The Speech That Rewrites History

Good afternoon, everyone. It's a pleasure to be here with you. I've been working on a thesis, uh, that will change the way humanity is seen. This has not been uncovered for 2,400 years. I call it the unified field of Civilization. The arc of civilization changes today. This thesis I've been working on is about 600 pages, and I decided that— and Wallace had requested that I present my thesis here to you today. The world— no one has seen this, has heard it, not even Wallace, my family. I've just been working doggedly at this. You will be— all of us here today will be the first to ever hear it, but once it's heard, it can't be unheard. Once it's seen, it can't be unseen. So going forward, the scholars, the academia, the historians are going to change how they view human consciousness and our history. So out of the 600 pages, I pulled about 25 pages of notes here that I'm going to work through, doing my best to give you the basic arc of civilization, the whole picture, without the deep research that goes behind this and the deep evidence. But I will give you enough to make it something that you can never forget, let's put it that way. And as I said, you are the first ever in civilization to hear, hear this change of the arc of history. So here we go. So a truth is buried under 2,400 years of misunderstanding. A truth that once revealed rewrites the entire story of Western civilization. A truth that shows why humanity has struggled, why force still rules the world, and why you sitting here today are the ones destined to complete the greatest arc in human history. Today you will see why Plato wrote what he wrote, why Aristotle's mind was something entirely new, why the world misused Plato to justify control, why consciousness never fully took hold, why the prime law is the final piece to the puzzle, and why Neovia Neo-Via is inevitable destiny. When this speech ends, you will understand yourself and your mission in a way that you never have before. Today, I will lift the veil. Before we go back 2,400 years, I want to go back 13.8 billion. At the beginning of the universe, at the first few seconds after the Big Bang, in the tiniest initial conditions that determined the laws of physics, the formation of matter, the birth of stars, and the entire evolution of the cosmos. A hair's difference, just a hair's difference, and the universe as we know it could not be. There could be no life in our universe. So now here's the breakthrough. Human consciousness has a Big Bang too. A beginning moment an origin point, a fragile developmental window in which the first conscious minds emerged from the fading bicameral world. And just like in the early universe, those early psychological conditions determined the trajectory of the entire human story. The laws of humanity—hierarchy, force, mysticism, authority, repression—were not inevitable. They were set in those early moments because the world misunderstood what consciousness actually was. Today you will fully understand it. And because of us, for the first time in history, humanity can rewrite its fatal trajectory. Going back 2,400 years, Plato lived in a world that was not fully conscious. And the evidence is everywhere. Let us begin with the revelation at the heart of everything. Plato was not writing for a world like ours. He lived in a moment in human development that modern psychology never understood correctly. But Julian Jaynes finally explained. The era of the fading bicameral mind. And the evidence is unmistakable. Jane showed that the bicameral mentality broke down between roughly 1200 to 800 BC. By Plato's birth in 427 BC, the breakdown was recent enough that full inner self-awareness was not universal. Consciousness was not universal. In fact, most people still reacted to authority the way the bicameral minds did. Myth, command, and obedience were still psychological defaults. Plato writes in a civilization only partially conscious. So now I'm going to take a moment. I'm assuming my audience here, you, my readers, are familiar enough with Julian Jaynes and the bicameral mentality because you've read my works and it's all throughout my works. But I'll just take a brief moment to just give you a surface treatment of what the bicameral mentality was. Going back 3,000 years, 3,000 to 10,000 years ago, our mentality was completely different than it is today. We had no inner mind space that we have today. We could not introspect. We could not think subjectively. We could not be self-leaders. We reacted to external stimuli. We were by far the smartest animals with the, with the largest brains, but we had not broken into our inner mind space. We followed external authority. External authority, uh, it was a hallucinatory command from your right hemisphere to your left hemisphere, thus bicameral, the bicameral mentality. Like all animals in nature, we would be guided by Mother Nature on what to do. Let's say you have a deer in the forest and a predator approaches. Well, the deer has a strong impression to turn and flee. That's Mother Nature communicating. To the deer. Now, human in the bicameral mentality would likely hear a voice, a voice of God. It was an audio hallucination in the right hemisphere of the brain, the creative right hemisphere, that sent a message that was heard in the left hemisphere. This is all described brilliantly and in depth in Julian Jaynes' The Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind and the Origin of Consciousness. In The Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, it's all explained. So, uh, humans would hear a voice that was Mother