Mysterious Explosions Rock Iran's Coasts! Who’s Behind it?

Hello everybody and welcome to Geopolitical Trends, where truth matters. Iran says they never attacked United Arab Emirates. Makes you wonder why this specific country. The United Arab Emirates says they shut down 15 missiles and 4 drones coming from Iran. The US is saying, oh, we sank 6 Iranian boats. Eran says none of these boats were touched. So someone is lying here, and figuring out who changes everything about how this war ends, it will be a daunting task to say the least. So what I'm going to try to do in this live stream for you, provide you my own brief analysis about it. I'm going to share a clip with you and do the translation for you. It's about, uh, 3 minutes or so. It's because I had to do the translation myself. I don't trust the machine sometimes. And they figure out, okay, is who's, who's behind the explosions in the, uh, on the Iranian coast? Because this is not, this is not a coincidence. Someone is bombing something around Bandar Abbas, around the areas of, of, uh, Iran scopes. So as of today, May 6th, 2026, the situation remains extremely tense. So you have now President Trump who is basically declining to confirm whether the ceasefire is still in place like, like the, uh, the head of the Central Command, uh, after both sides now exchange— both sides, Iran and the US, exchange fire in the Strait of Hormuz. And of course, he is warning the Iranian forces that they will be blown up of the face of the Earth— this is Donald Trump's word— if they ever attempt to target US ships. You have at the same time the incompetent Secretary of State saying that the US— and I quote here— US operations in Peshmerga has achieved its objective. What a bunch of baloney, Secretary of State. And now is demanding, meaning the US is demanding or asking Iran to pay a price for closing the Strait of Hormuz. How, how idiotic the approach coming out of the White House. Anyway, I'm going to be providing you first of all, uh, the clips, and I'm going to share my own analysis because we need to get into the bottom as who is really conducted those bombings in those areas. And I'm going to provide you, uh, uh, uh, pictures of the location of these sites. So the question is, we're not going to go— and I'm not going to go over again why the narrative of this war is so significant. I, I know I talked about this yesterday. For those who might have missed the video from yesterday, I'm going to put the link in the chat box for you. You can watch it later on if you decide to do so. Suffice it to say, in, in, in a brief, brief summary, is that the narrative, the significance of it because the Strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical energy choke point. Two, both sides are making— Iran and US are making flatly contradictory claims as of today. That depends again. And the third is that Project Freedom versus a legal passage. And this is again one of the core narrative clash. So, so to those who have missed, as I said, the video I did yesterday, I, I put the, the, the link in the chat box. You can go and check it out. So let me start the first clip in which I'm gonna translate everything for you. I'm not doing the entire clip because it's— the whole video is about an hour, but there is one part of it, and I verified it and confirmed certain aspects. Because when you consider why this particular country will be the one to conduct the, uh, attacks or the explosions near Iran's borders, especially in, uh, near Bandar Abbas and so forth. It will make more sense. So let's take a listen, or you guys just watch the, the, the images, and I'm gonna do the translation for you. All right, let me bring it up here on the screen, and we're gonna start this one here. All right, here is what it says. Mysterious explosions rocked the Iranian coastline and islands in the early hours of this morning, meaning of yesterday morning at 4 o'clock in the morning. Uh, this information emerged through local Iranian reports, specifically those that first spoke of these blasts, as well as through Iran International and several other agencies. These sources confirmed that at approximately 04:15 Tehran time this morning, meaning yesterday, two initial explosions occurred on Kashm Island. Subsequently, two more explosions struck Bandar Abbas, followed by yet another series of blasts in Bandar Abbas. Typically, explosions of this nature occurring in such a specific pattern are indicative of combat aircraft operating in a coordinated manner, that is, flying in a single wave to strike Keshem and then proceeding directly to strike Bandar Abbas. What makes this situation particularly intriguing is that neither the United States nor Israel has actually initiated any operations nor have they claimed to be conducting, for instance, preemptive strikes against potential Iranian attacks targeting the Strait of Hormuz. In short, there is no evidence of any direct military action by either the United States or Israel. Furthermore, even the Iranian side has refrained from accusing either the United States or Israel. This lack of attribution is precisely what has kept the nature of these explosions shrouded in mystery. Indeed, the finger of suspicion has instead been pointed towards the United Arab Emirates. Specialized sources, specifically those linked to Israeli intelligence such as Babak have asserted that the United Arab Emirates was behind these attacks, utilizing Mirage 2000 aircraft to carry out these targeted strikes. Such incidents have in fact occurred before. We witnessed a similar scenario just 