Stop mitigating risk. Start avoiding it entirely.

14 May 2026 · 0 min

Watch on YouTube

0:24

In this brief YouTube dialogue, Speaker A argues that it is preferable to eliminate risk entirely rather than merely mitigate it. They propose that maintaining mutually agreed, authenticated records—a single source of truth—reduces the need for interpersonal trust because the facts themselves become self‑verifying. Speaker B echoes this, noting that if the data are reliable and authentic, one does not need to trust the other party’s testimony. The conversation concludes with Speaker A emphasizing that confidence should be placed in the solution’s design, integrity, and robustness rather than in individual assurances.

I guess it's a bit like risk, isn't it? If we can just avoid the risk altogether, then that's better than attempting to mitigate it. And if we've got really good records that we've both signed up to as a single truth, then maybe we don't have to actually dabble in too much trust in that because it's inherent in how we've established ourselves. And that goes for writing the appropriate things that meet our expectations.
So you're suggesting if they're authentically if they are reliable and they are the facts, then I don't have to trust you when you tell me that X happened because we both agree that those, those are the facts.
Yeah. So we can avoid having to— yeah, sort of built in, isn't it? So we trust in the solution. We trust that the solution's operated well and it's, it's, it's, you know, it's got integrity to it. It's robust.