Chinese Women Beat Indian SWAT And It Tells Us Everything About the China-India Power Shift

Hello everybody and welcome to Geopolitical Trends, where truth matters. The Chinese all-female SWAT team just walked into Dubai a few, few days ago. They outrun, outshot, outclassed all male Indian squad in front of the entire world, and most people completely missed what that actually means. In the picture of the geopolitical landscape and the tensions between India and China vis-à-vis next war in Asia. This is exactly what I'm going to be providing you in this analysis. I'm going to deep dive into the shifting military and geopolitical balance between China and India, which was all to me personally was sparked by this Chinese all-female SWAT team outperforming Indian competitors at the UAE, United Arab Emirates SWAT Challenge in Dubai. So what I want to add into these discussions is sort of to explore with you what this result reveals about the broader capability gap, the lessons learned from the Pakistani use of Chinese weapons against India during Operation Sindoor, the reliability of the US backing for India, which I doubt anyway, and whether India could realistically sort of withstand a direct military confrontation with China. So I have to bring this kind of issues to the forefront. So, but first, let me sort of break down for you what is going on, so just we have a better understanding. First of all, India does not have a female a squad or a female squad team. So that's why there was only the male, uh, I think I have a picture here for you, the male team, uh, the Indian squad team. Those are the Indian team here, the male ones, some, because they don't have a female. The other thing is there has been some controversy regarding that this claim is faked and misleading and all that stuff. It was a viral video, was apparently altered with different voiceover and so forth. To them, they're saying there is no evidence that the Chinese female SWAT team completely, uh, or competed directly, uh, against the Indian male team. However, the record with some video footage from elsewhere, which I'm going to provide you the link from the competition does show the Chinese female SWAT team visibly outperforming the Indian team in the same event. So remember, we're talking about obstacle course crossings here. We're talking about better coordination. We're talking about a more accurate shooting. We're talking about this kind of type of activities. This is not a hand, uh, fist to fist or fight or, and so forth. No, no, no, no. This is why I wanted to bring this to you, and based also on your request. 72% of you, when I did the survey, 72% of you wanted me to address this topic. This is why. But for me personally, this is from a much bigger picture. So the— in sort of, there are those who saying, uh, sort of the Indian team outpaced the Chinese women team in speed, coordination, and shooting accuracy. But that's different from what the records show. So I'm going to send you a link here. You can— because I know certain information was altered inside India before I made it out. It's like what happened with the Tejas plane that just went down, that China— I mean, India is staying quiet about it, which I will talk about in a minute. So there is an apparent real footage of this, not a fabricated one. So where the challenge was, as far as how some might categorize it differently, is that the framing of it. So that it was some sort of a direct head-to-head matchup. No, it was not in that, in that setting. What it was, it was the idea of that the underlying performance gap appear to be genuine. In other words, the video footage of the competition does show the Chinese female SWAT team visibly outperforming Indian team in the same events. And I'm gonna— and by the way, just to let you know, the Chinese team also defeated the Americans in one specific event, and I'm going to show you the clip for that. So it's not just the Indian here, it's, it's the, the Americans. The reason I wanted to address it this way, because of the geopolitical tensions that exist between China and India. That is the reason why I wanted to do this. So let me first, uh, uh, send, share the link with you, then we'll continue in our conversation. And here is the— I'm going to share the footage right now in the screen with you so you can see. And I think I'm going to, uh, sort of mute this one here because there are some sound and YouTube doesn't, uh, like this one here. So here is the, the female one here. All right, take a look at Or take a listen. This is the American team, and this is the Chinese at the top right there. This is the Ameri— once again, the Chinese defeated the Americans in this event. Okay, I just wanted to share this with you here so we'll have a better understanding, at least for what we're talking about here. So I'm gonna share another clip, uh, if I can get to it here. Okay, I do. Let me share it here with you. Remove this one and we put another one. Okay, share screen. All right, let's take a look at this one here. Let me put it in the screen for you. There we go. All right, let's take a look at this. Once again, I'm going to silence this because they are soundtrack. This is the Chinese team at the top right there. You look at the speed, the accuracy, the precision in the shooting and the obstacles and so forth. And this is where it says right there, Chinese women's SWAT team wins against Indian men. This is the shooting part, the accuracy. There's the first target down, second one down. That's the female standing position shooting. From a standing, and he nailed it. Here is the moving targets. So there's one, there's a Chinese at the top, and, and a fifth right there. All right, I'm gonna stop right here. It's because I, I have a lot to cover, uh, I just wanted to share this with you for you to see where things are, that there is real footage for, for, for what took place. So now the big question, and I'm going to move into the geopolitical picture here. Does this win for the Chinese female SWAT team reflect the current geopolitical picture when it comes to China and India? Given the border disputes. Like I always said, I said this for so many years and still stand by my statements that China— if India was interested in really solving any disputes with China, it will sit down and resolve the border issue. But India will not do