Trump's Secret Deal with Iran?Israel Says Never.

Hello everybody and welcome to Geopolitical Trends, where truth matters. The United States and Iran, some say, are hours away from signing a deal that could maybe end the war. But at the same time, you have Israel dropping bombs to stop it. So what you are about to hear in this brief livestream, sort of the information and the content will change everything you thought you knew about who really controls American foreign policy in the region. So in the end of it, there is one page, one-page document that is sitting right now as we speak on Donald Trump's desk in the White House. And that document, that one-page document, could either prevent World War III, okay, or trigger it. It could really trigger it. And the man most determined to make sure Donald Trump never signs it isn't in Tehran, he's in Tel Aviv. This is the crazy thing. And that's why I'm gonna be sharing with you in this livestream my own analysis. I've been following on it. As I was flying from one region to the next. And I figured today I'm gonna just block time to do this livestream to keep the community updated regarding this. My apologies for earlier, it was messed up on the time zones. So in any way, it's fixed and we are now on the air. So that's what matters. So now the question that many are asking, are the US and Israel truly on the verge of the biggest diplomatic breakthrough? Since the conflict in West Asia exploded? And that's exactly the same question many other analysts are asking. So the short answer, we don't know. We don't know. Are we talking about significant progress? Maybe. In the assessments of people in the know, they're saying those are baby steps. No. One thing is sure, at least from me looking outside in, there is no deal. And that's exactly what even some media outlets reported. Yeah, there is a major diplomatic moment. Nobody's denying this, which is taking place, but there are still significant obstacles remain. And both sides, Israel and the United States, are still publicly disagreeing on key themes. This is why you can't trust Donald Trump for for what he's saying, that, oh, we got a deal, oh, Strait of Hormuz is open. That's a lie, Mr. President. Stop lying. Stop lying, because it's an embarrassment not only to yourself, but for us as Americans, let alone what it does to the US credibility, which has been shattered anyway, no matter what the US does now. I don't know if you are aware of it. I, I was informed yesterday that now the State Department and the Treasury Department in the US are threatening sanctions on Oman. Oman, out of all the places. And Oman's been friendly to the US, and now the US is threatening them. This is what I'm saying, there is no credibility left. So, so what I'm going to do in this, uh, livestream, I'm going to be providing you the detail of what was involved in this report. I'll provide you— I will provide you my own analysis and just conclude with this. I don't have a lot of images for you guys today, uh, uh, just didn't get a chance to really dig around to pull up some pictures like we always do here. Now, what has been actually agreed upon? So that's one thing you need to understand. The US and Iran negotiators have reached some sort of an agreement, and that agreement consists of 60 days, 2 months, memorandum of understanding, an MOU. Okay. And the purpose for it is to extend the ceasefire Okay, a lunch, lunch negotiations on Iran nuclear program. This is what's been reported in the US. And I'm not going to jump to conclusions yet. We'll continue in our conversation. But Trump has yet to give his formal approval, which means Trump didn't even agree yet. And there's a simple reason, because Trump has to wait the order from his patron. From whomever makes the decision. It's not Trump. And yet Trump will have to do it formally to accept this particular acceptance of this deal. So, so the deal drafted as involved, or the deal involved rather, that was drafted, this 6— 60 days extension, uh, sort of, uh, during which this time, the 60 days, if it is agreed upon, the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened. That's once again what the American side are saying. I'm going to tell you what the Iranian side are saying. Iran will be able to free— freely sell oil, and negotiations will be held on curbing Iran's nuclear program. Pay attention to these words because that's what is reported in Washington, which has nothing to do with the truth. The MOU, the Memorandum of Understanding, will also include in it, it will include some sort of Iran commitment not to pursue nuclear weapon and will address the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon. And this particular, the last one, an issue on which Trump and Netanyahu have had at least one tense negotiations. And it tells you right there who is in charge. If you as a president of the United States will have to have intense negotiations with the leader