Unbelievable Secret EXPOSED! Find Out - Truth or Lies?

All right, hello everybody and welcome to Geopolitical Trends. So good to be with you as always. I had a little hiccup with connection here, so first of all, I want to make sure you guys can hear me. If you can give me a thumbs up that the sound— that you can hear me, I will truly appreciate it. So I'm gonna wait till I see a thumbs up from any of you. Uh, and I know there is a delay into how this is sent. Okay, thumbs up. Thank you so much, House Toby. Thank you so much for— so good to be with you guys. I am gonna keep this short this time around here, uh, but like before I always start, we're gonna be, uh, uh, like I always do, talk about few things, but there are some other issues I need to share with you. And the reason why I need to share with you, because we are in a community, so you need to know what's going on. Before I'll do all this, first of all, I want to thank the members, uh, for their continued support, all of you of course. But I also want to give a shout out to a new member, uh, by the name Black Raven. Thank you so much for becoming a member, so I truly appreciate it. Today's topic, we'll be talking about the leak of the classified documents from the Pentagon. So how true is it? Okay, because there are about 2 or 3 key questions you need to know despite what you're going to be hearing. First, first, first question is who's benefiting from this? Who's benefiting from this leak? Uh, second one is who is leading the investigation? This might give you a hint as to how things are working. And the third one is the President of the United States aware of this leak? Because that is a fair question to ask. So, but before I'll do all this, there are two key questions I need you— I need your input on. One of them is one of our viewers in the community. I don't know if he's a subscriber or not, or she, whatever. The name is Francis Leong. He put, and I'll share it with you, he said, David, as much as I enjoy your videos, I'd rather you don't include health promotion. Okay, first of all, it's not a health promotion, it's a health tip that I share with you. Those are my personal experiences. Second thing that I want to put before you guys is, how about if we put it into vote? If you can please on the chat room— if on the chat box rather— if you would like me to keep doing the health tip, please put yes. If you don't please put no. And I'm gonna count later on and we'll come to an agreement, all of us, because that's how I look at it. It's a community, your input matters. And for somebody to just be saying something, it's his opinion and I respect it, so no offense to that. Now there is another individual here who is either a troll, okay, or is, uh, a bot. I'm not gonna even say the name because it's not worth it. And he wrote, I said, and I quote here, I hate that give your information without money, blah blah, without filling words that are 90% of what you speak. You are unable to communicate clearly, end of quote. Well, you can just see the comments for somebody like that. First of all, I hope he's a real person, and if he is, I'd rather not have him in our community because to me it's, it's not worth it. So just be aware of this kind of comments, guys. So again, you are entitled to express your opinion anyway, but if there is nonsense, I will not tolerate that, nor will I deal with it. That's how, that's how I operate. The third one, and I need you to know because it's community, uh, it's coming from Christopher Bonk, and he said, David, with due respect, you tend to deviate a lot from the main topics and too much grandstanding. Once again, if you guys think that I do this, let me know in the chat room and we'll change that. Uh, my sense is this individual does not understand, has grasp of what geopolitics is all about. You can't be taking one topic without thinking about the big picture. This is the short-sightedness. And if we are to build this community where we can communicate, this has no place in this community, sorry to say, but that's how it is. So Anyway, enough of this negativity. Let's move on into the real topic here. But before this, I'm gonna share one picture with you guys because I need you to tell me what do you see in this picture. Check this out. Can anybody tell me what you see in this picture? Just put in a chat room, okay? And we'll talk about it later. So, so let's move on to talk about the Pentagon, the classified information about the Pentagon. So that is very, very crucial information here. Oh, first of all, I need to say thank you to Lovers of the Russian team. Much appreciate your support. I truly, truly appreciate it. Um, I also want to acknowledge and give a shout out to, uh, yeah, Anna Kiblis. Thanks again for your support. And to Lover of Russian, you said, I love your channel. Thank you so much. And it's people like you guys, all of you, it's what keeps me going. So this is why I have no tolerance for nonsense. When individuals start put spewing nonsense, I, I hope they can