0:58

In this segment of a bystander‑intervention training, the presenter stresses the critical need to label sexual violence explicitly rather than using euphemisms. Using a party scenario with characters Jesse and Erin, the speaker asks the audience to estimate, on a 0‑100 scale, the likelihood that Jesse will attempt a non‑consensual sexual act after feeding drinks all night. Participants vocalize high probability estimates (70‑99%), illustrating how naming the risk as a potential "sexual assault" triggers attention and responsibility. The speaker underscores that precise language prompts listeners to act, while vague terms like "taking advantage" or "drunk hookup" often lead to inaction.

Chapters

More from Mike

0:24
youtube.com

Who Really Pushes Back Against Your Boundaries

2w ago
0:46
youtube.com

Why Speaking Up Isn't Being Difficult

2w ago
39:53
youtube.com

Cornell University Civil Lawsuit

2w ago
0:45
youtube.com

What You Say About Your Partner When They're Not Around Matters

2w ago
1:05
youtube.com

The Cornell Lawsuit Is a Wake-Up Call for Campus Prevention

3w ago
0:38
youtube.com

You Don't Have to Be Rude to Have Boundaries

3w ago
1:04
youtube.com

3 Questions That Deepen Trust and Communication in Relationships

3w ago
0:38
youtube.com

When Someone Won't Respect Your Boundaries, Do This

3w ago
1:11
youtube.com

Parents: Stop Threatening Your Teen's Date (Do This Instead)

3w ago
1:12
youtube.com

How to Say No and Actually Mean It (4 Steps)

4w ago
1:07
youtube.com

3 Steps to Respond When Someone Says No

4w ago
See all content