
David Oualaalou examines the missile strike in Przewodów, Poland, arguing that Ukraine and President Zelensky misrepresented what happened. He cites the Financial Times, US intelligence leaks, and Polish President Andrzej Duda's statements, pointing to wreckage identified as an S-300 air-defense missile as evidence Ukrainian forces were involved.
Chapters
Hello everyone and welcome to Geopolitical Trends. My name is David Oualaalou. So good to be with you as always. Ukraine is lying to NATO over the missile strike that landed in Poland. So in this video, I am gonna be providing you some insights and to the reason what, what happened exactly and why we are hearing a different story emanating from the West. But before I'll dive deeper, make sure to subscribe if you have not done so, and don't forget to smash that notification button so you will be notified every time I upload a new video. And I thank you, and I thank you for your support. It means a lot. So, so let's dive in into this. President Zelensky, or, or some call him comedian Zelensky, So now he's backtracking after using NATO, or urging rather, urging NATO's action for Polish border blast about the missile. So the situation is very ridiculous because now the truth is coming out to the surface. So basically what Kiev now is doing, or the leadership that is, not the city but the leadership in Kiev, is destroying its own credibility and the confidence of the entire Western world who's behind it. So, and all this stems from the missile that hit the southern, the southeastern part of a Polish village. It's called Przewodów, which is about 6 kilometers or about 4 miles from the borders between Ukraine and Poland. They're so close anyway. So, and so it's been reported now, according to an unnamed source, and the source is a diplomat from a NATO country. That's how high it goes. So it's been reported that Kiev has been accused of openly lying. This is exactly what this diplomat has said. And this is, by the way, according to the Financial Times. So the source, I have checked on it, it's accurate so far. But of course they won't disclose the name of the diplomat because that's the protocol, how it works. So basically openly lying— this is Ukraine— about the missile that hit Poland village, killing about 2 civilians, which just happened about a few days ago. So it is what's going on right now. What's going on right now is that Ukraine is rushing to pin the blame on Moscow, 'cause that's what they're trying to do. While the Russian Ministry of Defense stated that the footage, because they had images from the site or the pictures, or they took pictures from the sites basically. Well, what it shows, which is very, very astonishing, if you happen to be military, you will know, in a certain, every missile part will have to have, of course, the type, the identification number, and where it was produced. Well, what happened in, in the crash site of the missile is that the remnants of the missile were an S-300 missile system. Okay, the S-300 usually are Russians, right? But Russia is not using S-300 at this time, and only the Ukrainian Air Force that is a lot— that is using the S-300 missile. So that tells you right there where the story is, because NATO is able to track when missiles are launched and so forth. So this is basically getting very ridiculous, as the official from NATO stated, because like I said earlier, Ukraine is destroying its— the confidence of NATO in it, because basically with this lie, they bring in NATO and Russia into a confrontation, an open war. And we all know what that kind of war we are talking about here. So because they are— for the Ukrainians, they are openly lying, and the West is refraining from saying this. Now the, the truth is coming out. You are seeing a change of the language in both Brussels and Washington regarding, uh, how this lie could be, be very, very destructive. As the official said basically blaming, uh, Russia. It— this could be more destructive than the missile itself, because what do you think is going to happen if NATO deploy these troops or its missiles, whatever, to the border in, in Poland? What do you think Russia is going to do? We all know, because Russia is not going to be bluffing. So there will be confrontation. Which we don't know where it will escalate to. So, and of course, as I said, these comments from this diplomat in NATO, it came in response to President Zelensky, or comedian Zelensky, claiming, claiming rather, that Ukraine had nothing to do with the missile that struck Przewodów in Poland, which is a lie. So, but here is where you need to put this within the context. And the context I'm gonna be telling you, which has not been reported, by the way, is that few days ago, few days ago, a US intelligence official leaked information to CBS, to AP, the Associated Press, okay, saying that a Russian missile landed in Poland. So basically CBS News, Associated Press took the story, and New York Times, by the way, took the story and ran with it. Didn't even verify the accuracy of it. Plus, the intelligence officer who leaked the information, would you trust that? So because the officer from the intelligence community in the US saying that the Russian missile crossed. Here's what I said. Let me get the exact quote. What the US intelligence official said, and I quote this: a Russian missile crossed into NATO member Poland, killing 2 people. End of quote. Once again, as I always say, when it comes down to diplomacy, international relations, global affairs, and so forth, you have to pay close attention to the language. What this officer said was very calculated, measured, and intended for one specific outcome. And I