Mark Hamilton argues that society will excel if all forms of "initiatory force" are removed. He contrasts "rule of Man"—where factions impose policies by power—with "rule of law," which he labels "Prime law," presenting the latter as the preferable alternative.
Society can not only survive and exist, but it will excel when you remove all forms of initiatory force, which probably a better way to understand is the rule of Man. We're going to do this policy because I like it. My political group, my faction, likes this policy, and that's why we're doing it. Whereas the other, say, political party says, no, that's the wrong policy. We shouldn't be doing that. We should be doing this instead, and we're going to shove it down your throat. Basically, these are forms of initiatory force. And the way we can, in our own minds, understand it better is by saying, huh, that's rule of Man. That's rule of man. Now, what's not Rule of Man? Believe it or not, it's rule of law. And what's the law? Prime law, baby.
