Clinical vs. Portable Shockwave: Maximizing Treatment Depth & ROI for Chiropractors

21 Nov 2025 · 2 min
2:15

A recorded discussion (YouTube) about choosing between clinical and portable shockwave therapy devices for chiropractic practice. Speakers compare the flagship clinical unit (Mark 3) and a portable unit (Mark V), explaining tradeoffs: clinical units offer greater longevity and easier part replacement while portable units serve traveling clinicians. They describe three target uses—surface-level trigger-point/pain relief (gentler/faster settings), deeper regenerative stimulation (slower, deeper settings), and noted penetration depths: their devices reach up to 8 cm while competitors range from 4–12 cm. Practical workflow recommendations (when to use each unit in-clinic) are included.

Questions this video answers

Mark 3 (clinical flagship) and Mark V (portable model).

Up to 8 cm (they state some competitors go up to 12 cm or stop at 4 cm).

Uploaded/created by Jeff Langmaid on November 21, 2025.

Chapters

More from Jeff

0:38
youtube.com

Why I'm personally betting on THIS

1d ago
6:45
youtube.com

STOP Referring Airway Cases to the Wrong Doctor First

1d ago
0:24
youtube.com

Nobody Tells This Story...

1d ago
0:45
youtube.com

Their Expectations Are Your Job...

2d ago
0:39
youtube.com

Can A Fused Level Still Cause Pain?

3d ago
17:03
youtube.com

A Fused Spine Segment Can Still Cause Pain | #559

4d ago
0:54
youtube.com

STOP Marketing Yourself As An Airway Chiropractor

4d ago
0:51
youtube.com

A Guideline Can Sit For 10 Years

5d ago
1:11
youtube.com

Struggling to Close? Record the Conversation.

6d ago
0:37
youtube.com

Chiropractors Are Built for This Coming Shift

1w ago
7:29
youtube.com

Video Wins Everywhere. Here's Why.

1w ago
See all content