Should Wedding Photographers Get Rid of Hourly Packages?

8 Sept 2026 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

0:56

In this YouTube discussion, Jamie Wolfer and a guest examine the entrenched practice of offering wedding photography services in fixed hourly packages (e.g., 6, 8, 10, 12 hours). The guest argues that the industry blindly clings to these structures and should move toward more flexible or "unlimited" models. Jamie acknowledges the sentiment but points out that most couples still seek a clear, hour‑based framework to compare options and feel guided through the decision‑making process. He stresses that photographers need to maintain a conversational approach to explain why they might abandon hourly packages, and that any shift must still address client expectations for structure and transparency.

Chapters

But I just feel like the entire photography industry, and I used to be this person, blindly accepts the 6, 8, 10, 12-hour package structure. And I would love to see that structure go because I don't think it's actually a good way to structure or offer your packages.
Like, I get the sentiment, and if you wanna price or package yourself in that way, that's fine. Most couples are still gonna come to you and say, how many hours can we have you for? My clients need a little bit of structure to cling onto, especially if they've never done this before. They need a little bit of a rudder, a little bit of direction to go like, okay, how can I compare this unlimited photographer You know, to a photographer that's eight hours, but the unlimited photographer is like three thousand dollars more. You're still gonna have to have a conversational experience with them to say like, "Here is why we don't do hourly structures." Also, what am I gonna be doing at home sitting on my couch? Yes, yes, absolutely, one hundred percent, without a shadow of a doubt, yes.