unsubscribe. I, I care less for that stuff like that. So it's not worth our time. Anyway, let's move on to what we're gonna cover here. And as I said, uh, we're gonna be talking about the Pentagon. Okay, I'm gonna show— share a picture with you here, right here. That's Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin right here, and that's Mike Milley, a 4-star general for the Joint Chief of Staff. So, so the question that is now many are wondering, okay, many are wondering about that. Uh, the, the most media is saying it's a, it's a cache of classified Pentagon documents. Oh, hold on a second. Some media, the, the Washington Post, I think they mentioned about 50 documents, which is not true. Others are saying 300 documents, which is not true, at least based on what I found. And I know where to look for this kind of information. I used to work in Washington. I understand how this process works. So that's how I look at it. There were about 10 to 12 documents That's about it. And the question is not about the quantity of documents or whatever, is what's in them and how this came to be. Of course, they are saying, uh, that has to do with, uh, one of them mentioned about possible assassinations of both Ukraine president and the Russian president, which is just nothing but hypes, no more, no less. There's another one that suggests the, uh, spying on South Korea. And even if it's true, what does South Korea expect, or any other allies for that matter? You know, that's what the United States does. You know, I recall I was still in DC, and at that time, yeah, it was mind-boggling that we were sort of— we, when I say we, the government at that time, because I was still associated with the government, you know, listening to Angela Merkel's cell phone. Yeah, we do spy on allies. I'm sure the allies do it to us too. They spy on the US. But, but that's not the point here. What I want you to understand and ask yourself a question, and the question you need to ask yourself is, why now? Why this leak happens now? Okay, and like I said at the beginning, who's benefiting from it? I gotta turn this light on here because— oh, there we go. Uh, who's benefiting from that? That is one of the questions you need to ask because that's a legitimate question. The one thing that you need to understand always, when there's a clear leak of classified information, sometimes it's intentional, for purpose. The government knows it. When I say the government, there will only be few people. And this is why, this is why in this case of this classified information here— let me say thank you to the classified information in this case. And the question that I'm going to ask for you Or I ask you, and you can leave the, uh, response on the chat box if you like. Do you believe this was an intelligence operation? What do you think? Because I'm going to give you some examples as part of what was leaked and put it in a context for you. Then you reach your own conclusion for that. Okay, one of the documents mentioned about the US spying on Israel. Okay, but the classification on that particular document, it says at the top FISA. FISA stands for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which means what? That means the DOJ, the Department of Justice, that means a judge of sort, sort of federal level, has to approve either the wiretapping the listening, whatever that is, you know. Then you start asking yourself, yourself, how come a 21-year-old guardsman will have access to that level? I used to hold security clearance at the highest level, you know. It's just you go through the process. I didn't get that the first day when the Pentagon called me to join the military, and I was in the military intelligence back then. And no, you go through the process. That's just how it works. And of course, with its classification, because some people think that the highest is the top secret. No, there are about 4 or 5 other levels above that, including TK, including G, including B. Those are classified terminologies. And this is mind-boggling as to a 21-year-old guardsman in, in, uh, I think Fort Bragg, whatever he— where he was stationed. Will have access to very highly sensitive information like that. That's why they call them the SCI, the sensitive compartment information. So when you think about a document, document that says we are spying on Israel, and at the same time it has the classification of FISA, ah, that doesn't bode well. How a person like this will have access to this information? Second thing you need to consider, and if, if we are to think about it as an intelligence operation, you know, how come all of a sudden this classified information ends up among gamers on the Discord? You know, how did that information make it over there? You know, unless someone at the higher-ups handed the information to the naive 21-year-old and just follow through with it. No, second thing that you need to understand, it was one particular document that has classification of the, uh, Central Intelligence Operational Center. That