"Under the Microscope: The Ursula von der Leyen Pfizer Bribe Scandal"

All right, hello everybody and welcome to Geopolitical Trends. My name is David Oualaalou. Good to be with you as always, very excited to be here. Uh, I got a great show for you today because we're gonna be talking about Uh, how should I put it? A bribe case that's been swept under the rug. So that's what we're going to be talking about today. So, but before I'll do all that, like always, I want to make sure the sound is— I tested it, it's working perfect according to the computer. I saw the, the light going up, that means the sound, it's, it's, uh, transmitting from the mic into the computer. So Please give me thumbs up just to make sure. Once again, I learned my lesson from last time. So, but before I'll do anything, like I always do, I like to express my sincere thanks to the channel's members and supporters and to all of you subscribers. And if this is your first time here, please subscribe so you can show your support for this channel if you feel like it. You're under no obligation. So I'm gonna give a shout out to new channel members and supporters. So I'm gonna start with the members first. I give a shout out to TC, thank you very much for becoming a channel's member. I also give a shout out to Stephen Smalridge, thank you so much for becoming a channel's member. And I also give a shout out to our latest member, is Hup Yoh, I hope I pronounced it correctly. Yoh, it's Y-E-O-H. So thank you for becoming a channel's members. I also want to give a shout out to the channel supporters. Uh, uh, I'll give a first shout out to Energy Wise. Thank you for becoming, uh, channel supporters. And the last person to, to, to whom I will give a shout out is Graham Kerr. Thank you very much for becoming channel supporters. And once again, thank you all, guys, for— without you, it would be no channel, straightforward. So that's the way I look at it. Just FYI, I'm still holding my promise that once we reach 100 members, I'm gonna do an exclusive Q&A for the channel's members, you know, because it's only fair, guys. So we are now at 47. I'm gonna give you a challenge, and the challenge is How about if we reach 100 by the end of this month? You guys think, can we— I mean, can we do it? I'll let you think about that. So once again, today's topic, we're gonna be talking about European Commission defiant— listen carefully— European Commission defiant over the European Commissioner, uh, uh, Vander, uh, Vander Lane Ursula von der Leyen, uh, Pfizer's bribe case. Actually, in this case here, for the defense, is about some text messages, and I'll provide you the detail. So the question we will ask— any person will ask that question— is, was, was Ursula von der Leyen on the take? What do you guys think? But please don't jump to conclusions yet. So that's why It's nice to do this topic to put things in perspective. Want to jump into conclusions here. The second question we need to ask, which I will provide detail about, is how far is Pfizer's corruption has gone. You will be amazed because I have a record that goes back some over 10 years, and I'll provide you all that information. So, so let me check back on to make sure that DC, a thumbs up from— oh yeah, Alba back, thank you very much. Ronnie, thank you very much. Coach Ohoi, hi to you as well. KRT, thank you very much. Yan Hakor, thank you very much. So the sound working perfectly, so we're gonna move on because I got a lot to cover on this one here. So now, uh, oh, by the way, I'm gonna do a tour around the world for you briefly. There are 2 or 3 items I need to share with you. So, so let's start with the first one. Let me, let me pull up the, the picture for you because I always like to share pictures with you so you'll, you'll see what I'm talking about here. And this one has to do with right here, the Wagner, Wagner Group. Yeah, Wagner fighters are now training, uh, uh, army soldiers in Belarus. So I'll let you reach your conclusion. And by the way, which, uh, the media is not disclosing in detail, it was a meeting between the head of the Wagner and the Russian President Vladimir Putin. The Kremlin confirmed this. I checked it with people who are very familiar with this topic. So there was a meeting over there, and as a matter of fact, Wagner now is gonna— has already decided to turn over its weapons and ammo to the Russian military or defense ministry. Yep. So despite what you hear from the West, that's a different story. So second one has to do with this one, which is very sort of good and bad, you know. This one has to do with the— and here's the thing— aimed at US-Japanese dispute with China. ASEAN— listen carefully— ASEAN foreign ministers warn of rising tensions in the region because they just concluded the foreign ministers meetings of the, of the ASEAN, which just concluded in Indonesia's capital Jakarta yesterday. So, and that's— here is the interesting thing, it was with the participation of the America and Russia, both of them, despite differences and all that, they were there. And, uh, the exchange, uh, sort of, uh, this is why ASEAN took stand about it, to make sure that, uh, uh, well, we don't want to be pulled into the, uh, increasing tensions that's going on. As a matter of fact, I am thinking about doing a topic about, or a video rather, about this, this particular topic. There's something that came out of it Very troubling. And this one has to do with India refusing to sign. Yes, it's surprising. India refusing to sign this, this one for the SCO, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, refusing to sign the Economic Development Strategy for 2030. I'll get into that soon, but for now, uh, I just wanted to share this with you. Soon. And the third one, the third item has to do with this prime minister who took stand for his country. You guys saw the video. I appreciate your comments and so forth. So, uh, yeah, he's taking stand. This one is not about that. This one is about him warning— he's warning Europeans of— and the world for that matter— of World War III. If Ukraine