Why asking a system provider if an integration is in place already isn't a great idea

19 Feb 2025 · 1 min
1:08

A short video by Kristoffer Fürst arguing that asking a system/provider if an integration is "available out of the box" is a flawed question. He gives three reasons: the question is too broad (many possible integrations per provider), some integrations (e.g., to data warehouses like Snowflake) cannot guarantee the specific data/timings needed, and the question ignores unknown future integration needs.

Chapters

More from Kristoffer

youtube.com

Any SaaS "shall" have costs that can be understood and controlled - but it's not the case

1y ago
youtube.com

"investment managers just want to shop"

1y ago
youtube.com

Portfolio management system (PMS), execution management system (EMS) & order management system (OMS)

1y ago
youtube.com

We have 80 software vendors. I want fewer because ... [3 reasons in the video]

1y ago
youtube.com

How a live-extract Generation-3 Investment book of record works

1y ago
youtube.com

Order Management Software (Trade-OMS) for investment managers [features & selection advice]

1y ago
youtube.com

Portfolio Management Software (PMS) for asset managers & asset owners [features & selection advice]

1y ago
youtube.com

Why investment managers use the full Limina platform and not modules

1y ago
youtube.com

Investment operations transitioning from a "doing"-function to an "instruct and oversee"-function

1y ago
youtube.com

Guide to Investment Management Software: capabilities and how to select the right system

1y ago
youtube.com

Fund Management Software: Guide to selection, evaluation, capabilities & users

1y ago
See all content