of a foreign country regarding an issue that you are involved, it tells you the story right there who is in charge. Because here is the major sticking point that as of now still remain the core disagreement. One, it has to do with the nuclear question, which is at the core of the dispute. What Mr. Trump is saying is that because Trump is describing Iran as in yielding on the nuclear issue. In other words, it doesn't want to waver on this. And because here is what Trump said, and I quote, most points were agreed to, which is a lie, by the way, but the only point that really matters, nuclear, was not. End of quote. Once again, I find myself repeating, can you trust what Trump is saying? The answer is as clear as it gets, and you all know the answer. Iran Foreign Minister said an agreement was just inches away, but criticized the maximalist demands from the US negotiators, which is a right assessment because basically we are putting the gun on the head of Iran and saying, you need to agree to what we are dictating to you. And here is what Iran is saying through its semi-official news agency, which is Fars. That's the one that is, uh, and I'm gonna use word for word as it was reported, as I read it, because I saved this one. So I read it as is. It stated flatly, flatly the following, and I quote: Iran has made no commitments in this agreement regarding handing over nuclear stockpiles, removing equipment, closing facilities, or even pledging not to build a nuclear bomb, end of quote. So compare this, that I just— what I just stated, shared with you right now to what I stated earlier from the American side. The difference can be as clear as day and light. There is another media outlet inside Iran. It's called ISNA. That one also has quoted a senior Iranian diplomat saying that Tehran has not made any commitments in negotiations on the nuclear issues, including the highly enriched uranium. And that tells you once again, yes, Iran is talking to the Americans, But those two issues are not addressed while the Americans are saying the reverse, the opposite, the lies, basically. Because here is the thing: Iran sees the question of its enriched uranium as a sovereign issue and has indicated on many occasions the opposition to shipping it out of the country, especially with what the Supreme Leader, Mujtaba Khamenei, just disclosed about a week and a half ago or two weeks. I did disclose this to you, that he said the uranium stays on the Iranian soil. And that tells you right there where the disparity is, the discrepancies are between what the US saying, because we don't, we never say the truth anyway. No. And here is the core of this whole saga that hardly any media wants to address openly. Because media is ordered not to disclose certain information, and that's usually been the norm. I mean, look at me just here, for all of us, our community. When I talked about an issue like India or whatever, they went ahead and took down the video. This will be no different. And that factor is Israel. Israel's main concern is that there will be a narrow interim agreement between the United States and Iran that extends the ceasefire. Of course, they, they will agree to that to a degree, and open the Strait of Hormuz. Of course, because they have to match the wording of the American side without addressing the most critical points for Israel. Notice it didn't say the most critical point for the United States, it says for Israel, and that is Tehran's nuclear program and enriched uranium. And once again, right there, it gives you a confirmation that the disagreements based on the objective of Israel, not the United States. And I remember I had a chance to— because you need to think about it, think about history. And I'm going to bring a history, just brief snapshot about it. I'm going to take you back to during Neville Chamberlain. You all know who is, right? The former foreign minister of England who returned at that time used to be the— was there back then the negotiations between, uh, with, uh, between the US— I'm sorry, between, uh, Germany and the UK, which, uh, Neville Chamberlain was the one involved in. And those— the negotiations between Neville Chamberlain and Hitler back then, which was in September 1938, the negotiations took place— I, if my memory serves me well, it was in Munich. Or München in Germany. And that is— why is this important? Once again, I want to draw a parallel. The deception, that is the key. The deception, the false aspirations, the mirage of hope, false hopes, that is, because Trump is doing the same. And I don't know if you had a chance to read what he stated in his social media. Not that I am subscribed to that account, I don't. It's just I read from different sources. And here is what he said: An agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization between the United States and Iran. Okay, and the various other countries as listed. Final aspects and the details of the deal