one, it's only for the agency. Inside. That doesn't get disseminated outside. Nobody has access to that. As a matter of fact, majority in the military will not have access to that. There's only few that will be cleared at that level by the agency. That's another, uh, red flag to start to think about. Was this leak intended for something else or what? And again, You have to see the big picture. Why now? And who's benefiting from it? And did the president of the United States knew about it? You know, usually with how President Biden is with his mental capabilities, no offense to elderly or whatever, it just— he might not even be aware. He might even forgot, you know, that, that, that's happened, that, that happens. There's the possibility of that. The other aspects of it has to do with South Korea. South Korea found out that the United States is spying on them. Well, it's— I'm not laughing out of laughing, but you know, it's kind of what do you expect, you know? And now to the point that South Korea is not even talking about it. Now, if you are South Korea, an official in South Korean government, won't you inquire about this? I will, because that's how it works. That's what needs to be done. The other main concern for all this that you need to keep in mind is— I mean, for us to answer the question, why now at this time? Could it be that the United States government is preparing the American people for what's lying ahead, what's coming down the pipe? You know, from the Ukraine, uh, uh, conflict to China tensions to now Philippines expansion of military bases, you know, is this a way of leaking this information to— like I said earlier, there is sometimes a reason why the government will allow the leak of— yes, it might be a damage there, a minor one. It's to the government's thinking, it will be worth it. Because now you are, first of all, preparing the population. Second, you're creating a distraction where the mass is not gonna, whoa, classified information. But because this young individual, 21-year-old, is no Edward Snowden, is no Chelsea Manning, it's not a whistleblower, it's not, you know, 21-year-old doesn't— maturity level is not there yet. And yet you ask yourself that question. A 21-year-old will have access to a level above top secret. That just doesn't, doesn't add up. It just does not add up. So, and as I said again, there are those who saying, uh, no, no, no, no, this is true. Ah, don't jump to conclusions till to understand. One of them, it says that, uh, the United States, uh, it's, it's sort of penetrated the Russian defenses, uh, which I won't buy that argument knowing what I know. And again, I worked in Washington, I was aware of how things work. That is unlikely. The reason being because Russian intelligence agencies are very, very, very good at what they do. I'm not saying we're not, it's just, uh, it's no different than the Chinese. You know, Europeans, give or take. This is why you always see the coordination of matters of intelligence between Europe and the United States, especially the UK, you know. But for something like this, all of a sudden you have the US spying on Israel, spying on South Korea. Yes, it might happen, but something doesn't sound right. This is again what you have to think in terms of, okay, like I put in the title, is it truth or is it fiction? What is really the motives for why the United States government released this kind of, uh, uh, or allow the leak of this kind of information? The other aspects you need to think about, it has to do with— it was a— I saw, I saw, uh an image, a photographed papers, okay? And the paper— when— let me get a paper here. Usually when you see a paper, you know, this is straight, right? If it is folded, you're gonna see the sort of the, uh, where the line is where the paper has been folded. Now, if you think about classified information that's been folded like this, that means someone has to carry that. Because once again, when they are mentioning about, oh, that's from the Central Intelligence Operational Center, uh-uh, because the Central Intelligence Agency has its own servers. They don't operate, they are not connected to anything else. So that leaves the question, this leak had to be ordered by someone way up. And when I say way up, who are we talking about? We're talking about the national, uh, the Director of National Intelligence. That's the highest office for the intelligence community in the United States, which is comprised of about 16 agencies for a budget of about, uh, a total of about $92 billion. Each one of them, each agency has its own, uh, there are some of them are classified I can't discuss that. Uh, it's just that's how it works. So if the higher-ups, somebody in the higher-ups in the National, uh, in the Director of the National Intelligence Office was aware of this or has contributed to this, then it must be some specific motives for that, you know. And again, As one who's been around, or both, in the military side, in the intelligence side, and policy side, you kind of learn