join NATO. As you might notice, my conversation yesterday with Scott Ritter on the other channel— I'm, by the way, I'm gonna have him on this channel as well. So I'll, uh, I'll coordinate with— he's a busy man, and I'll coordinate with him, but I will have him on this channel. So, so this is what Orbán is warning about, which— because it's very, very, very concerning. So, and, uh, so Let's jump in into our topic. And the— our topic, let me show you a picture here. Here she is. Uh, from now on, I'm just going to refer to her as, uh, uh, UDL Ursula von der Leyen, or UVL, UVL Ursula von der Leyen. And that's the chairman of the— or CEO of Pfizer. So I'm gonna get into this, but I'm gonna start also with a quote from this. Money— this is a quote— money is not the key to life, or is not the key in life. There is something called a line of integrity that must not shift based on money, etc., end of quote. And this one was written by none other than Dr. Paul Alexander, so you can look him up. I, I just found it very, very interesting. So, and by the way, guys, I need to also recognize something before I'll delve deeper into this. Yesterday when we had the, uh, the— when I had the, uh, conversation with the Scott Ritter, uh, I know some of you put some super stickers and I couldn't acknowledge it in the middle of because I didn't want to interrupt his talk because as an interviewer you kind of learn the protocol, and I've, I've been doing this long enough to know how things work. So I didn't mean to ignore that, and I'm going to recognize that here, and I will do it again on the other channel next time. So I want to recognize 3 individuals. Boone, who is the channel's members on both, by the way. I want to recognize also Osiris, thank you so much for your Super Sticker. And I want to acknowledge and thank Jennifer Lee for the Super Stickers. So I truly appreciate it. I saw it, but I couldn't interrupt because that's just the protocol, especially with the setting like this. And I know how Scott works because we both— we, we communicate, we talk offline. So, but I want to acknowledge what Boone wrote. Boone wrote, and I quote, happy to see Scott here after his goodwill trip to Russia. It's great to see a true soldier fighting for peace and understanding. Thank you, sir. End of quote. Uh, Boone also wrote another one for the second Super Sticker, and he wrote, and I quote, here is to having Scott here, a true warrior who fought more for peace. I am really happy to hear you talk about your trip to Russia to talk to people. We need more people like you on this Earth. Sir, end of quote. So, so I thank you very much, uh, Boone, for your kind— and I am gonna share those with— I'm sure Scott can see it, but Scott doesn't have time to go through all this. I'm gonna share it with him personally, uh, I'll text him this personally. So I want to say thank you to you. So now let me also— I need to make a comment on the last video I made on both channels, one about India I'm reading the comments and really the individuals who spewing, spewing lies basically that I am being paid to say, but that's nonsense and that's stupidity. So please don't waste the community members' time for them to be reading that nonsense and refrain from that. So whomever is writing this nonsense, you know, when I being paid by anybody, I I don't speak on behalf of anybody. I speak about what's right and what's true. End of story. Apparently it was too hard for some to digest what I had to talk about. I have nothing against India. As a matter of fact, I'm going to share a personal story with you. So few years ago, around 2010, 2011, I was on my way to Canada. In the summertime, and I got this phone call and they left a message, and the message was, hey sir, the IRS agents are looking for you because you didn't pay your taxes, whatever, which is a lie anyway. So I thought it was, well, one of those scams. I let it go, and the calls keep repeating, keep repeating, till I returned back home. And one day I decided to answer that, and the person was online And I could tell, and again, I'm not pointing fingers, but the accent was from Bahujor in India. Sorry. And I said, what are you talking about? Okay, so I kept the person on phone. Of course, he didn't know what I was doing, so I kept him on the phone till I locked in the time that I needed for the call to be traced. Okay, I sent the letter, I hung up and said, okay, thank you very much. I hang up the phone. What was interesting around that time, 2010, 2011, there were a lot of phone scam calls to elderly here in America scamming them for money. So I wrote a letter, sent it to Washington, disclosed the location where the call came from, and before you know it, 3 weeks later, it was a raid on that place. 60 in India were arrested by joint operations between the FBI and Indian authorities, and I never received a call ever since. So I'll let you guys draw your own conclusion. But for those individuals who are spewing lies, you know, me being paid by— no, no, no, no, no, it's nonsense. So I addressed the facts. India, for example, now will not support a BRICS currency that is commodity-based. What does it tell you? India also refused to sign the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, SCO, Economic Development Strategy for 2030. It just concluded. So I'm even thinking of doing a video on this. What do you guys think? If you like me to do a video on this in which I will detail, I'll be happy to. Just leave me either yes or no on the chat box, so I will appreciate it. So All right, let's, let's get on, on our topics because that's what we are here to talk about. And once again, we're gonna, uh, sort of not jump to conclusions and not judge. We're gonna just lay out the facts. And of course, for me, I can't reach a conclusion for you guys. I'm presenting the facts and let you reach that. So, so today, the discussion you and I, we're gonna have, all of us, the community It's on an important and unfolding issue because it's still unfolding, except that the investigation was swept under the