Dennis Prager responds to a second assassination attempt on Trump, arguing that Harris's statement against violence was too vague and should have specified political violence. He questions how the assailant knew Trump's location and suggests an inside job is inevitable.
So the candidate for the presidency of the United States of America and a former president, a second assassination attempt is made, and this was what Kamala Harris said: I am glad he is safe. Violence has no place in America. Wow, that is, that's a moving statement, I have to say. That's it. We gotta— how about we gotta get to the bottom of this? It's very disturbing that somebody knew where the president, former president, would be. Yeah, well, gun control, that would be the logical statement. By the way, this is the statement: violence has no place in America. I'm not nitpicking here. It has nothing to do with her because a lot of people say this, both sides. I wrote a piece for the LA Times when I used to write for the Los Angeles Times when it still published conservatives. And it was so hated. I think it might have been the most hated piece I've ever written, that there was such a thing as moral violence and immoral violence. Which is so obvious. As I remember thinking, I'm going to write a column on the obvious, but I realized the obvious is what is denied by the left. This is an example. Violence has no place in America. Political violence has no place in America would have been more to the point, just for the record. The White House said President Joe Biden and Harris would be kept updated. The White House added it was relieved to know Trump is safe. No more passionate words have ever been uttered. Wow. 1-8-Prager-776. It's the, the, the idea that it was an inside job is so inevitable if you think about it. And that's, uh, that's the, that's the most worrisome factor here. How did he know what he knew?
Life, Legacy, and a Dangerous Mission in the Soviet Union | Sunday Fireside Chat