3 weeks ago, specifically on April 8th, at the very outset of the truce between the United States and Iran. Suddenly, on the first day of that truce, explosions erupted on both Laman Island and Seri Island, which we, we see depicted here. These explosions appear to be directed at warehouses and oil facilities. At the time, reports from Axios indicated that neither the United States nor Israel was responsible for that operation. Subsequently, Iran also reported the same. It was the United Arab Emirates that carried out this response, a retaliatory measure against Iran, because the United Arab Emirates was the country most heavily targeted by Iran's attack. Compared to other Gulf states, the United Arab Emirates has been subjected to the highest volume of drone attacks launched by Iran. A figure that surpasses even the number of drones launched towards Israel. Regarding these attacks, which coincide with the commencement of the recent truce, official Iranian circles affiliated with the government circulated an image claiming it depicts a United Arab Emirates-owned Mirage, or Mirage, aircraft that has alleged targeted the islands of Lavan and Siri. Upon closer inspection of the aircraft in the image, one notes the absence of any national insignia clearly identifying it as belonging to the United Arab Emirates. However, the design bears a striking resemblance to the Mirage 2000 aircraft currently operated by the United Arab Emirates. Consequently, the explosions that occurred today in Bandar Abbas as well as Qeshm Island could be viewed as retaliatory measures, assuming that United Arab Emirates did indeed carry out the aforementioned attack, as suggested by various sources. This perspective gains further credence given that the United Arab Emirates has previously been subjected to unprovoked attacks by the Iranian side, specifically following the launch of Operation Freedom by the United States. This initiative is, is defense and humanitarian project designed to facilitate the safe passage of vessels primarily through the Strait of Hormuz and to protect them from potential Iranian aggression. Indeed, just yesterday, the Iranian side launched an attack on Fujairah, as clearly visible in the image, striking a specific target within the area. This recent incident may therefore serve as the justification for the direct retaliatory operations that subsequently unfolded. Even though the United Arab Emirates has not officially claimed the responsibility for any attacks against Iran, rather it is various informed sources that are reporting these details regarding actions taken against the Iranian side. Finally, regarding the Iranian side rationale for targeting Fujairah, a choice that may surprise some observers, the fundamental issue lies in the context of the US launch of Operation Freedom. As US destroyers arrive and successfully navigate the region, Fujairah serves as a critical hub for oil exports, effectively bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. With the region capable of exporting approximately 2 million barrels of oil a day, ultimately oil prices are bound to fall, and this is precisely what Iran seeks to avoid. This constitutes Iran's fundamental struggle. Consequently, Iran is not merely confronting a US Navy, a force fully capable of executing defense operations with exceptional effectiveness, but is also attempting to strike Fujairah. Its objective is to halt oil exports, thereby seeking to control the situation, keep oil prices elevated, and even drive them higher still, and ensure that the conflict remains at its absolute peak. And this is exactly— again, when you think about, uh, the reason I wanted to do this— I'm gonna stop right here— uh, the reason I wanted to do this is to show you and highlight to you exactly what has been going on, because there are mixed reports stating different, uh, ideas about this particular surprise. I'm gonna do another clip for you And the, uh, uh, let me, let me share the screen here, then we'll continue with our conversation. And then, and I'm gonna keep this short because it's, it's too long. Again, I'm not gonna do it in its entirety. Basically what it's stating, the escalating war of narrative between Washington and Tehran is fueled by two highly sensitive issues: the economic blockade and the Strait of Hormuz. Each side presents its own account of the same events, yet does so in a manner designed to serve its specific political and military objectives. In recent hours, coinciding with the launch of Operation Freedom Project, the contradictions between these narratives have become starkly apparent. Official, official Iranian media outlets announced that Iran missiles has struck US Navy units within the Strait of Hormuz. Furthermore, an Iranian military official claimed that his forces has compelled a US destroyer to retreat following the issuance of a stern warning. US Central Command, for its part, denied that any of its vessels had sustained hits. Admiral Brad Cooper confirmed that US forces had successfully intercepted and destroyed cruise missiles and drones launched by Iran in the direction of both warship and commercial vessels. This diversion in narrative was also evident in the details of recent direct confrontation, wherein the US president confirmed the destruction of 6 to 7 small boats belonging to the Iranian, uh, to the IRGC after they attempted to target US vessels or interfere with shipping lanes. The Iranian side in turn denied the account regarding the destruction of the IRGC boats. Tehran accused Washington of targeting civilian passenger