Nature guiding him. But because we were by far the smartest animal with the largest brain, we had developed language. So therefore, Mother Nature took it to another level that was far superior to just strong impressions. It was audio hallucinations, and you would get more detail, not just turn and run, but it might say, run to the cave and hide, run to the river and swim, go ahead and fight, you got this. You would hear the voice of God and you would obey. Obedience was the hallmark of the bicameral mentality, obedience. Now, you had large thriving civilizations forming. And in those civilizations, let's say, you have, say, the Pharaoh. The Pharaoh was more efficient at hallucinating the voices, at communicating with the gods. So he was considered the man-god. He was the voice of God. So when he would come out and speak to the masses, it was the command, it was obedience that you would follow that voice. The external authorities ruled by Camerlmann. So I'm not going to go deeper into that because you have read my material. A lot of you have read Julian Jaynes, but that just gives you a little surface treatment of what the bicameral mentality was that began to break down 3,000 years ago. So Plato's dialogues contain bicameral mind structures. In his Republic, Plato's citizens cannot think independently. They require rigid classes. They depend on guardians. This is all bicameral mentality. They must be guided by mythic stories. They must hear noble lies. They must be shaped from childhood. Now, this is not how fully conscious individuals behave. This is how transitional individuals behaved, the still bicameral individuals, minds not yet capable of autonomous reasoning. This is who Plato was writing to. Plato communicates through myths and allegories, the language of the bicameral. In the bicameral world, you communicated through story, through ritual, through authority. Through symbolic forms, through commands. Plato did too. His tools were necessary translations for a population not ready for pure logic. Plato was stabilizing a half-conscious society. Look, society could break down very easily in those times. You had some people who were semi-conscious, a very few who were actually conscious, and you had the masses who were still in the bicameral structure. And a bicameral structure could panic and overtake society very easily. They needed obedience, they needed command, they needed external authority, they needed the voice, the voices. And this is what Plato provided for stability. He was not designing tyranny. This is the huge mistake of history. He was preventing collapse. Ayn Rand called Plato the most evil man in history. Philosopher Ayn Rand, without access to Jaynes, judged Plato through the lens of a fully conscious world. To her, Plato's hierarchical republic looked like the blueprint for tyranny. And yes, indeed, tyrants misused it that way. But Plato was not designing oppression. He was stabilizing a population not yet capable of autonomous consciousness. Rand's error was chronological. She judged Plato as if he lived in a world of rational, sovereign individuals. He did not. He lived among semi-conscious minds still emerging from bicameral conditioning. His works were descriptive, not prescriptive. Once this is understood, Plato's role is transformed. Not villain, but transitional architect of early consciousness. To understand Plato's role, we must understand who came just before him, his teacher Socrates. Socrates wasn't simply a philosopher. He was the first fully disruptive conscious mind in a still transitional world, and the reaction to him was inevitable. Socrates forced internal decision-making. He forced it through his Socratic method, his questioning after questioning. The core stressor of early consciousness was decision-making. Jaynes explains that early conscious minds found decision-making overwhelming. Socrates' questioning method—why, how do you know, tell me why, I need to know why, I need to know how—well, that forced Athenians to confront internal contradictions instead of obeying tradition. This caused psychological shock. He destabilized bicameral era authority structures. When Socrates challenged the gods, he was challenging the remnants of the voices that once governed human action. He cracked the foundation of their worldview. A transitional civilization cannot tolerate a fully conscious disruptor. This is why he was executed. He wasn't killed for impiety. He was killed because he represented the next stage of the human mind before the world was ready. Socrates is the first martyr of consciousness. Now, from Plato's teacher Socrates to Plato's student Aristotle. And now the counterpoint. Aristotle wasn't opposing Plato. He was born into a more conscious environment. He was enjoying a conscious environment that Plato himself never had access to. You see, Aristotle grew up in Plato's Academy. This was the first consciously engineered environment in history. Debate, Dialectic, reason, observation, introspection, internal decision-making. Aristotle lived his entire youth in that atmosphere. Aristotle never used myths or allegories. Where Plato used myths, Aristotle used logic, categories, empirical observation. This is full consciousness speaking its own language. His writing assumes an audience capable of internal deliberation. Aristotle assumes autonomy, inner reasoning, consistent identity, principled choice. This is not transitional psychology. This is what consciousness looks like when it fully arrives. Plato wrote for transitional minds. Aristotle wrote for conscious minds. There is not a contradiction between the