rug. What investigation are we talking about here? You have to go back to 2020 during the madness of the, uh, of the pandemic and so forth. So of course I'm not going to be saying certain names here because remember, remember, censorship is real. Even for a democratic country like ours. So what happened back then? It was some deal between European Commission and Pfizer company. So, so, and this issue of the bribes per se has captured international attention. So what happened after that? The European Union, which is to me, if they are to claim, known for its commitment to democratic values and the rule of law finds itself grappling with allegations of corruption. Yeah, corruption, you know. And those are not mere whispers, those are facts. Those are not whispers in the wind per se, but the charges were directly— or directed towards the high profile figures within the European Commission. Which one are we talking about? The commissioner Ursula von der Leyen, the former defense minister of Germany who became the European Commissioner. And wait until I tell you the secret what she is planning. I'll keep that for later on. So, so the— she is the president of the European Commission, and of course the case involve her And the— let me get you the picture of the Pfizer. Oh, let me say thank you to— oh, KL, thank you so much for your Super Sticker. Truly appreciate it. It's easier for me to do it when I'm by myself here, except it's hard when I am doing an interview with the guest and so forth. So, so thank you so much, KL. Truly appreciate it. So here's the picture of, uh the Pfizer CEO. That's his picture. And once again, here is that picture between the two of them talking. And again, we're just saying they're talking. We don't know the details, but you will— I'm gonna provide you the, the inside information for you to put that picture together. But once again, you reach your conclusion. So, so that idea of, uh, uh, one of the Pfizer, one of the world-leading pharmaceutical companies. Well, you all know why, because of the medications, right? You know, why do you think, why do you think pharmaceuticals are after, uh, where after the pandemic and so forth? It's because profit. This is where you see a company like this, and look at the background here, you You all can read, right? The WEF, you all can read. But if you put the, the, the pieces together as to what companies like Pfizer— and again, I am not pointing fingers at Pfizer, I don't do that kind of nonsense. I'm presenting the facts. And if people have a hard time accepting this, then that becomes on them, not me. That means They just not able to handle the truth, simple as that. So, so for Pfizer, in coordination with evil Bill, of course, and the World Economic Forum, which we all know what they are aiming for, the global reset or the Great Reset. So, and again, we're not going to be talking about that because that's not the key topic here. The idea is that Why? It's like what happened for us here in the US, the investigation. And here I was in Washington, so the investigation about 9/11, what happened to it? Can anybody tell me? So without— of course, we're not talking classified stuff. I can't talk classified stuff. So basically, the, uh, let me see if any of you put the answer over there. Sometimes it's nice to read your comments or answers, and I know it takes a while for this to come up, so, so I'm gonna just keep moving, guys, and we'll, we'll, we'll get back to it. So, so the idea of that the investigation on the— about 9/11 was swept under the rug, so the family of the 3,000 people that died didn't get justice. So it's no different than this case here. In this case, we're talking about, uh, the investigation of Ursula— of, uh, Ursula von der Leyen herself was swept under the rug. Because here's the thing, the EU watchdog, the European Union— make sure to make a distinction between the European Commissioner or the European Commission and the European Union. Okay, so the European Union watchdog entrusted with maintaining the transparency and integrity of the union has found its investigation— because that's the one that conducted the investigation of, uh, Ursula von der Leyen— so it found itself thwarted at every turn. Why? Because he was delving deeper into the matter as to really what took place between Ursula von der Leyen and the, the Pfizer CEO. Let me get his name, uh, right here because I have his name. I wrote his name down. I don't know where I put it. Charles, Charles, if I am not mistaken. Uh, anyway, I'll get his name later. So, so, and that's what they found. They found like at every turn, every turn, they were stonewalled. Why? It's because they wanted to get to the bottom of it and to understand what really happened. So why the EU, the European Union watchdog, was prohibited from digging deeper into the investigation? You know, if they found themselves— if they found their investigation is thwarted at every turn, As they delve closer, it's because what's at the heart of the investigation, of course, the allegation of bribery. And remember, I'm using the term allegation of bribery, you know, till I have evidence in front of my eye, I, I will not say bribe for sure. Al— for now, I will use the term allegation, but you will see towards the end, you might— you— because for me, I'm getting closer to removing that word. Out of the, the, the, the, the verbiage, that is, which means it gives me a high probability that it's no longer an allegation. So, which is, by the way, a grave, grave offense and an affront. It's an affront to the principles that the EU and its member nations hold dear to their hearts. Because you all remember, anytime Europeans scream bloody loud, they'll say about the human rights, the rule of law, respect of law, when they couldn't do it themselves. So, so the next question becomes for us is, which is a common question, was money exchanged in this case? Did Pfizer in its quest to secure lucrative vaccine deal, stoop to engage in bribes? And the fundamental question of them all: did Ursula von der Leyen, a beacon of