it. That's why it is my recommendation that Beijing should not trust India completely. I mean, should not trust them, period. And this is where this event that took place in Dubai, the Chinese female, the SWAT, comes into the picture as far as the geopolitical part of it. It sort of maps onto the real geopolitical dynamics. Just from a different angles. So what is genuinely reflecting the broader picture is that China has systematically, has been systematically investing in elite military and paramilitary training for decades. And this with a particular emphasis on the international showcases, like exactly what happened. So perform, performance like this one in Dubai that took place in Dubai is part of China's deliberate soft power projection. And that makes more sense because what China wants, wants the world to see its security forces, including female units as world-class. And they are. I was in China. I saw sometimes when I used to go through the subways and metro and you see some security, units moving around. They're moving with purpose. There is some sort of discipline. You can just tell it's world-class. Their uniforms are sharp. You know, there is no— we're talking about, you know, a reflection of where things are. So, and this is where the United Arab Emirates SWAT challenge is exactly the kind of a stage Beijing values the most because it reflects on that. India, by contrast, has struggled with persistent, and I mean it, persistent gap between its military size and its military modernization. Look just what happened with Pakistan or the down of the Rafale jets and so forth. Because to India, It fields one of the largest armies in the world because it has a large army, of course, but it has faced chronic issues with equipment procurement delays, bureaucratic inertia, and training standards. In other words, their training standard is so pathetic, and that across various police and paramilitary forces. This is why India was placed 62nd. It held 62nd place finish out of 118. And that in itself, in my opinion, reflects some of those structural weaknesses in specialized tactical training. This is why you have India now in charge of training, uh, uh, uh, not Burma, not Burma, the, uh, yeah, it's, it's, it's India that is training, uh, those units there. So makes you just wonder. And here is where the broader tension context regarding this comes in, in my opinion. You all remember what happened in 2020. With Galwan Valley clashes between India and China. And that standoff in itself has been some sort of a genuine flashpoint. That is why right after that, China has been rapidly building infrastructure. You're talking about roads, villages, airstrips, and so forth. Right up to the line of the actual control. And that in itself, from the perspective of the Chinese, is demonstrating the logistical and operational capacity that India struggled to match at the same pace. They can't. I am aware of certain activities India is conducting right now in some locations in the Himalayas, especially with the military locations. They're trying to some sort of put some infrastructure of sort. And this is why I keep saying, if India has true intentions of really forging a good relationship with China, the first issue would have been addressed is the issue of the border. But China will not do it. Mike, my word on it, they won't. And this is where I bring this SWAT challenge that took place because the SWAT female, the Chinese female SWAT team, the results, in my opinion, sort of rhymes with the broader pattern. China investing heavily in capability projections while India is playing catch-up. I mean, you also— what we talked yesterday, uh, with the, uh, Jayant Bhandari about the fiasco of the RoboDog that belongs to China, and, and, and India is claiming it was its. So that just shows you right there. Now there is one thing I need to bring to your attention. We can't ignore it because I've been following the structure. When I was in Washington, we used to deal with the, the whole structure of the Indian government, dealing with them. Sometimes you kind of exchange ideas for training, whatever, but they're just not up to standard. But here is the difference: the SWAT challenge was not conducted in a high-altitude Himalayan military setting, which India has been training for that because that is a very different setting from the regular standard, the one that took place in Dubai. So when you look at what India has, certain parts of its units, particularly its mountain warfare units, like the Indo— I'm aware of the Indo-Tibet Border Police, and Ladakh Scouts— those two, I'm very familiar with them— are specifically trained for this terrain and conditions right on China's border. Of course, something like this is not going to show up as an obstacle course in Dubai. I just— we need to keep that in mind as we analyze this particular setting, you know. So in this case, Some will argue that India might have some sort of an advantage in certain domains like this, but the one I push back against, especially coming from some analysts in Southeast Asia, mainly coming from India, arguing that India has a far stronger and powerful naval capabilities than the Chinese. Now that I have to push back against. And their argument was because India is battle-hardened counterinsurgency experience, it has that. Not necessarily. But whatever you see, the way you look at this and assess it, so What this competition with the, the Chinese squad team, a female squad team, sort of humiliating the Indian, uh, uh, SWAT team, male Indian SWAT team, that is. So what's important is that the competition tested also some slice of policing skills: speed, accuracy, coordination in controlled scenarios. So those of course are different from a setting in a warfare. The bottom line is this, and I'm going to move on to the much, much, much crucial aspects of this conversation or this analysis here. The bottom line is that the result is genuine data in my opinion, that fits a real pattern. China is outinvesting India in the kind of visible measurable capabilities that showcases that shape international perception. India stands no chance in that. And this is what I wanted to highlight to you. So where things are now, if I am to move to the hardcore military battle, I'm gonna ask the logical question: Does India stand the chance in winning against China?