over time, over the years, how things work. Because what— the way I see it, this is like an op that took place, but it went the wrong direction. A 21-year-old would not have access to this kind of stuff. He or she has to work his way up to reach that level. So now, the idea of, uh, could it be because— and once again, we're just thinking outside the box here. That's usually how you have to approach intelligence matters, think outside the box. And like I said earlier, could it be that the US government is preparing the population, the Americans, for what's coming? What's, what's going to be landing on the American landscape? From, again, the Ukraine war to China tensions to Philippines and so forth, to the BRICS, to the gold, to the financial, to the dollar, you name it. There are a lot, a lot of moving parts. And when you have When you have, for example, uh, uh, the revelation about the degree of US surveillance of Russia, that leaves you with one question. And again, I am closer to Ukraine, I'm in a neighboring country, and you kind of see and feel and you observe how things are. Versus how it is being reported, you know. And again, I have some pictures down the road. For now, I decided not to post those yet. So becomes the question: is the government doing this because they are seeing the outcome of the conflict going another direction that they didn't anticipate? Given, for example, which is true, it's facts, that Ukraine is running out of ammunition. Ammo. No more ammo in Ukraine, to the point that the EU now is— wants to allocate $1 billion for ammo. Could it be this what the leak was all about? It's just to sort of move the attention away from the real issue, where the shortcomings of the West is going to be, or is Same thing when I said last time that the documents showed that or revealed the degree to which the US has penetrated the Russian Ministry of Defense. Ah, I just won't buy that argument. I just won't buy it. That's why I am more— and again, this is my personal opinion— I am more convinced as the day goes by that this was nothing but a, but just an op. That didn't go the right way. There is no way, there is no way that's going to happen. So now the other question we need to ask ourselves is, who's going to be benefiting from this, or who is benefiting from this? And the reason I'm, I'm, uh, the reason I'm saying this, I have, uh, I did find something specific that I wanted to share with you in the TE document. Okay, T1. And the, uh, the, uh, the information that I wanted to share with you here has to do with, again, who's benefiting from it and who's going to be conducting the investigation, because now it's going to be investigation. That's how it works. You know, it's, it's a process, it's better. So, and if you think about who's leading the investigation, who do you think is leading the investigation for this? Can anybody type in based on your just basic understanding? When you have a leak of classified document from the Pentagon, okay, who do you think will have to take the lead into investigation? Let me see if you guys can type some answers on the chat box here. And I know it gets delayed by the time you answer the question. Uh, okay, uh, uh, Hong Long, you said CIA, FBI. Uh, that is Usually that's what you would expect, but no, not necessarily. CIA would not get involved in this investigation right here. No. The question becomes, uh, let's say, I just say the White House, DOD. Jack Roberts, you're saying DOD? Uh, uh, not necessarily. The reason being because DOD does not have the authorization to arrest people on American soil unless the individuals are of a military belong to the military. So that leaves you with, with two, two options. Uh, yeah, you got, you got that right, uh, Steph Lynn, you got that right. It's the DOJ, Department of Justice. So why do you think that is? Now, if you only think, excuse me, about the link between the White House and the Department of Justice No, you can see why the Department of Justice would want to take a lead into the investigation. Why? Because they can structure the narrative according to what the White House wants. So with all this, the beneficiary of it is going to be the White House because DOD cannot conduct an investigation. Yeah, it can conduct internally, but that's completely separate. And Department of Defense has its own investigative tools within, like for example, uh, uh, uh, you think about Air Force. Air Force has the OSI, Office of Special Investigation. You take up— you think about the Army CID, the Criminal Investigative Division, you know, each one of them. But for something like this, no, no, DOJ is taking the lead on it because they are interested in how the narrative is going to be structured. No, that's like no different than what it was a few months ago. And I, I don't know whether you remember or not when, uh, they said that the president— President Biden, that is— found classified documents in his garage. What happened after that? Because DOJ, Department of Justice, took the lead on