In this podcast episode Francis Wade expands on an article he wrote for the Jamaica Gleaner, arguing that companies that hire top‑tier strategy firms such as McKinsey, Bain, or BCG must hold a dedicated follow‑up planning session once the consultants leave. He explains that external consultants are valuable because they can dive deep into a narrowly‑defined problem on a short, intensive sprint, but they are not equipped to solve the full breadth of an organization’s challenges, their recommendations can become obsolete quickly (e.g., due to unforeseen events like a pandemic), and they cannot serve as the firm’s long‑term strategist. Consequently, Wade urges senior leaders to treat the consultant’s report as one input among many, to act on actionable advice immediately, and to convene an “after‑McKinsey retreat” where executives integrate, prioritize, and implement the recommendations while retaining ultimate strategic responsibility.
Chapters
Hi and welcome back to Chronicles From a Caribbean Cubicle Podcast. This is Francis Wade, and here's an article I wrote for the Jamaica Gleaner. It's entitled: Why You Need an After McKinsey Retreat. If your company is using an outside strategy consulting firm like McKinsey, what is the best step to take after they leave? If their expensive advice is so useful, why might you still require another planning meeting? Many of the most successful companies around the world avail themselves of the research services provided by firms such as McKinsey Company, Bain Company, and Boston Consulting Group . Their formula is often the same: a prospective client presents them with a difficult problem. To find solutions, they assemble a team of bright MBAs who tackle the issue in an intense 3- to 4-month sprint. Working long nights and weekends, they delve into their database of past projects and proprietary data, relying on the stellar advice of their global network of experts. Compared to the internal resources of the typical client, they have an unmatched ability to bring a firehose of assistance to a threatening blaze. However, don't believe for a second that they are providing a complete solution to your troubles. Instead, their final presentation is actually just the start. Here's why: 1. They solve narrow problems. An outside expert isn't geared to tackle a wide range of your company's complex issues. They agree to focus on a sharp, well-defined scope, a tight problem definition that is clear to both sides. Given their brief tenure, they define problems that can actually be solved in a short timeframe. Initially, it may seem strange to you, their client. The consultants appear to be trying to do less, actively resisting the temptation to do more. This sometimes leads to tensions. Some look at the huge price tag, $1 to $2 million US, and believe that at that level, every issue should be resolved by their high-powered team. But that's not how it works, with good reason. As expert problem solvers, they operate a bit like surgeons. Within their narrow specialty, they are called into crisis situations to tackle your organization's issues no one else can. They represent an immediate investment of time and energy to carry out a critical intervention. As such, it's unprofitable and unwise for them to "boil the ocean." Their value lies in their ability to go deep very quickly, not to understand a great deal of complexity. That's why, when their job is done, they need to walk away. They should never usurp the responsibility for the long-term health of the company. That should remain the primary job of you, the client. Likewise, the implementation of the recommendations should not be in their role. Number 2: Their solutions have an expiry date. An outside consultant's advice might be the best answer to a given problem right up until the date their intervention ends. After that, all bets are off. Case in point: If COVID-19 has taught us anything, it's the fact that dramatic disruptions do take place. Imagine if, after receiving a consultant's report, a pandemic were to break out. The unfortunate timing could render the contents meaningless. This is why it's critical for clients to act on specific advice immediately, never allowing it to languish. Does this mean that they should rush to implement the suggestions? Without question. Number 3: Outside experts aren't your company's primary strategist. Ultimately, the fact is that consultants can't understand the entirety of your business in just a few months. This means they shouldn't become your organization's chief strategist. That job remains in the executive team led by the CEO. Whether their recommendations confirm, deny, or augment prior wisdom, your senior managers should consciously incorporate them into their thinking. But there's a caveat. Not every recommendation they made is worth pursuing. Why? They simply cannot take into account all the factors necessary to lead your business into the future. As such, the chances of their report being completely correct are low, especially in the areas in which they tend to be weak: cultural differences, human resources, and change management. While their technical analysis might be on point, it won't be perfect. Turning their findings into something valuable requires some hard additional work regardless of the price tag paid. Your team's combined wisdom is needed to treat the expert advice as only a single input among many, an element of the organization's strategic management, but never a replacement. The final decisions remain in the hands of your executives. They must now plan a complete strategy, short and long term, that builds on the report. The first post-McKinsey meeting is therefore just the start of a new planning cycle, albeit one that has the advantage of some fresh insights. Thanks for listening. Do you have an unsolved problem in your Caribbean company related to strategy, productivity, engagement, or business process improvement? Just visit a searchable listing of all my prior articles and you may be able to help yourself to a fresh line of thinking. Go to blog.fwconsulting.com Or see the show notes.