two. This was a succession, an evolving of the mind. Aristotle completed what Socrates and Plato started. Now I want to solve Aristotle's natural slaves mystery, one of the most misunderstood lines that has puzzled scholars for centuries. Aristotle's phrase, natural slaves was not a claim of inherent inferiority. It was a description of bicameral residuals, bicameral man, people who could not internally deliberate and acted only when commanded. Commanded. Remember, external authority, the voices, the command, the obedience. Of the bicameral mentality. They were not yet capable of autonomous self-direction. Aristotle lacked modern psychological concepts and terms, so he used the only words available: natural slaves. So there you have it. He saw a developmental divide, not a racial one. Natural slaves was simply an observational bicameral man in a partially conscious world. Now let's move on to Aristotle's greatest student, Alexander, who became the first military commander to consciously reason through battle rather than obey inherited bicameral rituals. His enemies fought bikamerally in rigid patterns and traditions. Alexander adapted. He improvised. He self-directed. He never lost a battle, which baffles historians. This young 20-year-old leaves and conquers the world. Never lost a battle against armies and empires far larger than his army. But now, now we know why. We've just answered why. Consciousness defeats bicameralism. It's far, far superior. It beats it every time. It's superior use of the human mind. Consciousness. So now the ark becomes undeniable. Why did Alexander never lose a single battle? Well, because he was the first world leader trained entirely in conscious reading, reasoning. Aristotle educated him in conscious integrated fashion. Alexander's mind was trained in logic and strategy and psychology and adaptation and observation. His enemies fought with bicameral style rigidity. They use strict formations, ritual repetition, predictable responses, command-based behavior. Command, command. Conscious adaptation destroys bicameral obedience every single time. Alexander proved this as he improvised, adapted instantly, altered tactics mid-battle. Red enemy psychology overwhelmed his enemy for a full decade as he took over two-thirds of the Western world. This was not luck. The historians can't put it together or understand how he did this. This was simply consciousness defeating bicameral tradition. That's all it was. Alexander is the world's first demonstration that conscious integration is decisively superior in real-world conflict. Alexander proved consciousness is far, far superior to the bicameral mentality. And yet, and yet, human course mistaking followed the bicameral path for 2,400 years. The historic catastrophe: misreading Plato and losing Aristotle. So now we come to the great historical tragedy. For over 2,000 years, Western civilization made a catastrophic mistake. They read Plato's transitional blueprint as if it were meant for conscious society, and they used his Republic to justify state control, authority structures, censorship, guardians, philosopher elites, technocracy, totalitarianism. Plato never, never intended any of this. His world required stabilizers, and that's what he provided. Ours does not. Plato created philosophical scaffolding for a civilization in psychological chaos. He was the stabilizer for a fragile emerging consciousness. His Republic was never meant as a template for fully conscious individuals like us. It was a temporary bridge. That's all it was. A bridge from Socrates to Aristotle. Yet history tragically mistook it for a permanent blueprint. This misreading held civilization back for 2,400 years and still holds us back today. You see, Aristotle's logic was supposed to replace Plato's hierarchy, but it never did. Aristotle discovered consciousness, identity, non-contradiction, reason, purpose, voluntary choice, and most importantly, Aristotle realized force removes voluntary choice and proceeds to destroy consciousness. This was all in Aristotle. He had it all, the entire picture, the constant in the early Big Bang of human conscious civilization, the constant that would send it on its correct course. But in the early moments of the Big Bang of consciousness, the Aristotle constant The conscious blueprint, it disappeared nearly forever. That brings us to the disastrous tilt of the early conscious universe, his lost works, the library fires, and the 1700-year silence. Before I launch into that, I want to just make this comment that just goes around and around in my mind. Aristotle actually provided the philosophical structure for a force-free civilization. The embryonic prime law, 2,300 years ago. But here's what happened. Aristotle wrote two sets of works, exoteric, which were clear accessible, powerful, beautiful writings. The scholars from his day say they were more beautiful than Plato's dialogues, that they were another level beyond Plato. They were meant to spread conscious reasoning to the common man. Every last one of those are lost. Excuse me. All his exoteric public works were lost. All of them. Then you have his esoteric works, his lecture notes. These are dense, cryptic, incomplete, and limited to the minds of scholars. These are all that survived, the esoteric works, and barely. These works were buried in cellars for centuries. And they deteriorated. Only a third of Aristotle's esoteric works ultimately survived. A third. A third. So the world never received the Aristotle it needed. When it needed him. The conscious universe was sent off course away from the much better conscious life