Kosta Ouzas argues Bitcoin is decentralized money that governments can't control or stop, only ignore. He contrasts it with cashless systems that concentrate power, calling Bitcoin the alternative when governments won't let people freely hold their own money.
You've got everyone. We're going cashless. And then you've got this decentralized thing in a world that is trying to.
Become more centralized.
So how does. How does this work? Is this the good versus evil? Like, how is it going to. Yeah, man. That's like a really interesting way to put it. It's. It kind of is because. Or it's more like it's the people's money. Yeah, right. Everything else is the government's money, right?
Yeah.
This is the people's money because it was invented. But the government are not going to allow the people to have money, are they? So. Yeah, but this is the beauty about Bitcoin.
See, no one can control it.
It's beyond the point of.
Being able to control it.
It can't be stopped.
It can only really be ignored.
But it can't be stopped. Like, because bitcoin.
Will run on one person's computer.
You know, at the end of the day, if everyone stopped using it, one.
Person could just run it.
So the more people that join the network miners.
It becomes harder.
The less people, it.
Becomes easier.