so-called political leadership— which I don't believe in that anyway— accept these alleged underhanded dealings? So, and that's why sort of, uh, it behooves us to bring this to the fore because Western media went silent on this. It's no different than what we had in the United States. I wrote articles about it back in 2014, I believe, '15 or something. If you check me out on the Huffington Post, I used to write for the Huffington Post Uh, I, you know, it's there. Someone, if I, if I find it, I'll pull it up for you guys. Uh, and I argued why the investigation was swept under the rug. Did Congress have to do anything with it? Well, obviously it did, because members of Congress themselves were lobbying for Saudi Arabia. You know, I don't shy away from saying it because it's the truth. So this is no different here. So those are tough questions that we need to ask, and questions that demand answers, because in my opinion, the kind of— this kind of questions shake the foundation of the faith in this institution. I don't have faith in this institution, the like of the EU, the like of the ICC. Even the UN itself. I, I don't have faith in those because I've, I've been, I've been around long enough to see how they operate, how they say one thing and do another. We are witnessing this right now in what's going on with Ukraine. Like, Scott and I yesterday were talking about the idea of, you know, if Ukraine was thinking it's gonna get in NATO, that just That just, you know, the comedian President Zelensky is, uh, he's out of his league. That, that's one thing I can say. You know, the guy can differentiate, uh, or know the difference between international affairs and international relations, or global affairs and geopolitics. I mean, you ask him, just define geopolitics for me, and he'll be like, what are you saying? You know, and again, I'm not putting the guy down. No, no, I don't do that kind of nonsense because it's nonsense. But I don't hold back from calling a spade a spade, you know. You, you, you call him out on it because he was— you would think he would learn from history, like what happened in Georgia with another idiot like Mikhail Saakashvili, the former president. It was the same scenario. So it's same thing for here, the EU that's screaming bloody loud about, you know, human rights and the rule of law. And when it comes to bribe at the heart of its core, of its values, let alone by the higher-ups. So if the higher-ups do it, what do you think the lower people in the bottom might do? Even though you can find honest people at the bottom of the hierarchy, this is what's troubling. But remember, as I said at the beginning, No matter what, no matter how vital these questions are, because they have been met first of all with the wall of silence. That's what prompted me to do this. And again, because of your comments also, guys, most of you suggested that. Remember when we talked last time and I said if you want me to do it, I don't like just to go and do— I like to do something you guys have an interest in because your time means a lot to me. This is why I lash out at those individuals putting the stupid comments when I did the India video, because it's wasting your time for you to be reading that's trivial and nonsense, because it's nonsense. And I would never ever waste your time no matter what. So the inquiry by the EU watchdog has been stonewalled because How else will we explain this? I can use the term stonewalled, I can use the term obstructed, and I can use the term hindered. Well, if those three are aligned, what does it tell you? Something is been cooking, because that's the only way. But again, let me be clear, let me be clear, guys. The objective here is not, is not, and I repeat, is not to pass premature judgments or engage in speculations. I'm laying out just the facts, and we're gonna get, you know, let the facts lead you where they may. Simple as it is. It is crucial, I believe it is crucial for the sake of, uh, transparency. And I may even use the term justice. Justice matters. Truth matters. So, and, and why the transparency and justice? Because such investigations carry out thoroughly, they have to be without obstruction without hindrance, openly and fairly. Let everybody see the facts where they are, you know. So we must know the truth, because again, truth matters. And that truth itself must be made public. This is why I'm, I'm questioning why the investigation was swept under the rug. On whose authority? Well, she is the commissioner, so it's because— here's the thing, guys, in everything you do in life, and I'm talking general term, in every— everything you do in life, first of all, do it with 100% conviction. If you are convinced about it, don't do it if you are 50/50. You're either in or out. Okay, that's one. And second, transparency is not an option. It's not optional. I'm gonna say to myself, oh, let me think, do I want to be transparent today, but tomorrow I choose not to be transparent? No, no, it doesn't work that way. That's what I call integrity. That's where it comes in. That's very, very impor— important because it's a fundamental It is a fundamental requirement for any so-called democratic system. If we are to say our system, our democracy is the great or, or the greatest, then let transparency be. What happened to the 9/11 investigation? Why was it swept under the rug? For the families of the 3,000 people that died to have justice for their loved one that were lost in vain. Let alone at that time, and this is not classified, that the government, our, our beloved government, was aware of the chatters about it 2 months before, one in July, one in August. So, but again, you have to understand how the political system operates in Washington. I'm seeing the replica of it in Europe. This is exactly what it is. So, because those are serious allegations, you know, at the helm of the European Union, and in my opinion, uh, they ought to be addressed properly and promptly and according to the law and regulations. Just because you are the European Commissioner doesn't give you