into bicameral darkness. The Library of Alexandria fire destroyed some of his most important writings. What ultimately survived? Well, Plato's myths, they all are intact. But Aristotle's exoteric works, the clarity, all of it's gone. As I said, Aristotle's surviving works remain buried, deteriorating, rotting, eaten by worms for centuries. So imagine that. So meanwhile, the conscious universe drifted into the far inferior bicameral darkness. Plato shaped the church, shaped monarchies. Plato shaped totalitarian elites. Plato shaped collectivist ideologies. And because the world inherited Plato In the absence of Aristotle at the critical Big Bang, earliest explosion of consciousness, yes, the world inherited the Plato bicameral-like transitional blueprint without Aristotle's conscious one. This is what happened. This is what happened. Excuse me. This is the fatal imbalance that sent consciousness adrift tilted civilization to expand into 2,400 years of force-based, bicameral-like structures with all the darkness, all the death, all the loss of life that followed. Remember, force destroys volition. This is Aristotle's identification. Force destroys volition, which destroys consciousness, destroys value creation. Tragically, in the absence of Aristotle, the world clung to the misread bicameral-based Plato. The Big Bang constant of Aristotle was lost almost forever. And this explains why governments grew, authority expanded, mysticism persisted, tyranny returned, wars raged on, conscious life wiped out. Freedom never stabilized. Creation was thwarted. Civilization has been disastrously struck and stuck forever until now with Plato's transitional hierarchy. And this was never, never meant to be. Next, a towering figure entered history who tried to move humanity into full consciousness: Jesus. Jesus lived among the most bicameral strata of ancient society—peasants conditioned to external command, ritual, and purity laws. You see, parables, and Jesus spoke in parables to help the bicameral peasants activate internal consciousness. His ministry, his teachings were trying to bring the bicameral peasants through the leap into human consciousness, and it's evidenced by his speech, by his language. He used parables. You see, parables helped the bicameral peasants internally interpret. Parables bypass the bicameral obedience mechanism entirely, not the external commands, the rituals, the purity laws. It bypassed all that. And Jesus's central teaching was the conscious revolution itself. The kingdom of God is within you. This challenge was the psychological equivalent of pulling the prisoner from Plato's cave into the light. Jesus awakened internal agency, internal morality, internal responsibility, consciousness, and therefore He was executed for the same reason Socrates was: awakening consciousness in a population whose elites and their power depended on external authority. And I must add, Jesus's ministry powerfully contributed to the prosperity of Pax Romana. The greatest 200 years in antiquity. After Jesus's heroic effort to correct the course of conscious civilization, well, next came the final seal on the tragic and disastrous misinterpretation of Plato in the form of Augustine. This is One more figure I must bring into view before I take you into the modern story. Yes, Augustine, the man who more than any other cemented the tragic misreading of Plato that shaped the next 1,000 years of Western civilization and sank us and sank us into the Dark Ages. And he didn't do it maliciously. In fact, he did it brilliantly, but brilliantly wrong. Augustine inherited Plato without Aristotle. By Augustine's lifetime, 354 to 430 AD, Aristotle's popular works had been destroyed. His remaining treatises were unknown in the Latin West. The world had Plato, but not Aristotle. The intellectual balance was broken. The conscious universe was drifting into darkness. Plato was all Augustine had. So he absorbed the only philosophical system available, Plato's transitional framework, but without its original context. Unfortunately, Plato became to Augustine metaphysical truth, moral structure, political blueprint, spiritual hierarchy. He had no counterbalance because Aristotle, the first fully conscious philosopher, was missing. Augustine fused Christianity with misread Plato. Augustine took Plato's transitional system and merged it with Christian doctrine. External authority. Hierarchy. Obedience to higher orders. Suspicion of earthly life. Inner guilt as a moral compass. Salvation outside the individual mind. Truth descending from above. Individual autonomy seen as dangerous pride. This was Plato's Republic recast in theology in a conscious world. But unlike Plato's temporary scaffolding, Augustine's version became permanent doctrine. Plato's transitional architecture became the philosophical spine of Western religion and government, sending the conscious universe into darkness, drifting astray towards its destruction. Augustine turned a transitional bicameral sufficient system into conscious civilization's operating system. So what Plato intended as a stabilizer for a fragile semi-conscious population, Augustine turned into the church, the medieval hierarchy, the notion of rightful authority, the denigration of worldly life, the suppression of individual freedom, the moral suspicion of conscious autonomy. And because Augustine's synthesis became sacred It became untouchable. For a millennium, the West lived inside a Plato-Augustine echo chamber, with Aristotle's conscious correction never appearing. This is what locked civilization into force. The idea that society requires