are currently being discussed. Well, if you are to say a largely negotiated and agreed on, what do you still negotiate about? And it will be announced shortly. In addition to other elements of the agreement, the Strait of Hormuz will be opened. This is exactly what Donald Trump put into his platform or whatever. And I want you to draw the parallel between what took place in 1938 between Chamberlain, Neville Chamberlain and Hitler, and the same, the deception part of it. So far, here is what is happening. The framing, the framing of this agreement, as Donald Trump puts it, the signing of this MOU will be the most significant diplomatic breakthrough since the war started. Nobody is arguing that, but there is the other side of the argument. The other side is that the breakthrough or so-called resolution to all this are very different from what the reality is. And that's always been the case with Donald Trump. Let me see if I could, uh, yeah, between what he's saying and what the reality is. Because what's being negotiated right now is essentially a framework to negotiate. It's not an agreement, it's a framework, the 60-day window to tackle the truly hard issues, the nuclear issue, the nuclear file, the enriched uranium and so forth. The permanent end of the hostilities remain unresolved. And this is why You have Trump wishy-washy, backpedals on certain issues because he had to take— he has to take orders from his patron. Simple as that. And it's the truth. Trump doesn't make decisions. No, because as we speak, there are massive strikes in southern Lebanon. How would you explain that? So, and even if we are to go with the details, you have to understand about what's in that one-page document, those 14 key points that's being negotiated between Trump and Iran, with Trump's envoys and Iran for that matter. Because there are key provisions. And once again, you think about the Strait of Hormuz. As the first one that comes to mind, during this 60-day period, the Strait of Hormuz will be open with no tolls, no fees to transit, and Iran will agree to clear the mines it deployed in the strait so to let the ships pass freely. I will say good luck to that, Mr. Trump. You think you're gonna trick Iranians once again? And this is why what the US is saying to Iran is, said, where are we going to do this? We're going to do what we called relief for performance, which is pathetic. Anyway, the bottom line to this is that basically the faster the Iran government, the Iranian government rather, clear the mines and let the ships resume, the faster the blockade will be lifted. Once again, what makes us think that Iran is going to agree to something like this? And by the way, the US is putting a condition for the removal of mines within 30 days, not 60 days. And in exchange for this, the US will lift its blockade on the Iranian port and issue some sanction waivers to allow Iran to sell oil, refine oil freely on the market. Of course, the US will have to make it sound like, oh, this is going to be a big boom to the Iranian economy and will give significant relief to the global oil market. But this is not about the war. This is about Donald Trump himself, because he is stuck He got into a war that he has no strategy for, let alone now find an exit. And the US keeps saying, we will negotiate in good faith. We will commit to negotiations about the broader sanctions relief on Iran. Once again, as an American, I find myself have to ask the question that matters. Will I trust my own government? No, no. So if I am— if I cannot trust my own government, do you think a foreign country will? As they say, it's not a laughing matter. I'm just— sometimes that's how you have to deal with this really frustrating— we got engaged in a war that is not ours to begin with. And this is why I'm saying, when you think about this nuclear commitment, what Donald Trump is saying about the nuclear commitments, oh, we're going to have to figure out this. Because the draft in itself, it included a commitment from Iran to negotiate over suspension of its uranium enrichment program. Well, Iran never agreed to that to begin with, and they shouldn't, and they won't. And the removal of its stockpile from the country. Even though, and I do not know if this is accurate or not, what the US is saying is saying that Iran gave the United States through mediators verbal commitments about the scope of the concession it's willing to make. But at the same time, there is nothing in writing. Given how the system works, if you agree to something, we have to sign on it. We have to agree on it like any, any contract you sign and the other party signs, and that means we both agree on whatever the content of that agreement is. There is none of that here. So are we going to take Trump at his word? No, no, because what you— the way you know this is you look elsewhere what's happening in southern Lebanon. So even though Iran has mentioned to the Americans that the