Research article by David De Cremer and Eric van Dijk examining how group identification level, social value orientation, and performance feedback affect contributions in a public goods dilemma. The authors test the goal-transformation versus goal-amplification hypotheses, finding that strong group identity increases cooperation (particularly among proselfs) when no feedback is given, but when feedback is provided a salient group identity causes increased contributions after group failure (and personal identity leads to decreased contributions); success feedback shows no identity differences.

Questions this document answers

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (2002), 435–442.

David De Cremer (Department of Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University) and Eric van Dijk (Leiden University).

Received 8 August 2000; received in revised form 26 October 2001.

N = 142 undergraduate students (84 male, 58 female), mean age = 19.07 years (SD = 1.25).

Each participant received 300 cents; group provision point = 1050 cents; if reached the group total was multiplied by two and split equally.

More from Prof.

PDF

AI_and_Ethics-Manifesto_Davidetal.pdf

2y ago
PDF

AIandEthics_2022_De Cremer_Article_WithAIEnteringOrganizationsRes.pdf

2y ago
PDF

APBR2017_Bang_ When new product development fails in China mediating effects of voice behaviour and .pdf

2y ago
PDF

article jesp van dijk et al 2004[1].pdf

2y ago
PDF

BASP2004_RuiterDave_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

BASP2008_De Cremer _ Sedikides_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

BEQ2010 _Dave Eric Madan_.pdf

2y ago
PDF

BookSocPsyEconomics2006.pdf

2y ago
PDF

chapter2010managerialethics.pdf

2y ago
PDF

Cremer-Schutter2021_Article_HowToUseAlgorithmicDecision-ma.pdf

2y ago
PDF

DaveHugo_EJSP2004_.pdf

2y ago
See all content