guardians, rulers, hierarchies, obedience to authority, submission to the state or the church. All of this has its intellectual root in Augustine's adoption of Plato's transitional framework. As eternal truth. This is not the fault of Plato. It is the fault of losing Aristotle following the Big Bang of consciousness, and then the tragic misunderstanding of Plato's historical context. Augustine's genius made the misreading Unbreakable. Unbreakable. Until now. Today we are breaking a 1600-year misunderstanding. Today we restore Plato's transitional purpose, Aristotle's conscious framework, James's psychology of Early Civilization and the Prime Law's Moral Completion. For the first time since Augustine, the West has a unified model of what Plato actually was and why force wrongly persisted for so long. Today, we are correcting the single most consequential philosophical misinterpretation in Western history. Today we are fixing— we are fixing our conscious universe. Now let's look at why Jaynes, Julian Jaynes, did not put together my unified arc of consciousness of conscious civilization. Why? 50 years ago, 19— almost 50 years ago, 1976. Nearly a half century has passed. Well, Julian Jaynes discovered in 1976 the psychological mechanism behind the ancient world: the collapse of bicameralism, the birth of introspection, consciousness. James brilliantly explained how consciousness emerged, but he did not extend that insight to political philosophy, long-term civilizational development, Socrates' conscious silencing, the misuse of Plato's bicameral suited philosophy, the burial of Aristotle's conscious writings, Alexander's consciousness superiority over bicameral conflict, Jesus' ministry of consciousness, Augustine's bicameral structure disaster, the emergence of bicameral force-based institutions, or the moral necessity of the purely conscious protecting prime law. He mapped the birth of consciousness, but he did not fully trace its implications through history. James did not understand the deep philosophical lineage, integrate Aristotle's psychology with his own, decode Plato's transitional structure, interpret Socrates' execution as a bicameral shock event, recognize Alexander as the first conscious general, or recognize the need for a new civilization. And why? Why? Because Jaynes was a psychologist. He was a psychologist. He was focused on the inner voice. He studied schizophrenics. He was not focused on the external civilization. James uncovered the mind's big bang, but he did not uncover civilization's big bang. That integration falls to me. And this answers why academia has dismissed Jaynes and why my integration ends that dismissal forever. For half a century, Julian Jaynes' theory has been the most ridiculed, dismissed, and misunderstood idea in academic psychology. Not because it lacked brilliance, but because it lacked integration. Academia attacked Jaynes because he didn't connect the bicameral breakdown to the history of ideas. He never showed that Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander fit perfectly, precisely into the psychological shift that he described. He separates psychology from philosophy. My works brings them together. And do realize that my talk today is an abbreviation, an abbreviation of a fully integrated arc of history in which I bring in even more evidence and eras and notable figures such as Thomas Aquinas and Copernicus, Galileo, our founding fathers, and so much more. It's a 600-page thesis. Jaynes provided mechanism but not the historical proof. He mapped the mind, but he didn't map, deeply map, civilization. My integration shows Plato as transitional consciousness, Aristotle as full consciousness, natural slaves as misidentified bicameral remnants, Socrates as the first conscious martyr, Alexander as the superior conscious general, library fires as misfortune, burial of manuscripts as loss, tragically losing Aristotle, losing consciousness, opening the disaster by camel-like obedience and force for 2,400 years. And more: Jesus as the conscious warrior. Augustine as the conscious freezer. History's greatest tragedy of turning Plato out of context. Force is the destroyer of volition and thus consciousness. 2,400 years of force and suppression, the predictable outcome of Plato. And in my non-abreviated thesis, I integrate all of religion and all of government into the arc of bicameral suppression versus conscious freedom. Freedom. This is the historical evidence Jaynes lacked. He never explained why consciousness took the course it did. Yes, James mapped how consciousness arose, why it stalled, why it derailed. Actually, sorry, he mapped how consciousness arose, but I mapped how it stalled, how it derailed, why Plato dominated, why Aristotle disappeared, why force persisted, why society became trapped. This is the explanatory power academia Demands. Jaynes' theory lacked predictive power. Academia asked, "If Jaynes is right, what patterns should we see in early civilization?" I show the patterns. Socrates equals disruption. Fits. Plato equals stabilization. Fits. Aristotle equals consciousness. Fits. Alexander equals conscious triumph. Fits. Plato's misuse equals force. Fits. So much more. I could go on and on. For the first time, Jaynes' theory now has predictive verification. Academia rejected Jaynes because they lacked a unifying framework. He didn't fully connect psychology, philosophy, theology, politics, war, anthropology, economics, ethics, human development. I connect them all. I reveal the unified field of conscious civilization that Jaynes glimpsed but never articulated. With my integration, Jaynes