Kosta Ouzas argues Bitcoin follows its own four-year cycles with loose correlation to broader markets. He thinks the post-halving price surge came from psychology, not scarcity, and that effect has worn off. Bitcoin may now revert to traditional market cycles, but he wants data to confirm it.
And, and again one more time. Yeah. The ACM has its own behavior. We will look at how strongly correlates with Bitcoin is. It's not, it's not one to one. You know, it was clear that Bitcoin follows its own four year cycles and he had some level of correlation with other cycles. But it's possible that that drive is over. I don't think it was ever associated with a scarcity of coins due to the Alving. It was more like some kind of a psychological effect associated with Alvin, but then it's kind of dissipated. And so it's possible that Bitcoin is going to follow more traditional cycles. We need the data.
