0:31

In this brief spoken segment, the speaker challenges a minimal, legally‑focused definition of sexual consent—"as long as I can't be charged with sexual assault, I'm good to go"—by illustrating how such a low bar would cause anyone to flee the situation. The speaker then proposes a higher standard: consent must be mutually wanted, meaning neither party is pressured or talked into the encounter, and it must be specific, so agreement to one act (e.g., a kiss) does not grant permission for any other act. The segment serves as a concise argument for redefining consent beyond mere avoidance of criminal liability toward a model grounded in mutual desire and clear, bounded agreement.

Chapters

More from Mike

0:24
youtube.com

Who Really Pushes Back Against Your Boundaries

2w ago
0:46
youtube.com

Why Speaking Up Isn't Being Difficult

2w ago
39:53
youtube.com

Cornell University Civil Lawsuit

2w ago
0:45
youtube.com

What You Say About Your Partner When They're Not Around Matters

2w ago
1:05
youtube.com

The Cornell Lawsuit Is a Wake-Up Call for Campus Prevention

3w ago
0:38
youtube.com

You Don't Have to Be Rude to Have Boundaries

3w ago
1:04
youtube.com

3 Questions That Deepen Trust and Communication in Relationships

3w ago
0:38
youtube.com

When Someone Won't Respect Your Boundaries, Do This

3w ago
1:11
youtube.com

Parents: Stop Threatening Your Teen's Date (Do This Instead)

3w ago
1:12
youtube.com

How to Say No and Actually Mean It (4 Steps)

4w ago
1:07
youtube.com

3 Steps to Respond When Someone Says No

4w ago
See all content