the investigation. Did you hear anything about it after that? No. That is one of the big concerns for all this. Because now DOJ is going to be taking the lead into that, and that is very, very concerning. Okay, that's one. The other aspect has to do with, again, how this is going to now impact the relations, or, or, or, or, yeah, relations with allies, but also what it's going to do to American foreign policy. Because there's a lot at stake, and this doesn't happen in a vacuum. You know, when you think about, uh, what's going to be happening soon, within a few months, about the outcome of Ukraine, what's going to be happening soon about the tensions with China, you know, the government thinking in terms— we have to prepare the population for this because we do have presidential elections coming up. Yeah, and this is why I'm saying something is not right about how this has been conducted. You know, an individual like that, you know, 21-year-old, would not have access to a SCIF. SCIF stands for the Sensitive Compartmental Information Facility. Because in the, in that facility or that SCIF, usually you're dealing with the very highly sensitive information above top secret level. And this is where you start to think about the idea of even the investigation should give you a hint as to, uh, why is the Department of Justice but not the DOD or the FBI? Because FBI will have the authority to arrest individuals on American soil or even abroad, depending. Again, you know, the problem with the DOD, if they would have conducted the investigation, is because the Secretary of Defense will have oversight over investigators, which means the investigators will not end up doing what they're supposed to do because the chain of command If an order comes from the top, that's it. And this is where it's problematic. And that's why I wanted to come on the air and share this with you, because you need to understand, I can— I was aware of this about a week and a half ago, what was going on. But it was the idea of let's not rush into this, you know. You're gonna have to take a step back and think through, you know, what is the logic of this, you know. I kind of had to assess certain things, evaluate a few things. Before I'll come on the air and share it with you. So this is the way how I see this moving forward. So anytime you hear the leak or not— now, as far as do we spy on allies, yes we do. It's nothing new. We've been doing it for— the allies also, if they could, they— but most likely they don't succeed much, you know. Uh, it's because you think about it in, in this way, guys, uh, for— and this is why, uh, there's been some challenge. For example, and I'm gonna bring, uh, uh, one topic now, now for somebody who might say, oh, he deviates a lot from talking about the topics. I, I feel sorry for individuals like that. They can't think outside the box, too narrow. So, but, but what you do What do you do, guys? You forgive. You just forgive. You know, they don't know intellectually. The level, it's not where it needs to be. So you forgive. Uh, what I was gonna say, you bring the— I bring the issue of TikTok. You know, what did you hear in your, in your part of the world? I'm assuming you— maybe your government didn't put a ban on TikTok. Why? Because the first word that came out of that, what has to do with with the spying part. You know what this one has to do basically also with having a different— does not operate through American system per se. For example, you think about internet, everything has to go through the cables that connect between the US and Europe, you know. And this is where you see that challenge of why we are very concerned about how China's moving technologically. I, I'll tell you, just yesterday I came across an article from overseas, and this pertains to space, that China now is able— here it is, guys— China now is able to create 100% oxygen in its space station, you know. And what was the article that was translated into the English here? Said? It said, and I put this in quote, the alleged, you know, because that's how usually when you read an article here, it always has the possibility, they allege, and things like that. So why is this? Is to put doubt into your mind. So why? Because we're concerned that now China has advanced when it comes down to space. It's no different than when it comes down to technological stuff on Earth right here. And this is why when you come across issues like this, put it within the bigger picture, the great context of it, because it will make— it will make more sense to you, understanding first of all the timing of it, second who's benefiting from it and why. You know, like I always say, most American— most of us Americans might, might not pay a close attention to something. All they hear is classified information. And that's it. Oh my gosh, that's— when in reality, because leaks are part of how the system is in the United States, you know, I, I witnessed some when I was in Washington, DC. It was intended for it to be a leak for a reason, to