How to get what you want every time

Over my career, acquiring and scaling businesses for acquisition.com I've done a lot of deals. I want to put the five most brutally effective tactics that I know in one video for you. A lot of these things I didn't actually learn from books. I learned them from mentors and actually seeing them do it and learning like in the streets, in the real world, most itty bitty tactics like don't actually drive the needle. But these five actually have gotten deals done and improve my situation or standing in the deal. So let's dive in. There's three contexts that you're going to use each of these skills with. The first is with employees. And this goes both ways. If you're an employee trying to negotiate with an employer, then that applies. The second is going to be vendors. Now this also applies if you're a vendor who's dealing with customers. And then third, you've got what I would consider partners. This is when you do deals, M and A, things like that, investment. So these are kind of the three big vectors that all of this stuff applies to. So if you're like, I'm not sure if this will work for me, you for sure. Even if you don't have a business, you are an employee. And if you are an employee and you don't want to use that, you certainly have vendors that come to your house and do things for you like, this is the fruit of life. You have to negotiate and you get what you negotiate, not what you deserve. That may sound not fair, but it's also the truth. Number one, this is actually from a Harvard Business School thing that I learned from Sharon Sravatta. It's called batna. Now I didn't know the fancy term for it, but it means best alternative to a negotiated agreement. So what does this really mean? Research has shown that having strong batna, basically a strong alternative to gives you significant leverage in negotiations. Negotiations all about leverage. London Business School did a study and they found that negotiators who know their alternatives set higher aspirations. So they ask for more, they make more aggressive first offers, and they negotiate ultimately better outcomes. So your batna serves as almost like an anchor, a counter anchor that you have in the back of your mind of what you're negotiating with. It's kind of like a source of power. It's a decision standard that you only accept deals that are better than your best alternative. You can think about this in any setting. So if you're with a girl and you know that you can only date tens, if a 7 comes along, you're like, well, my alternative is a 10. So I'm only dealing with tens. If someone says, hey, I'll be willing to buy all of your inventory for 10 bucks a piece, and somebody else comes along and says, I'll do it for nine, instead of just saying no, you're like, I'll do it for 10, 50, or I'll do it for 11. You can edge them up, but if you know that it's not going to matter, then it doesn't matter. So I'll tell you something that recently happened. I'm right now negotiating to buy a home. It's something that Layla wants, and it's aggressive. We already have a home that we like a lot. I really like the house we have. My best alternative to buying this house is doing nothing and just enjoying the home that I already have. They're in a terrible position because right now I know that they haven't had anyone else who's bid on the property because it's aggressively priced that way, it's them versus me, and it's who wants it less. The reason bad is so important. Okay, I get that. How do I have a best alternative to negotiate agreement? You. You win negotiations. And I'm starting with this one because I think it's all five of this or six ones that I'm going to show you are going to be so important. But this one is probably the greatest source of psychological power. And you do this before you sit down to the table. Me going to look at these homes. I know I don't have to buy the homes. When I was selling Gym Launch and Prestige Labs, I was like, I can just keep the businesses, and they'll just keep making me money. I don't need to sell them. And from negotiating for that position, you only want to sell when you don't want to sell. You want to buy when you don't want to buy because you have something else. If you're looking for jobs as an employee, you want to negotiate when you already have another offer. So if you're going to your existing employer, get another offer and then negotiate with that, you can only do that so many times before you start losing goodwill. So you have to make sure that you're balancing that well. If you're dealing with a vendor, then you're like, okay, I'm going to get multiple bids before I'm going to decide to work with you, because these are what I'm considering. You'll get so educated from actually negotiating 4, 5, 6 of these vendor agreements that then you'll learn other terms that other people include that you can use, which is a later strategy that I'll explain. Getting multiple offers before you sit down increases your bet. So for sure, don't take the first offer, because even if you have first offer within the negotiation with one guy, but then you have that offer compared to all the other offers, you're ultimately going to get to do the work on the vendor side. It's reversed. What's my best alternative? What are my other customers? If I've got 20 other customers, I got people banging on the door. It's a supply demand thing. So I've got more demand for my services than I have supply. And so if you don't want it, don't worry, I've got another customer behind you. And so this is the leverage that we go back and forth in negotiations. And then finally with partnerships, the same idea. How can I get multiple offers from people wanting to buy my business? And at the same degree, for me, if I'm trying to buy a business, then I want to not have to buy the business because I got other businesses I'm looking at. So no matter what, all of this is won before you sit down at the table right now. If you sit down and you need this deal and you have no other offers, you all the little tactics that you can try, sure, you can try to do it, but the thing is that it's just trying to win at poker only on bluffing. It's a bad position to be in. I would rather have pocket aces if you have other offers. There's two different ways of thinking about this. So one is you can be overt about it and say, listen, this is the counteroffer. If you could beat the offer, beat it. If