POV: analizando por qué se cae la camapaña más rentable de una tienda online

8 Jul 2026 · 1 min
0:47

In this informal, conversational analysis, Pau Escrig Felis examines why a previously top‑performing ad campaign for an online store collapsed. He points out that the campaign relied on five creatives that were essentially identical, with most receiving almost no budget. The only creative that was actually delivering results featured a reference to "Leo Messi" and was eventually exhausted ("burned out"). Because the other creatives had never been properly funded or tested, the account was left vulnerable when the winning creative stopped working, leaving the advertiser "in their underwear". Pau recommends opening a dedicated test campaign that allocates budget across a variety of distinct creatives, ensuring continuous testing and preventing a repeat of the same failure.

Chapters

More from Pau

0:35
youtube.com

Lo que consigues si haces email marketing de manera correcta

1mo ago
11:37
youtube.com

Rebajas: la trampa en la que caen los ecommerce

1mo ago
0:31
youtube.com

¿Mantengo activa la publicidad si me voy de vacaciones?

1mo ago
0:27
youtube.com

Qué hacer cuando tienes un conjunto de anuncios ganador

1mo ago
34:53
youtube.com

Cómo escalar tu tienda de joyas a +15k/mes (paso a paso)

1mo ago
0:21
youtube.com

Por qué no existen meses malos para muchas tiendas online

1mo ago
0:32
youtube.com

Cómo gestionar las campañas de testeo en META

1mo ago
26:27
youtube.com

Cómo escalar una tienda online de papelería

1mo ago
0:38
youtube.com

Cómo configurar el pop up para hacer sms marketing

1mo ago
0:37
youtube.com

Cómo sacar conclusiones de un anuncio ganador

1mo ago
0:42
youtube.com

Cómo interpretar el ROAS de tus anuncios

1mo ago
See all content