Militarily?

What do you guys think? Let me ask the question again. In your opinion, and please, just if you— I want you to be part of the conversation. Please just answer yes or no in the chat box. Does India, in your opinion, stand a chance in winning against China militarily? So let me just see quickly here. Uh, so Lock 1970, you say no. Uh, yes, a chance to pray for Krishna. That's interesting. Farhad Razavi, you say no. Uh, Hanging G, you say India versus China, no. Uh, Singh Broey, you say no. And the reason I'm asking, the reason I'm asking, because remember one thing, a war between India and China ain't gonna happen. We're talking about a mutual destruction here. Nonetheless, I wanted to provide you the perspective in understanding because this is a really genuinely a complex strategic question that is still debating in many military think tank and among other military analysts till today. So when we think about, some will argue, well, why India will hold an advantage in this? So because they are arguing that the Indian military has been through war that China didn't. For example, they gave the example, which is true, that the PLA, the People's Liberation Army, hasn't fought a major war since 1979. And this happened, of course, against Vietnam. So where it performed at that time there. So some said didn't perform well, some said they performed poorly. It depends. India Army has a decade of live counterinsurgency, especially in Kashmir, which is make sense. But at the same time, we saw what happened against Pakistan, and that makes you take step back and say to yourself, really? Where is this hardened experience? Because it didn't materialize against the Pakistanis. And this argument is logical. India has another advantage, and this one is geographical one, because the advantages in a broader conflict— specifically, we're talking about the Himalayan borders here, the Himalayan terrain Who is gonna favor? It's gonna favor the defenders. And this, in this case, this is why India is pushing towards infrastructure in Himalaya, certain locations in the Himalayan, because their soldiers been training there, been stationed there for a while. I've been aware of it from way back in my days in Washington. So the high altitude, it's very different. I'll tell you just from experience, if you are to go to certain mountains in Afghanistan, you're going out about sort of certain high altitude, your performance is gonna— if you are not trained for that, you're gonna feel the difference. So this is where India has some sort of an advantage, if I may. But I push back against those who are saying that Indian Navy is considerably stronger than the Chinese in the Indian Ocean. Now that I don't, I don't support that argument because it's not true. It's not true. Why they are saying this? Because to them it matters strategically, you know. And why is this important if you think about it strategically? Because to China, this is almost like an economic lifeline. You're talking about oil from West Asia or Middle East. You're talking about trade routes, you're talking about all this, and all this are run through waters India could some sort of influence or in indirect, directly or indirectly. But I don't think so because India also understand the naval capabilities China has developed recently. India with that stands no chance. The US will stand no chance. Against the, let's say, the DF-21, for example, which I kept a picture of it here, I believe. Yes, right there. You know, no matter what India presents, it will stand no chance. The DF-26, the YJ-15, all those types of, uh, Chinese, uh, hardware weapons, that is. And this is why I wanted to go with that argument. We go with the counterargument to that is that where China holds serious advantages. Well, first you start with the Chinese defense budget, which is roughly 3 to 4 times in real terms than that of India. China also has modernized at a pace modernize its weaponry at a pace that India cannot and will not be able to match. You look at, for example, China's infrastructure along the LAC, Ladakh, that is the road, the roads, the rail and forward bases and so forth. And that in itself gives the Chinese a massive logistical edge and stage. Why? Because the Chinese will be able to move troops and supplies to the border faster, faster than India can. And if this is not enough, we think about Chinese Air Force, which is far advanced by any measures or standards vis-à-vis India. So add to this Chinese missile inventory is larger and more sophisticated. And it has, because China has been investing heavily in electronic warfare also, cyber capabilities, surveillance systems that India is still just trying to figure out where to start. So in modern conflict, you know, those asymmetries are decisive. In favor of whom? In favor of China. And that is why personally I would say this, we're not talking nukes here. And even with the nukes, China has the upper hand. But just with what I stated, India stands no chance. And if we are to move to the nukes or nuclear superiority, China has the upper hand in delivery systems and is believed to have, meaning China, the larger tactical nuclear arsenal positioned towards India than vice versa. So by any measure, when you look at it, India stands no chance. So in a full-scale conventional war between the two nuclear states, which is, in my opinion, will not happen, because as again, we're talking about a mutual assured destruction. It will be irrational for both to get involved in that. But what you're going to be seeing maybe from time to time, and it is realistic probability, is the border scrimmages that's going to be happening, the gray zone competition per se, which China— which China stands no chance.. But the main one is the border issue, which once again, China— India does