The Net Zero Plan Nobody Is Talking About | What Consultants Won’t Tell You

Will Richardson explains why most corporate net-zero plans fail: fragmented data, no actionable roadmap, and misaligned tracking. His firm's integrated model delivers 40% faster carbon measurement, up to 42% resource savings, and a typical 14% emissions cut in year one by embedding a dedicated manager and automating data collection.
Chapters
The net zero plan most consultants won't tell you about. Before we start, 80% of listed companies have a net zero commitment. Only 11% have achieved any measurable carbon reduction. That gap isn't a strategy. That gap is execution. This is what most consultants won't tell you. Creating a net zero plan is straightforward. They'll give you targets, timelines, and nice PowerPoint tech. But implementing that plan, that's where the real work happens. And that's where most organisations get stuck. Today, I want to talk to you about why that happens and more importantly, what you can do about it. Section 1: Why plans fail in delivery. Let me set the scene. It's 2023. You've just published an ambitious net-zero commitment. Your board is happy. Your investors are impressed. The communications team has already sent out the press release. You feel good about it. Then you call your sustainability team into a room and ask them the real question: How are we going to deliver this? And that's when the problem starts. 3 things typically go wrong. Number 1, you can't see the data you actually need. Your carbon footprint lives in a spreadsheet. Someone's been updating it manually for 3 years. It connects to your finance system by email. Your supply chain data is scattered across 5 different vendor databases. Your energy bills are in a folder. Your travel data is in another system entirely. This isn't incompetence. This is what happens in every large organisation. Data is everywhere. Pulling it together is slow, expensive, and error-prone. By the time your team has assembled the numbers, another quarter has gone past and the data is already out of date. So you can't see clearly what you're reducing. You're flying blind. Number 2, you have a roadmap, not a working plan. Your net zero strategy says renewable energy, energy efficiency, supplier engagement, Scope 3 reduction. All sensible, all necessary, but the plan doesn't tell you which initiative actually matters most for your business. It doesn't model what happens if you choose energy efficiency now versus waiting for the grid decarbonization. It doesn't show you the cost-benefit of each choice. It doesn't tell you who owns each piece, what the timeline is, and what success looks like. So your team executes in silos. Finance owns the efficiency programme, supply chain owns supplier engagement, and nobody knows if the combined effect of all these moves is actually going to hit the target. Number 3: you're not tracking progress the same way you track the plan. Your net zero roadmap shows 50% reduction by 2030, but the way you measure that reduction is different from the way you set the target. You're using different software, different baselines. Different scope boundaries. So when your team reports progress, it doesn't line up with the plan. The board doesn't understand the variance. Momentum drops. Credibility drops. I've seen this pattern in organisations from food and beverage to media and advertising, from mid-market retailers to FTSE 100 companies. The problem is consistent, and it always comes down to the same thing. Traditional net zero consulting creates a plan and then leaves you alone to implement it. Why implementation actually needs to be different. Here's what we've learned at 51 to Carbon Zero, working with organizations across 40+ markets. Net zero delivery isn't primarily a strategy challenge. It's an execution challenge. And execution requires 3 things to work simultaneously. First, you need data that's live, integrated, and actually trustworthy. Not data from the last quarter, not data that's been manually verified, live data from your actual systems. Finance, procurement, travel, utilities, all flowing into one place and updated automatically, all calculated with the same methodology. This sounds blindingly obvious, but most organisations don't have this. Their carbon accounting lives separate from their operations, so it doesn't drive real-time decisions. Second, you need your reduction strategy connected to actual operational choices. Not just reduce by 50%, but specific. This initiative saves us 40 tonnes of CO2 per year and costs £200,000. This one saves 60 tonnes and costs £500,000. This one requires a capital investment of £2 million and takes 3 years to deliver. With that level of detail, you can prioritise, you can model scenarios, you can say, if we do energy efficiency first and wait on supply chain, we hit 35% reduction by 2025. If we tackle supply chain first, we hit 28%. but unlock a £1 million contract with our biggest clients. Those are the conversations that actually drive implementation. Third, you need someone in the room who understands both the data and the business. Not a consultant who visits quarterly, not a software vendor who doesn't know your sector. A dedicated person who's a part of your team, who knows your supply chain, who understands your business model, and who has access to live data to guide the work. This person helps you move from, we want to reduce carbon, to, here's Exactly how we're going to do it and when. How the integrated model works. So how do you actually build this? Most organisations try to cobble it together. A sustainability consultant for the strategy, a software vendor for the data, maybe a separate supplier engagement programme, all disconnected. What we've built at 51 to Carbon Zero is different. We've integrated the 3 things you actually need into one working system. Let me break down how this works in practice. First, real-time carbon measurements. Every month, instead of building a spreadsheet, your data flows automatically into our platform. We've built 3,000+ pre-built connectors that plug into your finance systems, your procurement systems, your travel management, your utilities. Became a bit Scottish then, didn't I? AI pulls the raw data, categorizes it, and maps it to the right emission calculations. What's the result? Organizations using our approach measure their carbon footprint 40% faster than traditional methods. Data collection