Kevin Surace describes why QA professionals resent AI: it generates 4,000 to 5,000 automated tests in an hour and finds 255 bugs, while a human writes one Selenium test in the same time. Their anger isn't about AI failing, but about it threatening their relevance.
Most people don't hate AI because it's useless. They hate it because of this. I've had, you know, QA people at prospects say, well, this can't do this and this can't do that. I said, so we'll run it and we run it and in an hour we stop it and it only generated 4,000 tests in an hour right now. In an hour, maybe they would have written one in Selenium on average, one every 1 to 2 hours. Okay, this thing wrote 5,000. Well, they can't be any good. Actually, they're all excellent and they all run. Well, they didn't find any bugs. Actually, we found 255 bugs and you should have found these. Why didn't you find them? You know, And now they're just jealous and they're mad. This can't be, this isn't right.