not want to resolve. And in this case, India will stand no chance against China militarily. So when you look at in a prolonged conventional war on a multiple domain and platforms, we're talking air, we're talking cyber, we're talking naval, we're talking economics. China's advantages compound over time and India will struggle seriously. This is how I see it. Of course, geography cuts both sides, but again, you're going to have to think in terms how this is going to shape the direction of the conflict, if that ever happens. Liking this video so far? Don't just be a watcher. Go ahead and hit the like, share, and subscribe button, and don't forget to tap the bell so you will not miss any of my videos or livestreams. This way, you will be supporting a channel that stands for the truth and objective reporting. The choice is yours. Thanks for your support. Now consider geography, and geography cuts both ways. Because to China, China will be facing two-front problems if it ever seriously escalates with India. So given its, you know, the other issues that China has territorially, territorial disputes that still exist. India, which is counting on this in addition to the backing, the implicit backing of the United States, which, by the way, that's just for show. We have no intentions of backing India. We will let India just whatever. So because we don't care, we've just been using India and we will continue to use India to meet our sort of objectives. And this is why you see India jumping from one to the next, from one organization to the next, from one bloc to the next. And in the military setting, I'm talking about the Quad, the framework, US, India, Japan, and Australia. So do you think that the Japanese, the US, and the Australians will fight China? No, no, they're just going to be using India in this setting. And even for those who say, well, India is accelerating its defense modernization, that's nonsense. Because its defense industry is very, very, very slow. Remember where India is getting its fighter jets from? The Russians, the French, especially with what happened with the Rafale being shot down by Pakistani missiles. And I'm going to talk about this in a second here. So the one thing that I want to talk about briefly here is this, this assertion that India has the implicit backing of the United States. It's not necessarily true. It is not true, and especially when you consider under the, the Trump administration, this implicit backing has become much less reliable as a concept across the board. So to those who are saying otherwise, because what the US done, it stepped back. US is stepping back for security commitments, from other security commitments globally. And that in itself makes you just question this so-called an alliance between the US and India. And there is no such an alliance. There is no treaty. There is no military treaty between the two. So basically India will end up fighting on its own should there be a war with China, which I don't foresee at this moment. And this is why India is pursuing this sort of transactional, also foreign policy, jumping from one end to the next, because Indians and the Modi government understand that they can count on American support. It will be a strategic mistake to do so. That is why India is lost standing by itself, strategically speaking. It is not a former US ally, has no mutual defense treaty, and has historically resisted being pulled into the American-led security architecture. Yet they decide to go with Quad. That just makes you see, in, uh, like Jayant Pandhari said, India will go with whatever the wind is blowing. That is, that is where the issue, the big problem for India. So the big problem for India is that India's real strategic position that it stands alone in a direct confrontation with China. I mean, you hear about the partners, US, France, Japan. Yeah, they might provide some types of weapons, they might share intelligence, diplomatic support, but talking about boots on the ground or a direct military intervention, on Indians' behalf, forget about it, let alone it's against China. And that will be a much harder sell than it would have been, uh, even 5 years ago. And this is where I go back to the event that took place with Pakistan. And my thinking is that if Pakistan was able to defeat India using Chinese missiles then China will certainly win against India. No-brainer. I know there are some analysts are saying, well, wait a minute, wait a minute, Pakistan didn't defeat India. Well, what would you call that? What would you call the Operation Sindoor on May 25th? Because So some Indians still interpret it very differently, very differently. And of course, depending on the source you ask, what it appears is that Pakistan has responded with drones and missile strikes on Indian military installations and downed 6 fighter jets. Some of them even said about 8. Except that India didn't want to come forward. This is why India rushed into requesting ceasefire, even though Donald Trump wants to take credit for the ceasefire. Donald Trump didn't get involved in the ceasefire. That's a lie. And you know how Donald Trump is. No, no, no, no. It's India that wanted the ceasefire quickly. And when you consider the Pakistani use of the Chinese-supplied J-10, Let me share pictures. I got the pictures with— for, for you here. Uh, oh, I thought I uploaded, but let me do it. Let me do it quickly. Bear with me here. Uh, just matter of— I, I had it on the— it is J-10 and the other one is J-10C and the PLA. Okay. All right, let me get this one here. Chinese PLA. Okay, right there. Let me share it. There we go. When you consider— and both— that is the missile and there's the fighter jets. This is a Chinese one. The Pakistanis have been the, uh, another version of this one. So, so when you consider the