vessels in the strait, asserting that 5 civilians had been killed in this attack, which is true, by the way, and I'm going to show you a picture. This lack of clarity in official statements also extends to the missile and drone attacks repelled by the United States— by the United Arab Emirates, regarding which Iranian state TV quoted a military official as stating that Iran had no— had no premeditated plan to attack oil facilities in Fujairah. It will appear then that average— everyone is engaging in deception. Indeed, navigational data has revealed that the Maritime Automatic Identification System was subjected to jamming, resulting in the appearance of ghost traffic, false vessel movements within the Strait of Hormuz. The war of narrative between Washington and Tehran shows no signs of abating. The situation hinges not merely on unfolding events but also on how the narrative is framed, with each party spinning the scene to serve its own interests. Iran asserts that it exercises total control over the strait dictates transit conditions and issues threat against any force entering without prior coordination. Washington meanwhile speaks of the launch of Operation Freedom and claims success in safety escorting merchant vessels through the waterways despite all threats. Amidst this interplay of denials and confirmations It is not just the truth that gets lost. Rather, a battle of a different kind is taking shape—a battle for control over the narrative itself. With every contradictory statement, the stakes rise, oil prices surge, and the markets fall into disarray. So I'm going to stop right here just to highlight to you one thing that really caught my attention during this interpretation, this translation, which I did it personally because I wanted to make sure, is the— when the Central Command, uh, like I said yesterday, denied any— anything happened. Uh, when I did this translation, the Central Command denied that any of its vessels had sustained hits, which means the attack occurred but it's not sustaining any direct hit from the missiles. And that's where the contradictory, uh, in itself. So let me show you the locations of where this, uh, explosions took place. First of all, uh, this, it says right there in Arabic, Madhia, okay? And I'm going to show you where Bandar Abbas— that's a part of the island that where these explosions occurred. That's Bandar Abbas right there. The other one is Qishm Island. And here is the location of Keshem Island, or the Île de Keshem. That's in France, written in French there. Uh, uh, that's where the island of Keshem. And the other location that was attacked is Lavan Island. It's right here. The way you look at it is right there at the top left corner, what I have my cursor pointing at. That's where the Lavan Island. And the next island is Sirri Island, and its location is right in— right here, way down. This is Bandar Langt. Bandar Abbas is right here, but Sirri is right here in the bottom near Abu Musa. Abu Musa Island is another island that the, uh, Iran and United Arab Emirates have issues over. So suffice it to say, as to who conducted the operation, it wasn't the United States and it wasn't Israel. And this is where the confirmation came over the Mirage 2000 that belongs to the United Arab Emirates. And as a matter of fact, in its fleet, United Arab Emirates does have a Mirage, exact resemblance, except that it was no insignia on it. So as to the claim that the US attacked a boat of a civilian, not a military, it is true because the 5 people that died— I found the picture, they were carried yesterday— the Iranian IRGC member killed in the explosion. This is part of the explosion, but there were also civilians who were killed in the attack by the US. You know, that's, that's very, very important. I just need you to see this for your own self so you understand. Uh, what we need to get out of this is that the narrative of war in the Strait of Hormuz is significantly— precisely, it's significant no matter how you look at it. And significant— why is this? Because it is because the Strait of Hormuz, that is functions as both a physical and a psychological choke point. Uh, I think I had a picture of the location of it. Uh, no, I don't. But anyway, you know where the Strait of Hormuz— yeah, right here. Sorry, it's right there. This is why this, this strait, uh, acts as a physical and psychological choke point. It's very, very crucial. To understand. And who controls the narrative will make more sense on it. So the side that convincingly controls the story of who's the aggressor, who's protecting civilians, and whether the ceasefire holds— that party that succeeds in doing all this determines whether global shipping resumes, whether Iran's nuclear negotiations succeed, and whether the fragile, uh, ceasefire sort of collapses back into a full-scale war. Because right now, what do we have? We have both sides that are sort of fighting for this narrative, and in my opinion, could be the most dangerous outcome of all. All it takes is miscalculation. That's all it's going to take. And that is again where the problem is. And all this comes during a, a crucial time that the, uh, uh, Iran foreign minister made the trip to China yesterday, last night. He's there today. He is in Beijing. And that in itself gives you an idea as to how China sees this. And China— as a matter of fact, Mr. Abbas, Dr. Abbas, issued the statement which was coordinated with the Chinese, is that China will fully support Iran for their right to defend against any foreign power statements, because China now is realizing it is