The data points that actually improve project performance

14 Jun 2026 · 1 min
1:07

In this segment of William Doyle MRICS’s YouTube video, two speakers discuss how contract clauses—specifically under NEC3—are interpreted in practice. They illustrate the point with a training‑course case study about a specification change for cherry‑tree species. Rather than undertaking a costly time‑and‑motion study to determine the defined cost of the change, the project manager and contractor may simply agree on a comparable tree, recognizing that the administrative cost of a formal analysis could exceed the benefit. The dialogue highlights the usefulness of such contract provisions, while also warning that hidden “loss‑leader” clauses can undermine project performance if not kept in mind. The overall message stresses the importance of balancing formal contractual mechanisms with pragmatic, cost‑effective decisions to improve project outcomes.

Chapters

More from William

1:02:20
youtube.com

Episode 11 NEC4 Webinar Series - Communicating Correctly

1mo ago
1:02:21
youtube.com

NEC4 Clause 13 Explained: Communicating Correctly | Gather Webinar

1mo ago
1:00:18
youtube.com

NEC4 Communication Done Properly

1mo ago
0:57
youtube.com

Project Documents in Gather | Organise Files with Folders

1mo ago
1:01
youtube.com

Construction Weather Data, Linked to Every Shift Record | Gather

2mo ago
1:29
youtube.com

AI for quantity surveyors

3mo ago
0:32
youtube.com

Costain stopped treating subcontractors like outsiders

3mo ago
0:46
youtube.com

The tool Costain's QS team refused to give up

3mo ago
0:21
youtube.com

Why your site team and QS team keep missing each other

3mo ago
0:20
youtube.com

The commercial edge nobody talks about

3mo ago
1:06
youtube.com

Search first. Ask questions later.

3mo ago
See all content