Jeff Langmaid has spent a decade pointing out that science and clinical guidelines support his chiropractic approaches as first-line treatments, yet practitioners still don't follow them. He's frustrated by the gap between what the evidence says and what actually happens in clinics.
I feel like I am constantly saying the same old thing for 10 years. The research shows what we do is, is best. All of the clinical guidelines from pretty much every single guideline provider in history recommends what we do should be first or at the top of the list. But I think there's sort of an interesting disparity between, you know, I'm sitting here like the, there's such overwhelming evidence and such overwhelming guideline support for what we do. Where's the breakdown between that and actually what happens in real life?
