Kosta Ouzas explains that Bitcoin, while often criticized as lacking fundamentals, follows a power-law trajectory typical of complex natural systems. He illustrates the concept with examples such as the frequency distribution of earthquakes and the distribution of city sizes, arguing that when plotted on log–log axes these follow straight lines, highlighting Bitcoin's place on a similar curve.
Regardless, to getting with what we do specifically and the problem we solve, just Bitcoin as an asset is interesting to talk about. So a lot of the arguments against Bitcoin is that it lacks fundamentals, right? Now, you can argue about that till the, till the cows come home. But the reality is, is that it's following what's called a power law trajectory, right? Now, a power law trajectory is something that we find in complex systems in nature. I'll give you an example, right? You got a lot of earthquakes in the world. You got a lot of tiny, tiny, tiny little earthquakes. And then you got like a few massive earthquakes, right? If you put them on a log, log chart. So a logarithmic of the y axis and a logarithmic of the x axis, right? You can plot a straight line through them. This is also similar in the distributions of cities.
