Banning AI Could Leave Students Less Prepared for Work

In this video, Kevin Surace argues that professors who ban AI tools in coursework are making a critical error. He advises educators to assume students will use AI for all aspects of their assignments and to shift teaching focus toward critical thinking and other higher‑order skills that complement AI usage. Surace draws a parallel to the historical shift when calculators and Excel rendered manual long‑division instruction obsolete, noting that modern workplaces no longer require such skills. He illustrates the hiring impact with a hypothetical comparison: a graduate who refuses to use AI versus one who openly leverages tools like ChatGPT to research, edit, and produce work. According to Surace, the AI‑savvy graduate is far more attractive to employers, reinforcing his claim that proficiency with emerging technology is a decisive factor in employability.










