Jeff Langmaid identifies why clinician meetings fall apart: people skip updates, lack consistent processes, and swing between rambling and overconfidence. He proposes three pillars—case notes, research, and meetings—to build a repeatable approach that works across different personality types.
This is most of the time I see this happening when you go out and have conversations. So you talk about case notes, research, and meetings as the three pillars. But meetings are where things get real weird. Like, you know, people can just not send case notes. Or maybe they 99.9% don't send updates, so they don't stay consistent. But meetings are where everything gets real weird because people go in. It's like, you know, I can't wait to tell this other person everything they never wanted to know about. Chiropractic that work, it's like, you know, you know, or you go in and you're like, you know, I, I, I'm introverted by nature, so it's not like my comfort zone. And then like, for me, it would be like not having a system in process. I'm like, meandering. But then I see other docs that are then like, overly, you know, falsely confident. So when I looked at that, I said, okay, well, through trial and heartache, you know, how do you make this something that whether you're super introverted or you're super extroverted, it can work?