becomes unassailable. And it's about time. After half a century, Jaynes now becomes unassailable. I provide the historical evidence, philosophical continuity, explanatory power, predictive structure, civilizational coherence, and ethical implications. This is what the academia demanded for 50 years. This is what was missing, and this is what I now deliver. My integration gives Jaynes what he lacked: a complete civilizational model. Jaynes gave the world the origin of the conscious mind. I'm giving the world the origin of conscious civilization and the roadmap for its future. Through me, Jaynes becomes legitimate. Through me, consciousness becomes clear. Through me, Neovia— Neovia, our future prime law world— becomes inevitable. Inevitable. I'll mention here that my full treatment of the Ark of Conscious Civilization, my Unified Field of Conscious Civilization, will be uploaded on join neovia.com. That's joinneovia, all as one word, dot com, in a couple of weeks. There you will see my non-abbreviated full thesis. Now we come to the modern parallel that NeoThink members deserve to understand. The Wallace to Hamilton lineage mirrors Plato to Aristotle. Now let me explain. My father, Dr. Frank R. Wallace, stood in the role Plato once held. The world was not fully conscious. Mysticism was everywhere. Illusions dominated civilization. He revealed neotech. The most powerful deconstruction of illusions ever written. Neotech was analytic, not yet fully implementable. A diagnosis of bicameral remnants in the modern world. I grew up inside that environment. The first environment engineered for full integration, just as Aristotle grew up in Plato's Academy. I took the abstract idea system and transformed it into applied consciousness through NeoThink, through the Prime Law application, through the Twelve Visions Party, through political blueprints platform bylaws, through Freedom Cities, through Neovia and Immortalis. This is the same succession. Frank Wallace to Mark Hamilton is the modern Plato to Aristotle. And you, you NeoThink members, are the first generation ascending inside the new conscious environment, the new fully conscious environment. You are the first citizens of this purely conscious age that's unfolding. Now we come to the heart of everything, the prime law. The final completion of the mind's evolution. The Prime Law is not a political idea. Let that sink in. The Prime Law is not a political idea. That's far too limiting. It's not a policy, and that's far too limiting. It's not even a philosophy. It is the complete codification of the conscious mind, the prime law. It is Aristotle's ethics combined with Jamesian psychology, free from Platonic misapplication. Brought to life through neotech and delivered through NeoThink to build a force-free civilization. That's right, it took NeoThink, this wide-scope puzzle-building thinking paradigm, to pull together what remained hidden to all the scholars, all the philosophers and historians for 2,400 years. This unified field of human consciousness. Through NeoThink, we pulled together the puzzle pieces. Through NeoThink, now, the prime law is the morality of consciousness. The end of the force-based bicameral world. The beginning of the fully free conscious world. Nothing like it has ever existed throughout all history. The Prime Law. And this brings us to the inevitability of everything that came before, and now the destiny of everything hence. That's Neo-Via. Neo-Via, the civilization that Plato could not build, Aristotle could not create, James could not foresee, my Father could not yet manifest, now falls into my hands, into our hands. A prime law civilization. A fully free, fully conscious civilization. Neovia. Neovia. Neovia is Latin for new way or new path. We've been following Plato's path of external authority for millennia. That changes with Neovia. A civilization where force is impossible, innovation is limitless, biotech cures accelerate and end all diseases, aging ends, entrepreneurs soar, crime evaporates, minds expand, individuals thrive. A civilization designed around full consciousness. The world Aristotle envisioned, that Plato glimpsed, that Jaynes explained, that Wallace prepared, and Hamilton activates, and Neovia becomes. Neovia is not optional, my friends. It's not optional. I am standing here today to tell you it is inevitable. Inevitable. It is the next step in the 2,500-year evolution of the human mind from Socrates to the Hamiltons. It's our destiny. So NeoThink members, you are not observers. You're not observers. You are participants, participants in the final step of human evolution. I want you to feel that. You're participants. You are now the first fully conscious individuals. You now are the first to see through the illusions of our history. You're now the first to understand the 2,400-year bicameral to consciousness arc. You're the first to know the true purpose of the Prime Law. You're the first to grasp the civilization that must come next: NeoVIA. It's not a dream. It's a logically inevitable outcome. It's going to happen. It's unstoppable. The world, the world is waiting for us. You see, You are at this place at this time for a reason. You're here, you're in the society, you found your way here. It wasn't by accident. I've said it many times, you are the searchers of the world. I found you through extensive work, matrixes and algorithms. I found you. And I wrote to you personally and you responded because your child of the past is still searching and you responded. So you're being here now. There's a reason you're here at this place at this time. You are the rare