you can't, no worries. We don't need to waste time. The other way is that you just have it in the back of your mind and then you just see what you get. Because the thing is, somebody else is giving you a $10 offer. If you say, hey, I've got a $10 offer, maybe this person will just beat it by 10, 25. But if you have the confidence that you know you're going to sell the inventory no matter what for a profit, shoot for 11, shoot for 12, shoot for 15. Like, you can shoot way higher because you know your plan B is not bad. And so when you show it, they're just going to basically marginally edge it versus you having the confidence to basically swing big real quick. If you were a business owner and you are not growing as fast as you'd like, I'd like to give you a free gift. So my team and I put together the $100 million scaling roadmap, which is basically 200 hours of US looking over all the portfolio companies we've had and what stages of growth they went through and more importantly, where they got stuck and how they got past it. And so we broke it in these 10 stages and we made this little kind of quiz thing where if you put in your business information, it'll tell you where you're at and the most important part for you, what to do for each of the functions of the business across product, marketing, sales, customer success, recruiting, it, human resources, and finance. And so no matter what you're struggling with, someone else has already struggled with it and solved it. And so I'd like to give you this thing absolutely free. You can go to acquisition.com roadmap, plug in your business information, and if you want us to actually help you decontrain the business and you're trying to scale, we'd love to help you out on the thank you page. You can just book a call with my team and we will look at the business, see if we can help. And if we can, we'll invite you out to Vegas and we'll do this in person, live. So if that's cool, hit the link. Otherwise, enjoy the rest of it. Now, the second is a big one. And a lot of negotiation books and courses and stuff talk about this and people are like, hey, I'm not trying to anchor here. It doesn't matter if you say, I'm not trying to anchor here. It's an anchor. An anchor is the first number that is set in a negotiation. If you're like, hey, what do you think you'd be willing to do this for? And someone's like, I was thinking I could maybe do it for $2,000. That's now the anchor. You want to get less than that. And you were like, shoot, I was hoping for 500. Well, something you should have said 500 first, because now their 2000s seem ridiculous. There is a strategy called counter anchoring, but. But it's typically not as effective as anchoring, but it's the only move you have left. Now, the flip side is the reason a lot of people don't want to put the anchor out is because they don't want a short change. If someone was going to say yes to 5,000, you put 2,000 out there. You're like, damn. Because whatever happens is if someone gives you a fast yes. You're like, no, I left so much money on the table. So I'll give you a little pro tip that I've learned being on the other side of this. If I have somebody who comes to me and says, hey, I'll do it for $2,000, and I would have paid 5, and I say, yeah, $2,000 works. The next thing I do is I say, hey, and if you were curious of whether I would do it for 2,500, I wouldn't have done it. And the thing is that it puts them at ease that, like, you know what? You wouldn't have done more. And what happened is I bought a super expensive penthouse a few years ago. And after I bought it, the guy who sold it to me, obviously a wealthy guy too, he said, hey, we accepted your first offer, and you're probably wondering if we would have done it for less. He said, I wouldn't have sold it for a penny less. It felt so classy. Maybe he would have sold it for penny less. I have no idea. But in the moment, actually, like, I was like, okay, it just made me feel a lot better. So if you're in the reverse situation, I would put someone at ease by just saying, hey, I wouldn't have done it for any less. I wouldn't have done it for anymore. Whatever. What's interesting is that Daniel, Nobel Prize winner, figured out that people give excessive weight to the initial information and make insufficient adjustments from that starting point. It's a psychological bias, basically. It's like you want to anchor as high as possible. And that's why I'm a big advocate of getting the gas. You put the big number out there because it completely shifts the whole negotiation numbers to way, way higher. And the things people think in different increments, and that's what we want to change. If you say, I'll do this work for $100,000, whatever, you're in construction. If someone was thinking 10, their increments now become the entirety of what they were willing to pay. They're going to be like, can you do it for 80? All of a sudden we're thinking in $20,000 increments. As a side note, you can also anchor increments. So explain what that means. I'll actually walk you through the house negotiation that I'm actively in right now. The house was listed at 25 million. Then they dropped it to 20 million because the markets changed things like that. Okay, so now they're at 20 million. So I made an offer for 15 million. They countered, and said, we'll do it for 16,9. So big move on their part, right? They're moving aggressively. They're trying to sell the house. They moved a lot towards me because they're trying to get a deal done. The natural thing that some people might think is, okay, they're at 17, you're at 15. Counter with 16 here. So what I did is I counted with a 15.25. So they moved 3 million. I moved up 250 grand. Thing is that there's this idea of, like, movement, of you make an offer, I make an offer. So if I say 15.25, what am I indicating? I'm not willing to move very much. I'm going to out of reciprocity, which we'll cover later. I'm willing to move a little bit. I'm going to make some counteroffer, but I'm not going to give a lot. Then I can stack in other terms that make it more ameliorable for them. My initial offer, I had two other things. I was like, okay, I can offer cash. My first offer is not going to be cash. I can also say, hey, it has furnishings in the house, which are super expensive. I don't want to have to deal with refurnishing the house. What I did was when I moved up to 15.25, I sweetened the deal by making it all