Pakistanis' use of the Chinese-supplied J-10 and the PLM missiles, because it appears that they have performed very well, and there are credible reports of the Indian aircraft being downed. So, so this was some sort of a shock to many analysts who've been arguing, oh, The Indian Air Force is, is up to standard. No, it's not. It is not. And this is why the idea of why India had to rush into ceasefire. So the Chinese weapons performance, some sort of, was very significant. If they were able, because they are the, they operated against Indian air defenses against the Russian supply aircraft, against the French aircraft. And that in itself showed you the capability gap that exists. And now in today, as I'm speaking to you, consider what China has now fielded, far more advanced version of those same systems that were used. We're talking about new fighters. We're talking about hypersonic missiles. We're talking about more sophisticated electronic warfare than what Pakistan was using. So the gap between what Pakistan had and what China has in itself is enormous. And this is why, uh, to those who argue otherwise, no, no, no, no, no. What Pakistan did, it demonstrates the, the, the lack of the key— the capability, the lack of capabilities that India will have in case of a conflict with China, military one, that is. Because the other thing you need to consider is that Pakistan and China together will present India with fundamentally different military problems that India won't be able to manage. You talk about Pakistan's engagement was essentially an air and missile exchange along relatively sort of defined border. A China conflict with India will be primarily a high-altitude war in the Himalayas supplemented by air power. These are completely different aspects of it. And this is why When you consider about Indian military, because it is also oriented towards Western, uh, uh, uh, weapons, historically speaking, it's considered that it's been equipped with the most experienced forces. No, no, when they faced Pakistan, we saw what the outcome was. India also will be faced with, uh two fronts, pressures from both China and Pakistan, and it won't be able to manage that. So if Chinese supplies some sort of weapons in Pakistan's hand caused India serious problems, consider what China will do with the same systems. It's just a higher, higher caliber, if I may use, with far greater numbers. More advanced variants of those missiles, better logistics, cyber and space, cyber and space support. And this will present India with a qualitative harder problem that they can face. Because if there is anything I've learned from the conflict between India and Pakistan those days in May. Is that the Pakistani conflict, in my opinion, has revealed the vulnerabilities in the Indian air defense and equipment. So which, by the way, China has already war-gamed carefully. So, and that is why I looked at it as a defeat, what Pakistan was able to do. And what the records show, actually Pakistan did down 6 Indian fighter jets. And of course, India didn't want to admit to that first, then later on India realized that it's back then, at that time, they realized that it's no good if we escalate. Escalating was not a good idea. For India. That is the reason why it backed down. So now, to my knowledge and verified sources that I talked to regarding this, the independent assessment— we're not talking media here, we're talking independent ones— some of them have said 4 fighter jets I say 6 based on my sources. We're talking about 3 Rafales, 2 MiG-29, and 1 Su-30. The MiG— the Su— I'm sorry, the MKI, those are the Russians' Su-30, then the MiG-29, then the Rafales. And that is why India eventually acknowledged losses but never confirmed the exact number publicly. So, and that is why India agreed to a ceasefire. So India, even Indian Chief of Defense Staff, he noted that the Operation Sindhur created significant space for conventional operations. So that is why they, they, they, they suffered what they suffered. So here is what happened, and I'm going to share some clips here with you. During a recent visit of Macron to France to attend this, uh, AI fiasco, one of the conversations between Macron and Modi You know what Macron said to Modi? He said, I will be happy to train your fighters on Rafale. We will be happy to even sort of have a joint venture to build the Rafale in India. Why is Macron doing this? Because the Rafale performance has been exposed as weak. It stood no chance against the Chinese missiles. So, and of course, with what Donald Trump ate down— Donald Trump said there were 8 fighter jets down— mantra has badly affected, uh, Rafale market. So, so let me share this with you here, and I'm going to share it in form of the screen, uh, so you'll see, because there were some other, uh, clips into that I wanted to, uh, show you. All right, let's make this bigger here. And this is why, uh, Macron reportedly offered pilot training courses to enhance pilot performance and accuracy. So, and of course, Macron is saying, oh, for the— for your security, for Indian security. So I just want to share this with you while I have the screen on. And you know why now they're trying to— what I shared with you yesterday regarding, regarding the, that Hindu fanatics who was saying what he was saying in Canada. I don't know why the Canadian government tolerating that or allowing that, but again, that's their problem, not mine. So now let me play a clip, and I want you to hear what, uh, Macron really said about this one here. Let's take a listen here. I think I can play it, this one, because it doesn't have a sound on it. All right, let's take a listen. About the criticism about Rafale aircrafts many people were criticizing, but do you think that there will be 50% indigenous component in the Rafale aircraft?