will repeat the quote: Russian missiles crossed into NATO member Poland, killing two people. So you can just read between the lines here. So, so what you have basically is that you have NATO, the US, and Poland now have stated because they just stated this about a day ago, yesterday actually. They stated that there is no evidence to suggest Russia's direct involvement in the incident. Basically, they come in to realize that what President comedian Zelensky was saying is basically a lie. So even President of Poland, Andrzej Duda himself, has indicated that the projectile was likely a Ukrainian air defense missile. And this is where that S-300 missile system comes in, you know. And interesting enough is that Duda's, uh, statement was seconded— it was seconded by NATO Secretary General, uh, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, because NATO just met yesterday in Brussels, which, by the way, the meeting had nothing to do with this. It was a pre-scheduled meeting. It's just because NATO now wants to show unity when we all know there is no unity. NATO is cracking also, like the AU. So, and also, why, why they are saying this is because they've been caught in a lie. That's what they're saying, what they're saying. So even now you have a Polish president, Duda, that is saying there is no evidence, there is no evidence that the, uh, the missile that hits Poland was Russian. It was an intentional attack, a mistake of sorts, but the Russians have nothing to do with it. So, so, because he said, and I quote, let me get the quote here, Duda said, the president of Poland said, and I quote, we have no proof at this point to suggest the missile was fired by the Russian side, end of quote. Because he's realizing he was also lying, pushing the narrative, because Lula, I mean, Lula, Duda rather, you know, he has no grounding on which to stand by saying or pushing back against NATO because he can't. He's another figurehead that's been pressured to do whatever the West says he needs to do. That's the bottom line to it. So, and let's not pretend otherwise. So, and he added, and I quote, there is a high probability that it was a missile used for anti-missile defense, meaning it was used by Ukraine Defense Forces, end of quote. So of course, when this happens, you're gonna have to have Moscow now responding to all this. Well, they didn't waste time either, because Moscow has condemned the effort to paint it as the perpetrator. They argued that— the foreign ministry, that is— they argued that such statements could only be seen as an attempt to trigger a direct clash between Russia and NATO, and it will not be pretty. I tell you this from experience as a former military. It's not going to be pretty because the moment Russia sees the deployments of some offensive missiles on the border with Russia— with Poland— they're going to react to that. So after several media outlets as well as Ukrainian and Polish officials initially blamed Russia for the attack, Moscow's permanent representative to the United Nations, and his name is Vasily Neburnaev, he stated that it had not been— if it had not been for the evidence in the form of photos, because as I told you earlier, guys, the photos shows that it was an S-300 missile system which is only used by the Ukrainian Air Force. As of now. So basically he said that if it weren't for the evidence, all the facts will have been concealed from the public and Russia will have been proclaimed the guilty side, end of quote. So now you need to understand, you need to put this within the context of this kind of tactics and maneuvers by Ukraine to trigger a conflict between NATO and Russia, because we all know it will be destruction, basically. And what comedian Zelensky doesn't realize is that his country will be wiped out. So is Poland. So is all other Baltic or Eastern states, except for probably Hungary, Bulgaria, Czech Republics. Don't— won't be touched because they do have a good relationship with Russia, despite what you hear. So, so my conclusion to you is this, that you have to put this, these events of the landing of the missile on the village in Poland within the context of US-Russia relations. Why? Because it should be placed within also the context of global geopolitical balance of power, because that's what it is. And doing so, will also give us a clear understanding of sort of why US-Russia relations have impacted both countries politically, ideologically, and economic trajectories. So, and in both domestically, regionally, and globally. And this is why you are having now the head of the CIA William Burns meeting with his counterpart, the Russian counterpart, and I will do a video about it next time so you'll have an idea. Usually when the head of the intelligence services meet, there is something behind the scenes that needs to be worked out. So as one who worked in Washington and very familiar with this kind of tactics and approaches, this is usually what it is. But I will do a video for you guys about this particular topic of the meeting between the head of the CIA and his counterpart in Russia. So, well, as I always say, remember, geopolitics impacts your daily life in more ways than one. Till next time, guys, bye-bye.
More from David

Beyond the Single Actor: Why the Gulf Isn't Choosing Between the US and China

Iran, Iraq's Militias, and the Houthis Are Coordinating! This Changes Everything

Who Controls the Next Decade's Resources? Latin America and Africa's Geopolitical Crossroads

The Chokepoint Trap: How Washington's Stupidity Triggered a Cascade That Now Controls the World

Trump Spooked as IRGC Unveiled dual-use SLV, Deployed Ghadir Mini-Subs & Hinted at Tactical Nukes!