the right. You are not an emperor or an empress to just do whatever you want. What happened to the common man? What happened to the average person? He or she might not have a voice. Should we just disregard them? No, they are citizens. They have the right. If we are to say we live in a really true democracy, which such thing doesn't exist, by the way, it's an illusion. If Aristotle warned about it 2,000 years ago, we're seeing it. So then you got a bigger problem to hold this. How would you maintain public trust? How will European trust the EU commissioner that involved in a bribe allegations? So, and why will the European Union watchdog be, uh, hindered in its investigation and be blocked? What am I talking about here? It's being blocked about having access to text messages that were exchanged between— and I'm going to show you here— between these two, one to one. What's concerning about this— and again, me talking, me looking in, not judging, looking in— if you are the commissioner, if you are the CEO, why are you engaging in text messages that way rather than going through your subordinate? You have aides. Both of them will have an aide that handle that kind of stuff, you know. And hypothetically, we go with the argument that, oh, they want to have a direct communication, which is great. I'm, I'm not against it, you know. Why now Ursula von der Leyen's office is blocking access to the text messages? Why it's not allowing the EU, European Union watchdog, to take a look at what in those text messages? Like I said, transparency. If you got nothing to hide, why would you worry? Yeah, because some might make that argument, oh, it's my privacy and all that. Absolutely correct, but we're talking about an investigation here. That's what makes it different. Uh, so that becomes very, very problematic because now the whole— and then here's the sad part. You take something like this, bribery allegations for the European Commissioner, then you take her statements about what happened in Ukraine by when she said— and I believe, and I could If I recall, if my memory serves me well, she said that Ukraine is winning, which is a flat-out lie. So if you take just these two emanating from her, would you even have a trust in what she says? Or the whole European, uh, uh, uh, the, the European Union for that matter, leave alone some other leaders. I'll, I'll, I'll put out Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, somebody at least who's taking stand. The rest of them are too weak. They are too weak to take stand. And here's the interesting thing, guys, leadership matters when it's tested. If I am to just put a suit and tie and go to the office and everything looks great when everything is fine and I call myself a leader, No, no, because it's when I'm tested that people is going to find out, do I deserve that title? Because calling somebody a leader is not a right, it's privilege, and you have to earn it. That's like respect, you know. The reason I respect you guys is because you show me respect. Because you have earned it and I have earned it towards you. That's why I will not stand for this nonsense comments that it's an insult not only to me but to all our community. And I will challenge whomever was spewing those nonsense or those lies, whatever you want to call them. As a matter of fact, it's not even worth talking about. And maybe that's what I need to do. I know some of you guys wrote and said, Dr. O, just, just move on, leave that Yeah, it's hard for me. It's because I'm straightforward. I don't hold back if I need to speak the truth. So yeah, sometimes I let it go, but again, because I care about our community and I will defend it and protect it by any means, to the best of my abilities, of course. So, so now becomes the idea of whether or not money was exchanged Whether Pfizer engaged in bribes, whether Ursula von der Leyen was on the take, these are really serious questions that require urgent answers. And for the sake of the EU's integrity, and like I said earlier, for the sake of justice itself, this must— the truth must come out one way or another. So, but there is one thing I need you to know. And by the way, I'm gonna share links with you that you guys can take a look at it later. One of them has to do with this, uh, with the investigation itself, because you need to, you need to see. Copy. And I'm going to share it with you here, guys, and you can, you can read it later if you like. This is about an article that came out pertaining to this. And so, and I'm also going to share with you because I digged into this and I went as back, uh, as far back as 2011, to be exact 2012. And what I found was very disturbing. I was aware of some because Pfizer was involved in 6 scandals at that time, or 6 bribe cases. Let me share the link with you guys. Okay, let me see this one here. Yeah, 6 Scandals. And this article, as a matter of fact, this recent article that It's only go back to 2021, but I do have another one that goes back to— and by the way, the CEO's name is Albert Bourla, B-O-U-R-L-A, that's his name. So, so let me go back to the article that I found, which was back in, uh, uh, uh, 2006— I'm sorry, 2012. And I'm going to share with you an image. Here is this image right here, guys. And by the way, this is why— this is why it's gonna— what prompted me to be thinking about the health aspects, because you need to know certain things. This is what pharmaceutical wants you to be on. This is basically shortening your life. Two things will help you: stay away from a doctor and do not take medication. So, but I'll, I'll be addressing that in, uh, and, and, and I, I promised you I will do a health channel about sharing health tips with you. It's going to be just for that. There is no geopolitics, there is no global affairs, It's health tips. And the reason is I have acquired information, I have acquired knowledge over the years, but I also have access. I have access to people who know a great deal for over 40 years in this field. So to me was, what is my role in this, in this world if I couldn't share the