now or never for it to move forward with its, uh, uh, approach to how it sees this one here. And this is again the important aspect that I need you to understand as to really what triggered all this, uh, sort of mysterious explosions. Suddenly nobody was planning on it, nobody thought about it, nobody saw it coming, and all of a sudden you have mysterious explosions. If the truth matters to you, hit like, subscribe, and tap that bell. No spin, no agenda, just the stories they don't want you to know. Don't watch from the sideline, be part of the movement. Your support keeps the truth alive. Thank you. And this is again what I, I find it very, very crucial to have some sort of an understanding of the developments that's taking place. Because if there are these mysterious explosions, you're gonna have to— you, in this case Iran, we have to dig it to the bottom of it. Why? Because they need to understand if there is any third party that is also participating with the United States and Israel in its war against Iran, or in their war against Iran. No, and that is the importance of understanding, because not knowing who conducted those airstrikes or, or targeting is going to leave the door wide open to— now any third party could just launch whatever and blame it on someone else. And like I said, the danger with this situation is the miscalculation. If there is any miscalculation, it's going to become a very very problematic. So, and I wanted to, uh, make sure that you guys understand this. So I'm going to be playing a clip for you. I'm keeping this, uh, live stream today very short here because that's— I, I just wanted to share those— that information with you and, uh, and, and provide very brief, uh, take on it based on how, uh, I, I, I see this particular aspects of it. So Now there is one aspect, is that, uh, where Iran is going with this moving forward. Where is it going with this one here? Why you think it's still moving forward with its, uh, approach to missile technology, the satellites, the communication, and so forth? Why? Because Iran, despite all this, now it's becoming the 9th country in the world to independently build and launch a satellite into orbit. I know, I was aware of the scenarios when they tried and they failed a couple times. Remember the missile, the rocket, the, uh, Qaim-100, which was— it failed the first time, but they tried it second time and succeeded. And because what you need to understand with that is that achieving this milestone requires a sort of mastery of rocketry. You have to have a better understanding about how rockets works. You have to have an understanding about propulsion. You have to understand about guidance, how it works. You have to understand about orbital mechanics of all this. And all this requires some really serious and hard engineering to succeed. No, no shortcuts whatsoever. And why it matters, some might ask, that it's Iran become, uh, uh, some sort of, uh, uh, able to launch a satellite. It's because satellites run communications, they also run navigation, weather surveillance. So independently launching a satellite means you control your own space. Backbone without relying on anyone else. That is the important aspect of this one here. So, so let me just provide you my, uh, brief conclusion here, because I, as I said, I wanted just to share the clips with you. I verified them, I did the translation myself to make sure, and I just want you to be aware of what is going on. So what started as a mysterious explosion in an Iranian Port City, which by the way was blamed on a gas leak in a building that had no gas in it whatsoever, has now unraveled into one of the most consequential conflicts of our time moving forward. Yeah, and yet when you think about that 21-mile narrow strait of the Strait of Hormuz, that narrow strait right there, 21 miles wide, now sits at the center of the global economic crisis. It sits also at the center of a fragile ceasefire, and it sits also in the center of a war where both sides can't even agree on what happened 5 minutes ago. That is where the danger is. So the missiles are real, by the way, and the oil prices that's going up are real. I just saw this morning driving, uh, back to the house, uh, gas crossed now $4.29 a gallon in the state of Texas. We are an oil state. You never— if you ask somebody 10 years ago, they'll tell you, you must be smoking weeds. We don't see those kind of prices here in Texas. And yet it is. So, so it is real. The oil prices are real. You also have the stranded ships are also a real reality. But what is important is that in this conflict, the narrative may be the most powerful weapon of all as of now. And it seems to me— and I'm like, again, I'm being objective in my assessments here— both sides, the US or Iran, nobody right now, nobody is winning cleanly. It's still back and forth. So how long will this last? I do not know. All I know is that the tracking of the movement of the USS Gerald Ford aircraft carrier, which is heading out to— I think they might, they might have already arrived, uh, to that location, uh, crossing through, makes you just wonder, is really the aim of Donald Trump was always a second round of conflict. And that's why even when I asked the question for the community, which by the way, thank you for participating, uh, for that, the question that I asked was, uh, will Trump avoid military escalation in the Strait of Hormuz in favor of diplomacy? 