attacks on Israel will have to— on, I'm sorry, the attacks on Lebanon will have to stop. Israel is going and pounding southern Lebanon. But there is one key that I found in this one document because I read it and I'm going to share a link with you, one that really drew my attention. It really got my attention about it. It has to do with the US military presence. And here is what the Iranians have already expressed. US forces that were mobilized in recent months will stay in the region during these 60 days and only withdraw if a final deal is reached. Once again, read between the lines. We have no intentions of negotiating in good faith. So Iran, you better be careful. You better be careful. And I think it's time has come for Iran to move beyond this. And again, it's my opinion. And please, if you disagree with me, express it here on the chat box, because that's what we do in our community. Will I be wrong if I am to tell you or ask you or share my opinion with you that Iran is making a strategic mistake by getting into these negotiations and all this instead of going directly and build the bomb and be done with? That's the way I see the next 10, 15, 20, 25 years. Because what's happening today, if the status quo remain, We will see it again in the next decade or two. That's why. And please share your opinion if you think I'm wrong, because we will be back. We will be back again. And all what we think that, oh, we are negotiating in good faith. No, we're not. We're not. And this is why Iran will have to think strategically about this moving forward. Now, here are the missing piece, the missing pieces about this particular, and even if we can use the term disputed. So this is where it gets murky. Because two sides are essentially telling different stories, meaning the Iranian side and the American side, about what they have agreed upon. And you need to know. It is, it's a right that you have an understanding about really what has been. So I'm going to share the Iran side and I'm going to share the American side and you reach your own conclusion. Iranian state or the Iranian state TV, I'm sorry, the Iranian state TV claimed, and I use the term carefully here, claimed that the draft calls for the US military to withdraw from the vicinity of Iran. Which means what? I'm going to put the map right here. This is what they claiming, that all the military presence will be out of those locations because that's Iran's vicinity right there. And the lift of the blockade by the US on Iranian ports. This is what they're on state TV saying. The White House described Iran's report as a complete fabrication, saying, and I quote, this is what the White House is saying, nobody should believe what Iranian state media is putting out, end of quote. No judgment, we just stating the facts, and we'll reach, uh, conclusions at the end together. Iran also has pushed back hard on the nuclear framing. Like I said earlier, the news agency Fars stated, and I quote, "Iran has made no commitment in its agreement regarding handing over nuclear stockpile, removing equipment, closing facilities, or even pledging not to build a nuclear bomb," end of quote. Iran also wanted sanctions to be a relief up front, the first thing before he moves forward. Iran wanted frozen funds, which amounts to billions and billions of dollars immediately. That goes along with the permanent lifting of sanctions. But the US is insisting on the sanctions remaining. This is what the Iranian side is saying. US, on the other hand, is saying, oh, we've reached a tentative agreement. The Strait of Hormuz is open. And we are back to business. No, no, none of this. Because the bottom line of this MOU, if I may use the term here, is that the ceasefire, it is essential. It's essential that the ceasefire extension is dressed up as a peace framework. That's what the American side are presenting it to, to the rest of the world. Once again, ceasefire extension dressed up as a peace framework. Because what is the purpose of it? Buying 60 days to tackle the truly hard stuff? No, because it will give you the opportunity to rearm, to reposition, to reorganize on both ends. Because many of the terms sort of laid out in the memo will be contingent. Contingent upon one— upon what? Upon the final agreement being reached. We have no guarantees. We have no guarantees. And that is why whatever you hear, it's gonna always leave the door open for the possibility of renewed, uh, war. That's the bottom line to it. You cannot, you cannot buy into this, oh, the deal is going to be reached. What? No, no, no, no, no, no, let's not rush to this. And again, that's why I wanted to do this for you, just to put it on the table and break it down. And of course, you reach your own conclusion into this. So the nuclear question The nuclear question, the whole reason the war started, remains almost entirely deferred to that of known as a second phase. That is how it's been reported. If the