Two sponsors evaluate a project differently. Land Shark kills it because the 20% ROI doesn't meet their threshold, while Sicily still wants to move forward. Sponsor requirements, not the project itself, determine whether it lives or dies.
This is a no-go. Why is it a no-go? Can anybody tell me why it's a no-go?
Is anybody here? Just us? Yeah, I'm here. So, Andy, what to do? Is this a no-go?
For Land Shark, not for Sicily. It's a no-go because of parameter. What's the ROI?
What's the ROI? There you go.
What's the ROI put into it, right? So like we could, Still around 20%, maybe. So that's why it's a no-go for Land Shark. But you're looking for— correct.
