Two speakers argue against publishing AI-generated content under your name. AI lacks genuine voice and produces shallow prose readers dismiss as garbage. Use it for brainstorming, but only publish work you'd be proud to sign.
I think the worst use case of AI is when you let it speak instead of you speaking, you let it speak. Yeah. Because AI doesn't have a voice, right? It's, uh, it's very shallow and, uh, yes.
Yeah. It's, well, it's not just to let it speak, but, you know, people can say, oh, you know, read my book and write 50 blog posts, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. And guess what? As soon as somebody reads those, they're gonna go, That was written by AI. That's garbage, right? You know, now you might say to it, give me an idea for 30 different articles that would resonate with these people going through these situations. Give me a way to tell a story, right? But don't, don't do the AI slop thing. I think, you know, it's the equivalent of spam today. It's, it just shows a total lack of respect. If you're putting your name on something, you should be proud of it. And I think you gotta ask yourself, yeah, that was really easy. Am I proud to put my name on that? You know, and if you're not, don't do that.