time drops by half, and because it's all automated, you're not manually checking spreadsheets every month. You're comparing real numbers against real plans. But measurement alone isn't enough. You need that data to drive decisions. So second, transition planning built into the data. Once you have clear measurements, you can build scenarios. Our platform lets you model. If we move to renewable energy, Scope 3, Scope 2 drops by X. If we improve logistics efficiency, Scope 3 transport falls by Y. If we engage our top 100 suppliers in decarbonization, Scope 3 emissions fall by Z. If we do all 3 together, we hit our target by 2030 instead of 2032. This isn't theoretical. It's built on your actual data, your actual supply base, and your actual energy consumption. So when you present this to your board, you're not showing them a consultant's PowerPoint. You're showing them your own numbers modeled against your own business. And crucially, the reduction initiatives stay connected to the measurement system. When you cut energy consumption, carbon measurement updates automatically. You can see in real time whether you're on track. Third, expert implementation. Support built in. The thing that separates a plan from a delivery program is someone driving it. At 51 to Carbon Zero, every client has a named Climate Success Manager from day one. These aren't part-time advisors. They're certified climate professionals who understand your sector, who sit across your business, and who have direct access, access to your live platform data. They help you prioritize initiatives. They guide supplier engagement. They support your team through the complexity of Scope 3 measurement, which is typically where organizations get stuck. They're part of your team, not outside consultants sent in for a scoped project. And the model is different from traditional consulting. There's no hourly billing, no re-procurement when you need support. No, that's outside the scope. Your Climate Success Manager's role evolves with your program. If you need deeper work on supplier decarbonization, they're already integrated. If you need to shift your plan to be based on business changes, they help you do that. So what this actually delivers. Let me give you the numbers on what this integrated approach looks like in practice. 40% faster measurements. Your team measures carbon footprint in weeks, not months. Up to 42% resource savings versus traditional approaches. You're saving time on data collection, manual verification, and reconciliation. Your sustainability team does more with less. 100% audit pass rate because your data is structured, auditable, and connected to your actual operations. When external auditors review your carbon figures, they pass first time, every time. Measurable progress. Real-world example: one of our clients cut emissions by 14% in the first year, not because they did something extraordinary, but because for the first time they could see exactly where their carbon was, model what mattered most, and track whether their actions were actually working. And this is possible across any sector. Organisations we work with range from mid-market retailers to Footsie companies, from food and beverage businesses to media and advertising groups. The pattern is the same. Why most consultants won't tell you this. So you might ask, if this integrated model works so well, why isn't every consultancy doing it? There's an uncomfortable answer. Traditional consulting makes money from repeated engagements, scoped projects, hourly billing. If you deliver a piece of strategy and then a separate vendor delivers the software and another team handles supply chain, the traditional consultant. Stays relevant. They can re-pitch for the next phase, the next crisis, the next update. Our model is different. When you integrate expert advisory with live data and continuous support, your success becomes our success. We make money when you hit your targets, not from billable hours. We make money from the long-term relationship, not from the next crisis engagement. That's a fundamentally different business model, and it's not compatible with the way most consultancies are structured. What this looks like For your business. Let me get specific. If you're building a net-zero program right now, here's what changes with an integrated model. If you're in food and beverage, your Scope 3 supply chain is massive and fragmented. We help you move from, we have no idea what our supplier emissions are, to, we've got clear visibility on our top 500 suppliers. We've modeled the impact of targeted engagement, and our procurement team now has a prioritized list of interventions. That typically unlocks 20 to 30% of your reduction potential in Scope 3. If you're in media and advertising, campaign emissions and production footprint are typically invisible. You're reporting Scope 1 and Scope 2, but you're missing the thing that actually matters in your sector. What's the carbon footprint of the campaigns you produce? We bring that into view. You can then market sustainable campaign production as a competitive advantage. Some clients have unlocked 6-figure contracts by being transparent about Campaign Carbon. If you're a mid-market or a FTSE listed, your reporting requirements are increasingly complex. SECR, CSRD, SBTi, CDP, all demanding slightly different data. Traditional consultancies will deliver separate reports for each. We integrate it into one platform, one data layer. All disclosures feed from the same source, so when you update your baseline, every disclosure updates automatically. The net zero plan most consultants won't tell you about isn't complicated. It's just honest. Delivery requires integration. Data, strategy, and ongoing expert support need to work together from day one, not in silos. If you're frustrated with the gap between your net zero ambition and your actual carbon progress, that's not a failure of strategy. That's a failure of execution. And execution is solvable. We've proven it with organizations across sectors and geographies. If you want to explore what an integrated approach would look like for your organisation, I'd welcome a conversation. We can walk through your current data landscape, model some scenarios, and show you where the biggest reduction opportunities are. No pitch, no pressure, just clarity on what's actually possible. Get in touch with us at 51 to Carbon Zero or reach out directly.










