Kaberi Dutta ChatterjeeDirector, KAA Media · Narrative Architect | Director, KAA Media Inc.

'US military now has to prove these crafts are NOT ETs '

16 Aug 2023 · 15 min

Watch on YouTube

15:01

In this short YouTube dialogue, Speaker A argues that recent U.S. Navy video releases provide concrete data on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) that exhibit capabilities—such as Mach 20 speeds, underwater operation, and erratic maneuvers—far beyond known technology, thereby shifting the burden of proof onto the military to demonstrate these objects are not extraterrestrial. Speaker B counters, emphasizing that the evidence is insufficient for an extraterrestrial conclusion, urging caution and highlighting that "U" in UFO (now rebranded as UAP) merely denotes "unidentified" and does not imply alien origin. The exchange underscores the tension between presenting new data and maintaining scientific skepticism.

Chapters

Historically, when physicists were asked about flying saucers and UAPs and extraterrestrial civilizations, the bottom line is you have to have data. You just can't say that, gee, I saw something going across the sky last night. Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. But now we finally have data. The United States Navy has admitted that, yes, there are hours of videotapes, videotapes that can be analyzed to calculate the characteristics of these things. These things require technology beyond anything we have. The ability to fly up at Mach 20, the ability to fly underwater, the ability to zigzag. Now the burden of proof has shifted. The burden of proof is on the military now to prove that these things aren't extraterrestrial. That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying if you want to declare that, the evidence is insufficient to convince someone who's an authentic skeptic. You want it to be an alien, that'd be extraordinary if it's an alien. But it's just, it's a light doing things in the sky that you can't explain. That's why where the U comes from in UFO, or the rebranded I don't know why they rebranded it the UAP. Yeah. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. Who are they fooling? They mean UFOs. Unidentified Aerial Phenomena? Please, government, who do you think you're talking to? So we're all talking about the same phenomenon, stuff in the sky that you can't explain. Just 'cause you can't explain it doesn't mean they're visiting space aliens, okay? Just let's be clear about this.