Dennis Prager argues the NFL's plan to play both the U.S. national anthem and the Black National Anthem at the Super Bowl isn't divisive. He says the left's media narrative that frames opponents as divisive is what actually divides people.
Joe in California says we should call Super Bowl advertisers and say we won't buy their products. If it happened en masse, it would be great. I don't see it. I don't see it happening. This is about the NFL playing two national anthems, one for America and one for Black America. 'Can you think of a more divisive thing to do?' is a perfect example of the left using a term of which they are guilty. Who's dividing the country? People who want one national anthem played at the Super Bowl, or people who want two national anthems played? I'm expected to believe that the left is not the divisive force here. That it's the right wing that objects to it. That, that is what I'm told when you read the leftists who defend the Black National Anthem being performed at the Super Bowl. Oh, it's the right wing. Look at the divisiveness. I long ago asked, do leftists believe their lies? And I've come to conclude that they often do. You play two national anthems and we're the divisive force. Get it? That's what every single left-wing outlet states, everyone. I don't know of an exception. The ease with which they lie must be because they, they don't know they're lying. I play— I support two national anthems, and you who don't are the divisive party. Read my column today at DennisPrager.com or a town hall. On this very subject, two national anthems at the Super Bowl.
Life, Legacy, and a Dangerous Mission in the Soviet Union | Sunday Fireside Chat