truth matters to you, hit like, subscribe, and tap that bell. No spin, no agenda, just the stories they don't want you to know. Don't watch from the sideline. Be part of the movement. Your support keeps the truth alive. Thank you. Now here is the another key question: can Trump defy Israel, uh, Netanyahu? Yeah, some say, what a silly question, Dr. O. No, it's not silly. And usually, by the way, As I used to tell my students in class, in classrooms, there is no stupid question. And I always advised my students, if any type of questions crosses your mind, voice it, express it. Never shy away from that. And this is no different. Can Trump defy David Netanyahu? And by asking this question, You should read between the lines as to who is in charge. That was the purpose of why I am asking this question. Of course, the talks are addressed— the negotiations are addressed by Donald Trump's envoy. Two individuals have no background whatsoever in the world of negotiations or foreign affairs or geopolitics. They just None. So, and here is the thing: Israel doesn't trust those negotiators of who are negotiating on behalf of Donald Trump. Why? It's because Netanyahu has been piecing together back-channel diplomacy behind the US. And how is that happen? It is happening through the intelligence services And that intelligence, guess where it's been gathered? Yes, it is an operational, an intelligence operations. Not that I am privy to its detail, I can't and I don't know. All I know is in a setting like this, it has to be an intel operations going on. And this one that Israel is conducting is gathering the intelligence from Pakistan, from Qatar, from Iran, because they're all involved. And I'm going to share a quote with you. Here is what's been said, and I quote: There is a real concern that Donald Trump will reach a bad deal. Israel is trying to influence it as much as it can. This is what an Israeli official disclosed to a media outlet in Washington. At the same time, Bibi Netanyahu is being cautious about how much pressure to exert. Why? Because he's wary of being perceived as leading Donald Trump back to war. Wait a minute, wait a minute. Why will he be worried about this or wary about it? Because that is exactly what he's been doing. And what is he doing right now? We all know who makes the decisions. It's not Donald Trump. At the same time, this highlighted one key aspect, and then key aspect is that this is Netanyahu's core dilemma. The question is whether he has leverage or not. And by using this leverage too visibly, too openly, he risked alienating his most important partner, Donald Trump, because Donald Trump is the one doing the bidding for Netanyahu. And this is where you see in this reaction, the political one, that is especially from within Israel across the spectrum, because there are now turmoil inside Israel, politically speaking. So especially they're going to be coming up soon to some sort of elections and so forth. So you have the opposition inside Israel. The leader of opposition, Yair Lapid, here is what he's saying, and I quote about this deal: "It's very bad for Israel. It's bad for the region. It's bad for the citizens of Iran." End of quote. And this opposition leader, Lapid, is accusing Netanyahu of failing to influence That's a key word, influence, a better agreement and allowing Washington to negotiate with little Israeli input. It's open and I'm going to share the link with you so you can read it and know where the information came from. There is the link. Even from within Netanyahu's own coalition, You have the, what's his name, the National Security Minister, Itmar Ben-Gvir. What a, what a— It's sad to know that a human being can impose such suffering and pain on other fellow human beings. Doesn't matter Palestinians or not or whatever. It's just the fact that someone has that kind of thinking. Exists, still exists in the 21st century, is mind-boggling. You want to impose this massive pain on another human being. It's just the fact in itself. Think about it, think about it. But anyway, what he— this is what he's saying. He's saying this is bad for a reason. This is bad for Israel. And because it's in a coalition, he is— meaning Bennett Gvir— is calling the proposal an agreement that can harm the state of Israel. Then you have Bibi Netanyahu himself, his own predicament, because the emerging deal represents an existential danger to Netanyahu's political future. Why is this important? Because if he doesn't stay in office, he's gonna have to be in prison for corruption. As long as he is in office, there will be no prison for him. So how do you make that happen? You extend the war. You even go and bomb against the US will, bomb Iran in that case. Because with his coalition now fracturing and the elections are approaching, Netanyahu cannot survive a peace that leaves Hezbollah intact because it's already intact. The other thing that Netanyahu cannot live with is the idea of