knowledge with you? So just to help you. And again, take it or leave it, it's your decision, not mine. But at least for me, I'll say to myself, I've contributed something to humanity. I don't care where you are joining me from, in a sense of, you know, you're all the same to me. You don't favor one over another. You don't do this or that. You know, that to me, that we all, we're all the same. We're all the same, guys. This is where I see why some people are so, so, uh, short, uh, like close-minded. Just because something was said they didn't like, instead of having an open mind and listen carefully first before jumping to conclusions, issuing statements that have nothing to do with reality and spewing lies. So, so that's the reason why I want to do the healthcare— the health channel with you. So here's the link, guys. And this one here, by the way, just to let you know Because I had to confirm this stuff here, even though it's an article and all that, but it's still— so the reason why is because back in 2012, an employee of Pfizer— as a matter of fact, not just one, those employees, and they were located in Italy, not even here in the US Italy provided the free call phones, photo— photocopier, printers, and televisions to doctors. That's what they did. That's what they disclose is that Pfizer embarked on arranging for vacations for doctors to push the medication. They also arranged for weekends in Rome and even made a direct cash payment under the guise of lectures fees. Because you know, lectures— I'll give you a quick, uh, which a lot of people do not know. For us here in the US, when somebody like a high-ranking officer or official inside the government, once they're done with the government, they go on speaking engagements, right? How much do you think they charge? I'll give you a quick example. Clinton When he went to Australia and gave a talk in Australia, how much did he charge for that? Just one-hour talk. It was, I believe, over $100,000. So what people do not know is that when those individuals are giving those lectures, they are lobbyists. They've already been hired by the entity that invited them to give the talk. So where is the integrity? Where is the honesty? Because what you're going to be saying as a lecturer, you're going to be saying what the entity wants you to say, not what you believe is true and accurate. That's why, if you recall yesterday in my conversation with Scott, before we even start, I said he is the big deal, he is the deal, because I trust his judgment. This is what I call a true patriot. But you can see, somebody like him, instead of being advising, the government can reach out to him to learn from. They marginalize him and the likes of him. I can think of Dr. Ken Hammond, a scholar who knows great deal about China. You will think our great government will be reaching out to him for advice. That's what I meant by this, guys. So, and here is what's in return for those weekend trips in Rome and, and the vacations in, uh, in Gallipoli. In return for that, you know, it's a promise from doctors to recommend and prescribe Pfizer's product. So this is what I found, this article in 2012, and I'm going to share it with you. As a matter of fact, the, the, uh, at that time when an investigation inside the US was conducted, Pfizer had to pay $60.2 million in penalties to settle the documented charges of bribery. By the way, $60 million is a drop in a bucket. This is exactly what's at the heart of this investigation in Europe, because the EU gave billions of dollars to Pfizer in return for 1 billion dosage of the, the, the vaccination and all that, the dosage, whatever that was. I hope you didn't take it. Yeah, stay away from that stuff. Take my word for it, and I'm talking based on experience, and I'm talking based on facts. You all hear about— I don't know if your country, whatever part of the world you're in, uh, when the winter gets closer, I the end of the fall, why you need to take flu shots and all that stuff. Don't if you only know what's the ingredient in that stuff. So be aware, be aware. That's all I can tell you here. So yeah, let me, let me get you the link, guys. You can read this stuff later on. So because I want to, uh, I want to get in into something very specific about Ursula von der Leyen that you need to know. Copy link, and I'm gonna share it with you. Now let's talk about really what Ursula von der Leyen is thinking, which, by the way, I don't believe she's qualified for the position. Same with the Chancellor of Germany, same with the Foreign Minister of Germany, because she's a German. Ursula von der Leyen is a German. She was a former defense minister, so with no military background, with no— you know, I don't know how they get to these positions, but again, it's not my business. The Europeans have to live with that. Germans have to live with that. Here's the thing, NATO summit. Now, you always As I always say, you have to think of the big picture. NATO Summit, the Secretary of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg. Did you guys know that his term extended 3, uh, expired 3 years ago and he had to be renewed? Okay, or, or, or, or extended, not renewed, extended. And now he trying to extend it even further. And who wants to take his spot? There are two individuals in Europe. Can anybody tell me if you happen to be familiar with it or aware? If you do, please type it in, in the chat box. Two individuals, and I did mention this before in some other videos, uh, you know, I'm sure you remember. Let me just take a look here. And to me, these two individuals are far, far less qualified than anyone else. They just can't be— they can't be serving in this kind of positions, let alone NATO as a whole. It needs to be disbanded. NATO is a security threat, or is a threat to global security for that matter. Look at just what they're doing in Asia now. As a matter of fact, I intend to— when I invite Scott back, I intend to address something he's very familiar with. I don't want to spell it for you guys because I want to keep it as a surprise, uh, about a