Two people clash over money after a split. One says they pay half the rent; the other says that's not enough and questions spending on Botox and BBL. Karamo points out that tit-for-tat arguments won't work without clear boundaries on child support versus household costs.
I'm paying half of your rent. Nobody even supposed to do that. I'm sustaining a household.
So you're not supposed to provide for the household your children live for when you don't pay child support?
I'm doing more than providing. How do you talk more when you don't even pay your child support?
But why do I need to struggle for you to help?
You're not struggling. You went and got Botox last week and you're talking about going to get a BBL. You're not struggling. Hold on. You're not struggling. So let's see what we have right here.
The tit for tat is not gonna help y'all. Everything is convoluted with y'all because it's not about the kids, it's about y'all's relationship. When you called and you pick up that phone, you said come and you agreed to paying rent. That's you paying rent for your girl, okay? Because if you wanted to do with your children, you would have said, hey, here's the money for child support, you do what you want. Whether that's an apartment, whether it's whatever, you do what you want. Now that's about kids. When you say, hey, I'm gonna pay your rent, that's not closure. That's leaving the door open for something else.