Iran's nuclear program being— still exist, which is a fact. And that's why this leads me to address for you why you've been hearing about the bombing in southern Lebanon. You need to understand why. Because Lebanon is the spoiler per se. That's Israel's actual response. It's not in words, it's not in negotiations, in dropping bombs. This is the most alarming development while the US is negotiating. And it tells you right there, the US could not tell Israel, stop, don't— they couldn't do that. And even if they do, Israel doesn't. You know now how it is, who dictates the terms. So rather than openly confronting Trump, Israel appears to be using Lebanon as a pressure valve. That's exactly what's going on, essentially trying to sabotage the deal's implementation from the ground up. They don't want that because right after, right after, we're talking about 2, to my knowledge, was about 4 hours, between 2.5 to 4 hours, somewhere around that time. Right after the announcement of Donald Trump that the deal with Iran was largely negotiated, throughout the talks that excluded Israel, Netanyahu ordered the IDF, the Israeli Defense Force, to go ahead and, and I put this in quote, "Increase the blows." against Hezbollah, while at the same time adding and stating that the— we are— we meaning Israel in this case— deepening our operations in Lebanon, end of quote. And that is why Israel went ahead and requested an evac order for two of southern Lebanon's biggest cities, because Israeli aircraft went ahead and struck over 100 cities in southern Lebanon. Those are small villages. So, and that, by the way, just these recent strikes added about 3,000 deaths that now surpassed 3,000 dead people. It's clear. It's very clear. Netanyahu might not be openly willing to defy Donald Trump, right? But Israel will likely use secondary fronts, Lebanon, for one reason and one reason only, to complicate the process and provoke a reaction. Why? Because the objective is to force Washington to abandon the talk. That is the key. That's why I wanted to do this, really couldn't wait, because I am reading in whatever part of the world I'm in here, uh, because I'm not in Spain, by the way, uh, uh, I'm reading stuff. It's like, no, that is not true. That is not true. The media is just, just putting out information. That means— I'm not saying it's misleading, it just, it's not put right. It leaves you with really doubts, paving the way towards, oh, peace is coming, an agreement is within reach between the US and Iran, when in reality there is none of that, none of that. And this is why this matters. It matters because the MOU, the Memorandum of Understanding itself, contains the Lebanese clause in it. So why is Israel going and pounding Southern Lebanon? And that gives you an idea about the structural form of this MOU. Could declare the war in Lebanon is over before the direct talks produce any disarmament, before any mechanism that's been implemented, before any monitoring framework for this, or before any agreement sort of that Hezbollah might accept. So neither diplomatic track includes a mechanism for synchronizing now with the other. In other words, they are disjoint, separate tracks and so forth. And once again, I find myself using history as my guide, and I'm going to take you back to 2025, June 2025, recently heard. Because there is a historical precedent that haunts everyone. If you been following what was going on, and this happened before, the same scenario happened before. You remember June 2025, in a dramatic turn, dramatic turn, Israeli jets struck multiple Iranian nuclear sites just as Donald Trump team was trying to lock in a US Iran nuclear agreement. It was, as Israel quoted, preemptive strike, dubbed as Operation Rising Lion. You remember all that, in which Israel went ahead and targeted some enrichment facilities and so forth. Yeah, my point is this, my point— what is my point? My point is that This demonstrates to you that Israel is willing to unilaterally blow up the American diplomacy when it feels not like it, but because in Tel Aviv they argue, oh, it's our survival. Its survival was at stake or is at stake. And that is why I'm saying there is nothing, nothing structurally preventing this from being repeated again. This is the point that I wanted to make here. So the bottom line to it, to understand it, is that Trump can and clearly intend to maybe cut a deal with Iran, even over the Israelis' objection. I have my doubts, but again, that's my opinion. What is yours? Do you think he can cut a deal with Israel— with, I'm sorry, with Iran over Israel objection? Please just answer in chat box yes or no. So he has economic motives. Okay, meaning Donald Trump, why he will want to cut a deal with Iran. The economic motives is that oil prices in the US going up. And I just made a call yet last night and, and checked on those stuff. So yeah, things going up. You have inflation in U.S., it's going up. And of