topic that he knows a great deal about, and I intend to have that discussion with him, conversation with him. Oh, I think— whoa, David Oualaalou, I think the woman Van der Leyen considers herself as an American. Her husband and all his 7 or 5 children are working and living in the US. Yeah, I won't be surprised, you know. But the thing is, you know, if you are as an American, why are you representing the interest of the Europeans? Which tells you right there, Europe can— Europe can be independent, you know. So let me see if you guys put it down, uh, the other channel. Can anybody type in for Brandon Burke, the other channel, the Geopolitical Trend? No, he's asking for the Geopolitics in Conflict. So If anybody can type in that for him, please, that would be great. So, so the two individuals that they want to replace Jens Stoltenberg is the clown BoJo. Believe it or not, he is behind closed doors pushing to become the next secretary of NATO. Okay. And the second person is Ursula von der Leyen. Now, why Ursula von der Leyen is of interest to this? And here is the thing, you guys need to understand the big picture. What just happened last week in the Netherlands, in the Dutch, the government collapsed and the Prime Minister Mark Rutte resigned. Do you think he resigned because the government collapsed? No, he resigned because he is aiming at the position of Ursula von der Leyen, which is the European Commissioner. Because the expectation is that Ursula von der Leyen will replace Jens Stoltenberg. Because remember the setting that has always been set by the United States after World War II: Europe will be under our own thumb. That's why you're still seeing the many soldiers in Germany, and now we are promping up the Poles, the Polish military. We're doing the same what we've done before. So, and what happened with the institutions in NATO, like for example, NATO will always have a European secretary, Secretary General will always be from Europe, but the head of the military will always be a 4-star US general. They will never be a European 3 or 4-star general. That will never happen, at least so far that I've noticed, and I don't see any change to that trend. It will always be US. Why? Because we control the budget. We control the decision. The Ukraine conflict, we the one dictating it. And now, as Scott said yesterday, and rightly so, He nailed it when President Biden tried to lay out some way out, because if we all of a sudden said, okay, we need to stop this conflict, that's defeat for the West, for the US, for NATO, because NATO understands it can't match Russia. That's a fact, despite what you hear, despite what you read. Lead. So, so for NATO, it will always be a European Secretary General, but the military commander will always be European. It's no different than the IMF and the World Bank, okay? The, the World Bank will always be a European. The IMF will always be an American. And those, those positions are by design. To control and maintain our dominance over Europe. This is why somebody like Orbán is perceived as anti-democratic, and it's nonsense. The guy— not the guy, the prime minister— looks out for the interest of his people, which what you usually supposed to expect from a leader. You look after the interest of your people. That's what comes first. This is why the investigation was swept under the rug, because if it comes out that she did indeed take bribe, let alone she had to go jail, which I don't see how that's going to happen, they're going to work around it. It's the idea that if she— if it comes out and she wants to run for becoming the NATO Secretary General, that's bad. It's already bad to begin with because all Europe is talking about is bravado, no more no less. There is no integrity anymore. So that's what I see. And again, I can't reach a conclusive, uh, uh, uh, conclusion here for you guys because I just present you the facts, the info. You're smart enough to connected the dots, at least for me, knowing what I know about pharmaceutical. And, and by the way, I will be detailing with you once I launch that channel, the health channel, as far as health tips and all that. I will be detailing with you about how the pharmaceutical industry works because I do have access to people who are inside. So, and again, for the sake of knowledge, no more, no less, because I feel that's my responsibility. So, all right, let me see if you— by the way, guys, be on a lookout for a video that I'm going to be releasing about India. Yes, I will release a recorded video about India. I don't care whether some likes it or not, is irrelevant to me. It's what's factual. And again, I present the facts. So be on a lookout for that. Uh, I'm gonna release it soon. Uh, uh, it's different from what I did on a live stream, but it's worth your time. It's, it's only 12 minutes or 13, whatever that was. Very, very, very short, very short, to the point. But it has some stuff in it I didn't disclose in the live stream. Not that I forgot, I just had to do it that way. Then be on a lookout for another video coming about China. Very interesting, uh, uh, dynamic. So just be on the lookout for that, and, uh, and we just go from there. I'm open to always your suggestions as far as topics. And, uh, if you want me to do the recent meeting of the SCO and how India refused to sign the, uh, the, uh, what was it, the 2030 I think the 2030, uh, yeah, the 2030 Development— yeah, that's what, that's what it was. Yeah, Economic Development Strategy for 2030. So India refused to sign it. So I'll be happy to dig deeper into this. I might as well just do a live stream on it if you guys want it. Let me know. Just leave me a comment and I'll be happy to do it. All right, let me see, uh, if there's any question or two, and I'm going to sign off because I have to go do some work. Uh, first of all, let me— where are you joining me from again? It's this— yeah. All right, Brandon, did you get the answer? I'm assuming that's what you're asking for, the geopolitics in conflict show. That's what it is. Uh, all right, let me— oh, Abel, good to