Dennis PragerFounder, PragerU · Founder of PragerU | NYT best-selling author

Media Deems Coverage of Voter Fraud Unworthy

19 Nov 2020 · 1 min

Watch on YouTube

1:12

In this segment of his YouTube commentary, Dennis Prager questions why mainstream media gives extensive coverage to allegations such as Brett Kavanaugh’s high‑school conduct and the Trump‑Russia collusion, while treating claims of voter fraud in Michigan as unworthy of attention. He states he is agnostic about whether the alleged fraud would alter election outcomes, but argues that testimonies from dozens of individuals alleging corruption merit investigation. Prager frames his perspective with his long‑standing motto of "first tell the truth and give your opinion," emphasizing a call for balanced media scrutiny of all serious allegations.

Chapters

Whether or not they would lead to a reverse decision, which I don't claim they would, I don't know. I'm agnostic because I told you, but my motto for 35 years, first tell the truth and give your opinion. So I don't know, but I do know that it is worthy of investigation if 250 or 200, whatever, 40 people swear at the risk of perjury that they have seen corruption in the voting process just in Michigan, and it's just in one area of Michigan. Is that unworthy of coverage? But it was worthy of coverage what Brett Kavanaugh allegedly did in high school or at Yale? That was worthy of saturated coverage? The, the alleged collusion of the Trump campaign in 2016 with Russia, that was worth it? That was worth all the coverage?