course, that's the economic part. You have the domestic political ones, the need for a win politically. It doesn't matter. That was the whole idea for Donald Trump going to China. Why do you think he went to China for? Photo ops, standing near President Xi Jinping. It had nothing to do with negotiation. It has nothing to do with addressing the key issues. No, no, no, no, no, no. Donald Trump wanted to have a photo op with President Xi. That, that's exactly what was happening. The win, that is. But When you go on the other side and think about what Israel could use, what powerful tools Israel might have, and it does, unfortunately, the ability to create facts on the ground in Lebanon that makes a deal between the United States and Iran sort of not reached. Okay, I lost you. Did you guys hear what I said earlier? Okay, all right, let me type this. Did you guys hear what I said earlier? Uh, Frozen. Can you guys hear me? Let me— if you hear me, give me a thumbs up. Okay. All right. Hmm. Okay, good. Time to go short. Yeah, back on. All right, good to hear. Did you— I don't know if you guys heard what I was talking about in the conclusion. Okay, all good. Okay, thank you. But did you hear what I was saying in the conclusion, right? That's one thing about connections outside the US, it's challenging. But oh yeah, maybe we need to start using the— the— oh, we don't know if we hear it. We heard it. Okay, well, let me repeat it quickly here, and I'm going to sign off because I don't want to lose any more here. So, so as I said, here is my conclusion for you before I play a clip for you. Whether Donald Trump's deal with Iran becomes a great diplomatic triumph of his presidency, which I don't expect anyway, or whether the deal will collapse under the weight of the Israeli resistance, which I anticipate. The unresolved nuclear demands, the mistrust on all sides, all this, you put this aside and you think of one thing. One thing that is sure is that the next 60 days will certainly reshape the geopolitical and security landscape of the region, West Asia or Middle East, that is, for generations to come. Because you have the fate of millions of people there. You have the price of oil. And you have one thing for sure, the specter of a nuclear war. All of them hang in the balance of a single unsigned document. That is where the key is right now as we speak. So this is the key that I need you to understand. So I'm going to leave you with one question. And the question is, and I would love to have to read your comment, your answer in the comment section. In your opinion, if Donald Trump signs the deal with Iran and keeps his word for that, does that make the world safer, or does it simply delay an even bigger confrontation down the road? That will be the key aspects that you need to understand. So it's very, very, very crucial for that one. All right, let me, let me, uh, let me play cable here. Oh, I saw Noel. Noel, I want to say thank you for your Super Sticker. And once again, Noel, I remember last time you, you put a Super Sticker during my, my live stream and I didn't see it because it didn't show after I logged out. So, so once again Thank you so much for your continued support, Noel. Truly, truly appreciate you for that. Okay, let me, let me play a clip for you if I could. Once again, it's the, the copy, and I'm gonna do a translation for you. It's very brief, it's just something written on a screen, and I'm gonna share it with you and I'll do the translation for you. Share screen. All right, let me see if you can— yeah, you guys can see that one. Here is what it says: Basically what it's saying, the Secretary of Treasury, the US Secretary of Treasury, has threatened the Oman with sanctions. The US administration has no friends, it has only Israel and Netanyahu. It began a war that has now impacted the security of its— the security and economy of its allies. And here he is now, the United States, threatening one of the GCC countries, a country that has a good relationship with the United States, a country— in reference to Oman— that has not been involved in any activities against the United States. Did you guys get the message? That's exactly what it says. Hal wasala terisala. Was the message received? Was the message delivered? That's what it is. So I just wanted to share that with you. I want you to see that. I have— I do have another clip that I want to play quickly here, uh, if I could, uh, No, I can't because it wouldn't work here. But basically what it says, it's about despite the ongoing of Donald Trump's deal with Iran, which there is no deal. Let me just emphasize this one. Israel penetrated Iran airspace with Orbiter 5 stealth drones. That's what it did. And once again, I'm going to try to see if I can show you this one, because it's worth your time to see if we could. But again, it's, it's circulating. Yeah, it's uploading. It's not, it's not going, so, so I'm not going to waste time on this one.