This article (Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2008) by David De Cremer and Constantine Sedikides examines whether procedural fairness (operationalized as voice vs. no-voice) communicates information about individuals’ reputation and how that reputational information affects personal and relational self-esteem. Across four studies (Study 1: N=77; Study 2: N=181; Study 3: N=69; Study 4: N=44), the authors found (a) procedures have reputational implications (Study 1), (b) concern for reputation moderates the effect of procedural fairness on personal self-esteem (Studies 2–3: stronger effects for high reputational concern), and (c) violations of procedural fairness reduce relational self-esteem more for positive-reputation than negative-reputation individuals (Study 4).

Questions this document answers

10.1080/01973530701866557

01 January 2008

Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30:66–75 (2008)

Study 1 N=77; Study 2 N=181; Study 3 N=69; Study 4 N=44

More from Prof.

PDF

AI_and_Ethics-Manifesto_Davidetal.pdf

2y ago
PDF

AIandEthics_2022_De Cremer_Article_WithAIEnteringOrganizationsRes.pdf

2y ago
PDF

APBR2017_Bang_ When new product development fails in China mediating effects of voice behaviour and .pdf

2y ago
PDF

article jesp van dijk et al 2004[1].pdf

2y ago
PDF

BASP2004_RuiterDave_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

BEQ2010 _Dave Eric Madan_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

BookSocPsyEconomics2006.pdf

2y ago
PDF

chapter2010managerialethics.pdf

2y ago
PDF

Cremer-Schutter2021_Article_HowToUseAlgorithmicDecision-ma.pdf

2y ago
PDF

Dave-Eric_JESP_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

DaveHugo_EJSP2004_.pdf

2y ago
See all content