20% of you said yes, 72% of you said no. And 8% say don't know. And that to me personally gives me an idea that you are thinking in the right direction as to I don't see that Donald Trump will favor diplomacy or is favoring diplomacy, because if he does, or if he had the intentions of doing so, he would have pushed harder during the first round of negotiations. And out of all of you that participated, which was over 1,000 participants on this, 72% who said no, that Donald Trump will— will, uh, uh, would Trump avoid military escalation in the Strait of Hormuz in favor of diplomacy? 72% of you said no. It's— and I concur with, with your assessment in this. Became clear to me where this is, is going to go. And on that note, uh, I want to share also another survey question that I asked you earlier, given that the Mr. Arakchi was in China, still in China, he didn't leave yet, which I found very interesting because the question was, given Trump's anticipated visit to China in mid-May while the burden of the current US war with Iran weighs on him, do you believe the shift in the balance of power is in Beijing's favor? 93% of you said yes, 4% of you said no, and 3% of you said don't know. And we have almost same number of participants, over 1,000. And rightly so. Once again, I, I find myself agreeing with those who voted yes because it is exactly the reason Why Erdoğan went to China? Because Erdoğan is also realizing that China will play much more, uh, sort of, uh, uh, uh, uh, influential role on the global stage than at any other time. But also China had to think about its own strategic interest, especially the access to oil. And as a matter of fact, there is now another events taking place in Malacca Strait. And I'm gonna do a video for you. I didn't forget, and I usually stuff like that, uh, and I'm gonna do a video for you about this particular what's going on, especially with Indonesia. And to put it in perspective, the Chinese are realizing we better just step forward, and it's time for China to do so. That is why I find it very interesting that the number we had, 93% of you said yes to that question, that the shift of the balance of power in Beijing's favor. So, and by the way, thank you very much for participating in that. So, so before I leave you, before I sign off here, I want just to leave you with one question. Once again, if you feel comfortable enough to leave a comment, and I read your comments and I thank you for, uh, really writing a comment there for to share your knowledge with the community. If both the United States and Iran are controlling what we see, what we hear, what gets reported, how do any of us actually know who started this? Who is lying? And most importantly, Who gets to write the history? So make sure you drop me your thoughts in the comment section. I would greatly, greatly appreciate it, appreciate you for that. Uh, it's because again, I find myself asking the, the questions that matter, that matter, because I, I keep asking myself whether this ceasefire is going to hold. I found an answer. It's unlikely, you know. And I ask myself, are we headed towards something far worse? And I find myself answering yes. It's because there is no, no, no will, you know, why the US is going this route and, and launching a war and all that, because we started it. Let's just be, be straightforward about it. So I don't hold back about this one. Anyway, make sure you drop me a comment in the comment section. I will greatly, greatly appreciate you for that. So, uh, I want to just take opportunity here to say thank you to Tim Steele. Thank you so much for buying me, uh, cups of teas in support of my upcoming Asia trip. I'm very grateful. You wrote, you are in my— and I quote here— you are in my top 5 sources of info now. And in record time. Thanks a mil, thanks a million, thank you very much, Tim. Truly appreciate your kind support. And for those who wanted to support, let me first of all share, uh, with you where we are, uh, as far as fundraising. And I have to, as I said, I'm sorry I didn't update it. We are about 3,047 to be exact. I, I keep track of the numbers. I didn't put it up yet, so— but that's where we are, uh, so far. And should you decide to, uh, support my upcoming trip to Asia, here is the link if, if you decide to do so. I will be very grateful. I do plan, should we reach that target number of $10,000, I do plan on heading out towards the end of August, uh, for the whole month of September because of the locations I plan on going. And if we don't reach that— sorry, let me, let me move this one out— and if we don't reach that target number, then I'll postpone the trip until the following year or some other time. For those who want to support the channel, here is the link for it. I would greatly appreciate your support. And thanks to those who already bought me coffees in support of this. And if you are interested in reading a little bit more about what I wrote about the region. Again, that's my academic background, focus on the Middle East or West Asia. I, I've been on the ground when I was still in, in, in Washington. I've dealt with some high-ranking individuals there, so I kind of understand that the depth of, of, of the political setting in the region. So So if you want to get a copy of, uh, my, my books, here's the link for it. This is— I wrote about the Saudis, I wrote about Iran, uh, American foreign policy in the region, and the last book was the Russia book. So, and I'm currently working on another book, uh, that I will be released at some point soon. So anyway, I hope you enjoy this, and I look forward to seeing you next time. As always, remember, geopolitics is impacts your daily life in more ways than one. Till next time, bye-bye.