We are always increasing indigenous components. It's part of this dialogue between the company and your government. And I mean, I don't, I don't see how people can criticize because it makes your country stronger, it increases strategic relations between us, and it creates more jobs here. And so very clearly, we are extremely uh, I would say committed to, uh, having a maximum number of Indian components and manufacturing maximum number of, of critical device in India. This is exactly, uh, the, the rationale and there's the Tata Airbus deal. So we will do the same for, uh, for the Rafale. You can count on this.

Okay, uh, I want to stop that one. I just want to share this, uh, with you so for you to to hear it yourself. So, so now it makes you just question about the quality of the production of those fighter jets is going to be in India. I mean, no offense to— but it's the truth. I mean, are you going to sort of produce, uh, fighter jets that the pilot's life depend on its performance in India? I'll let you decide. Let you decide for that. And this comes— I'm getting closer to closing here. This comes on the heels of India recently lost another one of its homemade Teja fighter, which they kept very quiet. You all remember what happened in Dubai last time, so I'm going to share a clip with you. This is an old one from, uh, 20— that was in December, if I'm not mistaken. You, you will recognize it as soon as you see it. So let me share screen and, and we will play it here for you. I don't know if it has a sound or not. If it does have sound, I'm going to mute it. So no, it doesn't. Yeah, I want silence. I know, I don't know why I didn't mute it, but And, and you all know the, uh, I mean, you know, the pilot died in that, in that incident. So that's just, uh, and this is why after the incident that just happened, another Tejas fighter went down recently. And right after that, the Indian Air Force went ahead and grounded the, the 30 strong— they call them strong single-seat Tejas Mk1 fleet following the crash. That's just— I'm gonna send you the link if I could get the link here for you. Okay, I'm gonna put it for you and you can, you can look it up yourselves. It's, it's a long one here, but I don't know if it will show up there. But anyway, that's, that's what happened, which happened on February 7th or 8th, if I recall. And what they're saying, it was due to suspected brake failure during landing. So the pilot ejected safely, but the aircraft suffered severe damage. And this is, by the way, the third incident involving this kind of aircraft. And that highlights to you the idea of where this is all about, what this is all about. And that is why I wanted to do this live stream for you. We started talking at the beginning about the Chinese female SWAT team, but I wanted to bring it to the bigger picture of the geopolitical landscape so you— for you to have a better understanding as to where things stand regarding India's— what it's doing right now. Oh, here's the picture. I forgot to show you this. This is what the French president was trying to sell the Rafale to India, of course, but they stand no chance. This is the plane that went down. The Indian one. So, all right, that's all I have to share with you for today. By the way, I am working on a very interesting story for you. This one has to do with this specific missile. This one is an Iranian-specific missile. It's called, uh, Sayyad-3G. I'm gonna be doing a live stream for you very soon. And I hope you can join me into that because there are some major developments going on with the ongoing negotiations in Geneva, the indirect one, and of course the military buildup of the US and so forth. So I'll be happy to do this for you in the next time soon, whenever I get a chance to do it. So I want to take the opportunity to say thank you to all the channel supporters and support. If you want to support the channel, here is the link. I will greatly appreciate your support. As always, uh, my, my Asia trip is still planned on. This with the assumption that we need the, the funding targets for it. So if you want to support that, uh, that, uh, campaign For this, I will be— there is the link where you can buy me tea for the Asia trip. And here is the link so far— not the link, but rather the picture of where we are so far. We are about— I think we are about 18%. I didn't update this yet because I received 2 donations in support of that trip. So I will greatly appreciate if you could support my upcoming Asia trip. As always, remember, geopolitics impacts your daily life in more ways than one. Till next time, bye-bye.