A youth soccer player gets more college recruiting attention in a stronger league, even on a weaker team, than dominating a weaker league. MLS NEXT appears in college coach emails 15 times more often than other club levels, making league tier the bigger factor than individual team strength.
Is it better to be on a good team in a bad league, or is it better to be on a bad team in a good league? Now I want you to change the word good and bad to exposure. Which one is gonna give you the most exposure? If you're on EDP or E64 and you're the number one team in the state or in the country, that's called big fish small pond. Maybe that's a really good place for you because college coaches will know you're one of the better teams despite playing against not as good players because you're gonna get noticed. Likewise, if you're playing MLS NEXT and you're the worst in MLS NEXT, maybe you're not gonna get noticed because you're the worst MLS team. I will tell you the short answer though is you should always play in the better league and be on a worse team. The word MLS NEXT gets responded to 15 times more in the subject line than any other club level. So if you had to pick to be on the bad team in a better club level unless you confirm you can get exposure elsewhere. And it also depends on your college coach and the club and other factors. So if you want more help so I can determine that with you, give me a call. Links in the bio.