move the narrative one direction or another. British MI5 and MI6 do the same. The, the German intelligence service, the Dutch, they do it, the French, you know, maybe the Chinese do it as well. Uh, their system operates slightly different based on what I know. So, and, and this is why I just want you to understand this within the bigger picture. So anyway, that's all I have to share with you guys today. I don't like to just ramble. For, uh, uh, for whatever, with no, uh— I dropped my glasses here. There we go. Uh, so let me— I'm gonna take a look, see if you guys have any questions. Uh, by the way, I just want to give you a heads up that the entire crew of the Geopolitics in Conflict is here, so you're gonna be seeing, uh, a live stream on, on the other channel very, very, very soon. So stay tuned to that because there are some key information, uh, that— or key topics rather. We decided, you know, the whole team here, uh, we decided to go ahead and do them as live streams. So it's worth your time, uh, uh, and we'll post it and all that. So, all right, let me see some questions here, uh, since I have one in front of me right here from Jack. I may as well start with that. So, question: so the US is increasing surveillance and creating a McCarthy-type feeling in the state while moving away from Russia and trying to face China within the next 2 years? That's a good question, Jack. And yes, I would have to concur with your assessment on this. It's because when you start— it's because some of us Americans are slow to react to things. Because we don't pay much attention. So the government, in my thinking, with something like this is to have to do it like in drips, slowly, you know, you kind of, what's the word I'm looking for, you manipulate the thinking of the population slowly. If you throw all of them at once, no, it's going to be a pushback. You look no further than what happened with the pandemic and all that stuff. Everything took one step at a time, slowly. This is no different. And yes, I do see it that way because, uh, there are some major developments, and I'm not going to, uh, spoil it for you because we want to leave this for a live stream. There are some major developments, uh, in the works right now inside the government, US government that is, uh, and that pertains to Taiwan and China. It's all I can say at this point. So, all right, let me see. And by the way, guys, before I forget, make sure you type in where you're joining me from here. I always like to take a look at that. So I'm gonna go to the top and see if there are any questions there. So, and by the way, remember please to either say yes or no to the health tips that I always share with you, and I am open to your, suggestions. So because we are in the community here, so all right, I'm scrolling down here just to see if there are— oh, somebody put NATO breakup. Uh, that's Steph Lynn. I don't see it happening right now. It's not gonna— it will be a while. It'll be a while. So Oh, oh, thank you for sharing this, uh, some— you said, David, for hair loss, zinc supplements work wonders. Thank you, I appreciate you sharing this with all of us. So, and again, guys, you think about it, community, you look after each other. That— this is why I kind of don't like this individuals just saying nonsense. You know, don't like it, go somewhere else. Go watch some silly stuff, it will do your brain good. All right, question here from, you know, uh, let me see here. All right, well, I don't see any question. Let me say Thank you to, uh, Tommy Putra from Jakarta. Good to have you here. Steph Lynn, Canada. Yeah, and Judea, uh, oh, and June, and June Adip from Malaysia. Hong Long from London, UK. Good to have you guys join me here. So, uh, let me see here. Oh, no question, Crypto Coral, just thank you. Well, you are most welcome. So You are most welcome. I truly, truly appreciate you guys. So, all right guys, I'm gonna sign off here, uh, because I've been having some issues with, with, with internet here. But anyway, it's working so far. So, uh, once again, just to summarize all this for you guys, you know, don't read too much into what you've been hearing about this stash of, uh, uh, uh, uh, you know, documents and all They were about 10 to 12 documents, that's about it. And even those will have to be selected certain ways. So to me, I reached the conclusion, and again, this is my personal opinion, that it was an intelligence operation, if I may use the term. Uh, it's just because the, the preparation for what's coming. That's the way I see it. You know, I just won't buy into— because there are certain aspects of the classified documents and systems that are very well protected. So, and again, I'm talking from experience, so this is not on the top of my head. So, well, I wish you guys a good evening, uh, because it is evening, it is nighttime here for me in Poland. So, and I look forward to seeing you next time. As always, guys, remember, geopolitics impacts your daily life in more ways than one. Till next time, guys, bye-bye.