruined their owners' lives, ruined the lives of all those who work there. Not because what they're doing is unsafe, but because we have the priority of keeping people at home. These are truly awful human beings, like this what's-his-name, like this Barbara Ferrer, and this, this guy here. Golly, they're really awful human beings, but they go to bed with a clear conscience. They get their salaries. You know, Barbara Ferrer, I believe, is over $400,000. $400,000, and she's useless. She's actually harmful to the state. So when you make $400,000 a year, it is quite possible for you to have no empathy or sympathy for people, the lowlifes who run businesses. The left hates the entrepreneur, hates the person. They don't emotionally hate them. They hate them insofar as their behavior is concerned. 'Cause they can't control small businesses. Nike is a left-wing organization. So Google is a left-wing organization, so the left loves the giant ones. Walmart is woke. Netflix is woke. But your local restaurant, that's an independent mind. 1-800-PRAGER-776.
Life, Legacy, and a Dangerous Mission in the Soviet Union | Sunday Fireside Chat