civilization shifters. You're the rare civilization shifters from force to freedom. That's you. That's you. Now, for you to move forward, and I mean really, really move forward, Listen closely to what I am about to say. The bicameral man feared consciousness, and you must learn from that. Julian Jaynes explains the early consciousness came with a terrifying new burden: self-responsibility. Which brought uncertainty, error, guilt, internal conflict, fear. The bicameral mind that was always comfortably hearing divine commands, well, now making its own decisions, felt like horror, horror, horror. The emerging conscious mind feared consciousness itself. Think about that. The emerging conscious mind feared consciousness itself. In Plato's cave, fear of the light meant fear of consciousness. In the cave allegory, when a prisoner first turns toward the light. He is blinded. He recoils. He resists ascent. He wants to return to the shadows, to the comfort. Plato writes that he would be "distressed and angry." Plato said he would "turn back to the shadows, believing them clearer than the light. A transitional philosophy. No, no, no, this is not a metaphor. No, this is psychology. This is psychology. The light is consciousness. The fear of the light is the bicameral fear of self-determination. The masses in the cave, they're not ready for consciousness. They are afraid of it. Now pay close attention. Let's look at today's parallel: the mortal Mentality. Today, people are stuck in routines where stagnation grows as they grow older. They live in value production rather than value creation. They live in repetition and routine ruts, jobs that drain them, patterns that shrink their world, boredom as they grow older. Now, as stagnation deepens, so does their quiet acceptance of death. Oh, so quiet. The human mind is not built for stagnation. It cannot bear endless repetition, the stagnant routine rut. It just can't. The human mind just can't because it was made. It was made for creation. So it just can't go into eternal stagnation. It just can't. And Plato's path has been eternal stagnation for the human race. So people in the mortal mentality and their stagnant routine ruts, well, they know, they know They know they must eventually die. They know it. They know it because they cannot imagine living indefinitely inside of suffocating stagnation. Hey, we've all been there. We all know what that is. Being honest with ourselves, we all know what that is. We all know what the cave is. In fact, most of us are still in the cave. And it's comfortable. It's comfortable, and the shadows are clearer than the light. Today, people in the mortal mentality, they equate extended life with extended stagnation. This is what I call the mortal mentality. Now listen closely. This is for you. What I'm about to say, this is for you. The mortal mentality fears the idea of living well into their hundreds and beyond, not because a rejuvenated body cannot do it, because we're getting to the science now where this is going to happen. But it's not because of that. It's because the mind is trapped in stagnation and we cannot endure the thought. We won't, we won't consciously realize it. It's all subconscious, all unconscious. Buried in our right brain, our right hemisphere of our brain. You can't live on forever. You can't live into your hundreds. Just as the bicameral man feared consciousness, modern man fears longevity. And through my decades, I I have demonstrated and proven this over and over again. But there is another mentality emerging today— today, here, today and yesterday— one as different from the mortal mentality as consciousness was from the bicameral mind. I call this the immortal mentality. We've been talking about that. Wallace has been talking about that the last two days. The immortal mentality. The immortal mentality appears when man lives not on routine, but on his essence. Say it with me. Value creation. That's his essence. Value creation. And this is what you're learning here. This is what my writings are all about. This is what Neotec prepared me to prepare you. Value creation. Our minds were not made to repeat. They were made to create. To create. When a person lives from that essence, as a creator instead of a mere producer, stagnation cannot take root. It can't grow. In its place grows abiding happiness, expanding meaning, open-ended purpose, continuous growth and excitement. A natural desire to keep living. Abiding happiness, it's not luxury, it's not a luxury. It's the fuel, it's the fuel of extended life. Abiding happiness. This is the immortal mentality. The immortal mentality does not fear longevity. It welcomes it. It even craves it. Now, I know some of you have felt this. Some of you have that immortal mentality already, and you have felt this. You crave this. You belong to Immortalis. Join immortalis.com, and the US and Argentine version of Immortalis is Neovia. Where our biggest leads are happening right now, the US and Argentina. So joinimmortalis.com. Many of you are original citizens. What do we call them? The OG? OFMs. OFMs, original founding members. A lot of— so a lot of you know this, you crave this, you crave longevity. You don't want to let go of your life because you're You're involved in value creation because value creation is aligned with the mind's true nature. What Aristotle tried to give us over 2,300 years ago, the first great leap, the first great leap in human psychology was from the bicameral mind to consciousness. The second great— the second great leap is from the mortal mentality to the immortal mentality. And in both cases, fear guards the gate. Do