Moral subjectivists say stealing to feed a starving child might be okay depending on context. Moral absolutists say stealing is always wrong, no matter what. The difference comes down to whether morality depends on circumstances or stands on its own.
Now, one of the things that you would deal with as you spread the gospel is people that don't believe that morality should come from any objective source, meaning that morality should be relative. I'll give you an example. People that are morally subjective, if you ask them, is stealing wrong? They're gonna say, well, it depends. Moral relativity or subjectivity would say, if somebody steals to feed a starving child, that's okay, right? We're moral absolutists. We believe that even if somebody steals to feed a child, stealing is still wrong.