see you, Abel! Good to see you, man. I haven't seen you for a while, so hope all is well. Good to see you. And yeah, that's the, uh, yeah, everybody answered that one. Thank you so much, guys. So, so let me see a question here. Oh, let me take this one here from, uh, Hong Wong. Question: Wonder if the BRICS meeting will decide India affair within the BRICS group. Now, I did see a comment, and I believe the person was from India. He's saying there is, uh, uh, the BRICS and SCO can do squat about India being removed. I don't think so. There is protocol in place. Of course, what we need to understand is that, uh, you're not going to just say to India, hey, we don't want you to attend next meeting. Because it doesn't work that way. There's a protocol for today, and I don't claim to know what the protocol is. I'm going to look into it because it will have to have a mechanism by which, uh, because becoming evident now, if India is objecting to the BRICS currency, what does it tell you? If, uh, if, uh, uh, the US is about to establish a naval hub in India, what will be the objective for it if India is rejecting the, uh, the strategy, the development strategy for 2030 from the SCO, what's the objective of it? So it's almost India becoming like the— I won't even use the term the wild card, but is, is, is it behaving on behalf of the West? Because that's, that's what it's becoming clearer now, more and more. So I'm sure those countries will have to figure out a mechanism by which If a country does not meet certain criteria, you know, what is the purpose for it to be there? That's like you in a team. Let's say you are in a cricket team or soccer team or basketball team, whatever, or a military for that matter, and you got a, a member of the team or two that they are just dead weight. They just dragging the team down. They just never up to their tasks. What you gonna do? Are you gonna be, uh, uh, uh, babysitting them? Are you gonna be always taking care of them? Or you're gonna say, hey, get it together or get out. Simple as that. That's what I will do if I'm in charge of that. And I said, hey, you have two options here: get your act together or get out. Simple as that. So I believe BRICS and SCO will have to face that reality. So, because where things are headed, and I'm again, I think far ahead, what I'm thinking about, I'm thinking about when NATO start to really cement its presence in Asia. This is why China issued a warning to NATO, and I'm thinking of doing a video for you guys because you need to know the implication of that warning. That's the way I see it. I'll give them the option. You either work with us or just get out. We'll replace you with another team player. Simple as that. So, so that's what I see, probably what they're gonna do. Uh, uh, you're saying, please do, David, please do talk about India rejecting BRICS currency. Yeah, it's worth talking. Uh, I'll share it with you guys. I'm not gonna— because you're a part of the community, so I will be having a call with some very important individual without detailing here, and this individual has to— on the global market deals with gold. So this is one of the things he needs to really have a grasp, and that's why I reached out. He understands by the way how I, how I present my analysis about what I see this. So, so I will be happy to do that, uh, Athena. Because it's, it's worth talking about and we need to know. Uh, it's the truth, is the reality. So if any— if somebody gets upset or didn't like what I talk about, I'm sorry. And I don't, I don't, I don't talk or write or address something to meet the sensibilities of people. I'm beyond that nonsense, and you guys all know that by now. So, all right, let me see one more question if there is one, and I'm gonna sign off, guys. All right. Oh, Lover of the Russian, thank you so much for your super sticker. Truly appreciate it. Uh, brilliant show with Scott Ritter. It was indeed. I will have him back on this channel also and the other one. Scott and I, we talk offline. So, you know, in the military intelligence, it was a small community. We know each other. So I know somebody put a comment, it's like, Doctor, I didn't know you were in the military. How do we know? I usually don't talk much about my thing. So, but I always— this is why, guys, I put the brief bio in the description just for those who might be the first time. So they know at least what are they getting in this channel. Because I really don't want people to waste their time. If this channel is not for them, don't, don't waste your time, man. Don't waste your time. Because I don't talk about silly stuff. And if you are here to learn and, and educate yourself— and you know, I had it yesterday with my own son, that he's only 16 years old and start asking questions that matter. And you know, one of the question he asked me Why are we only having two parties in America? I mean, for 16-year-old to be asking that question, and I usually don't talk much politics to him. I always tell him, I'll answer you if you have questions, but I'm not going to just— because he has to learn to have a curiosity, to have critical thinking, and that has to come from within. So I was very, very surprised by his question, and I told him, sure. We'll sit down and talk. So, so yeah, I'm gonna have, uh, Skyraider again. And thank you so much for your Super Sticker. So, uh, all right, I'm going up. Jack, good to see you. Jack Robert, as always. Uh, and I'm seeing some names here that would— SK Wong, good to have— good to see you again. Alfredo, good to see you again. Ronnie, good to see you. K, good to see you. Yeah, it's always pleasure to be with you guys, and I mean it. You know, I don't sugarcoat things, and I mean it. If I didn't mean it, I wouldn't even be here. So anyway, guys, I wish you a pleasant weekend. Make sure to take some rest for yourself. Just chill out, do nothing. That, that time is also important. And I look forward to seeing you next time. As always, remember, geopolitics impacts your daily life in more ways than one. Till next time, guys, bye-bye.