not forget that fear guards the gate in both leaps of humanity. Fear guards the gate. The old mentality clings to its shadows. The new mentality, the new reality, it just seems overwhelming. They won't walk into the light. They resist it. They want the comfort, what's comfortable. Or we won't leave our stagnant ruts because we shrink back to what's comfortable. The familiar prison feels safer than the unfamiliar freedom. Ancient man feared consciousness and retreated into the comfort of the cave. Modern man fears immortality and retreats into the comfort of the routine. But once the leap is made from bicameral to consciousness. I mean, just look at the difference. And now when the mortal mentality leaps to the immortal mentality, well, life becomes just far better, far, far better, more than we can glimpse, more than we can imagine. The, the old mind, it It just can't fathom the new mind. It's a leap. It's a leap too far to see what's on the other side. So now I'm talking to you again directly. I do not want you to fear it. I do not want you to fear the immortal mentality. Look, I'm not saying don't fear immortality. I understand, I understand. But get yourself to a point through value creation, through what you're learning here over the past 2 days. Get yourself to the point to where you are feeling so exhilarated, the stagnation is just sloughing off. And you're just so exhilarated that if someone said, okay, your time's up, it's time to die, you go, ho ho ho, no, no, no, no, hold on here. Hell no, I'm not ready. Fine, I'll give you another 5 years. 5 years from now, you remember what Wallace was saying earlier, how when you go into this, this exhilaration and how it expands and how you carry this light around you like Jesus did. And how those around you are drawn toward your gravitational pull and you see your loved ones rising with you. Well, hell, hell, 5 years from now when the Reaper comes, you're going to go, ho ho ho, hold on there now. I'm not ready. No, I'm not ready. And then you're going to go another 5 and another, and then the farther you go, the further you go forward, the more you will crave life. I guarantee that. I guarantee it. But I understand not everyone is there yet to really grasp the unforgiving tragedy of the death of human life. And as I said last time, or yesterday, uh, on my, um video, that, that is the greatest negative that I'm out to remove, is human— the death of human life. So, Neovia. Neovia is the civilization built for the immortal mentality. This is where all of you, where all of you belong. Neovia, it's built for the immortal mentality, for the value creator, for men and women who have stepped out of stagnation into their creative essence and are finally ready to live. Today you will be given what you need to ascend into the immortal mentality and its level 3. Wallace mentioned to you yesterday where life becomes so damn good, you will want more and more of it. What was it? Michelangelo slammed the knee and he said, "Speak," and cracked the knee, but that's part of the famous sculpture is the cracked knee. Right. Well, I say, "Live!" Live! On your essence. So I implore you, do not let fear keep you as a prisoner of the cave of shadows. Oh, believe me, most of us are prisoners in in that cave of shadows. I've spent my life associating with the prisoners, all my life. That's why I have such a deep emotional reaction to what has happened to our humanity since the Big Bang. Of conscious civilization. Even if we do not know it, we can all sense the comfort in the familiar. We can all sense that. So I am asking you to be brave. Be what life is all about. Level 3 will take you into the light where civilization was always meant to be. For the past 2,400 years. And I personally guarantee you, once you courageously, courageously step into the light and ascend, your life will become so much better, so much better, you have no idea. And I'll be waiting for you in Level 3. And I guarantee you a life beyond anything you can imagine now. It's the life we were for 2,400 years meant to have. All the lives lost, all the deaths, all the suffering, all the sadness. Should have never happened, and we are going to change it. I want you to join me as soldiers in Level 3 because we can remove the 2,400 years of force, and we can make this an incredible world for ourselves first, then our families next. We can save those who are suffering. We can save the world. And I don't mean that in such a, you know, silly, big overstated bullshit way. I mean that in line with reality. We are the ones who can do this. If you have family members who are suffering or struggling, you can save them. And we are to come together as soldiers in Level 3. I want you to be strong. I want you to be fit. Fearless. I want you to be fearless for you. I want you to be fearless for me. I want you to join me in Level 3 so we can do this together. I want to fix conscious civilization that has gone astray for 2,400 years, and we can do this together. We will fix ourselves, and then we will fix the world. And with that I want to thank you. I'll be waiting for you in Level 3. Join me. And I want to thank you. Thank you. You are the first to have ever heard the Unified Field of Conscious Civilization. Look for it in a couple weeks on joinneovia.com, the full thesis. That's when the world will find out about it. That's when the academia will finally accept Julian Jaynes. And that's when the course of history, the tilt of the conscious universe, is redirected back to the prime law consciousness where everyone lives life that was meant to be lived. Thank you. Good night.