cash. But then I also said, I also want the $4 million of furniture that's in the house, which is technically a worse second offer than my first offer. But the thing is that I moved the number up. And a lot of people are always way too fixated on the price and not enough on the terms. One is, we anchor with our original price and also in the increments that we move in. This was something that took me actually a while to figure out. And so let me tell you a story about this one. So one of my partners at my gym, way back in the day, I learned this from him. We had to get this big custom front desk built. So it had, like, multiple cutouts. We have multiple salespeople. Big, impressive, custom built. The guy came out, they built this whole thing. He was like, hey, when we went to do, like, the final inspection, we noticed that they had kind of nicked a corner of it just from moving it around or whatever happened, right? It was a small nick, but it was noticeable. My partner goes to the guy and he says, hey, how much would it cost you to replace this? And the guy, of course, because he doesn't want to rebuild the whole Thing. He's, oh my God. It would be a huge deal for us to have to like just this little thing. We have to go back to this job, we have to do those stuff. It would probably cost us $1,500 just to replace that. And he says, that sounds like a pretty good place to start it for a discount. Nasty. I was like, oh, I'm going to use that. If there's ever someone who messes something up, instead of saying, hey, what can you knock off the price? Ask them what the big inconvenience would be for them, ascribe a price to it, and then they have a hard time backing down from that because they just said that's how much it would cost them to fix it. Then you should probably discount us by that much because that was the size of the mess up. So you get them bidding for themselves and then you flip it. So number three, I learned this from a different mentor. They call it mesos, but basically multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. So what does that mean? That means that I present offer A, offer B and offer C, or just offer A and B. Doesn't really matter. You can have two offers, you can have three offers, and each of these have different prices and terms associated with them. And so what happens is when you make multiple equivalent offers, it's like embedding, reciprocity. It's like, hey, I'm trying to be reasonable. I just want to figure out what works best for you. Because all three of these work for me, but which one's better? This is a way of actually teasing out what someone else's priorities are if they're not willing to tell you. Because a lot of times you, you want to hold your card close and not say, what are the things that are most valuable to you? Now, over time, you build some trust, you build some rapport, and you will be able to share because ideally, something that's important to you is not important to them. And they give you this one and something is born to them that's important to you, you give to them. And that's fundamentally a good negotiation. And one of the big things that I misunderstood in the beginning is that I assumed negotiation was a zero sum game. And it's never a zero sum game because you're a different person, you have different needs. You're always going to have some things that will be more important to you than other people. And in that situation, it's like you want to just interlock the things that matter most to each person. That's where it becomes a Positive sum game. Both parties are better off from basically giving and taking in places that are less meaningful to them and more meaningful to the other person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology showed that presenting multiple equivalent offers simultaneously increases the likelihood of finding mutually beneficial solutions. This approach demonstrates flexibility while also maintaining your core interest because you're the one who's presenting all the offers. It's almost like a reverse assumed close. Hey, I'll do any of these three things, and you just pick the one that works for you. And then the thing is, they're picking all. Any of these I said already worked for me. Let me give you like a real word example. So let's say option A is lower monthly fee with a longer commitment. Option B is a higher monthly fee but has premium support. And then option C is kind of like a pay as you go with slightly higher rates but maximum flexibility. Right? So all three options will give you similar overall value. But you might look at them and be like, I just want to know which one meets your needs better. From their answers, you'll be able to understand their motivations. Now, let me tell you some knowledge from the street. If someone gives you multiple offers, if you're on the other side of the table, what I like to do is say, I like the best part of this one, and I like the best part of this one, and I like the best part of this one. And why don't we make an offer that is the best of all three? And I learned this from my friend Charon. Guy's done more deals than anyone I know. I was like, ooh, that's good. So the flip side is you could ask someone, hey, can you give me two or three versions what this deal might look like? And then they come up with their versions of the deals. And then you say, great, I like this piece. How about we do option D? And what's nice about this is it also shows some active listing for you. You countering with something like this or even taking two of the three components, Two of those components might be meaningful for you and not for them. Again, because they put them in the different deals, you might find out that you can get more of the things that you want just by asking. So number four, reciprocity. Now, reciprocity is key in all sorts of persuasion. And I'll say this one cave that I believe reciprocity only matters in cultures where reciprocity matters. There are cultures where reciprocity is not nearly as important. This is where sometimes when cultures mix, people take advantage of systems because that's not as important in the culture they came from. And so the culture where the person is giving first in order because they expect something back, the other culture will just take advantage and be like, look at this idiot, he just gave me some free stuff. And so you have to make sure that basically you're within a culture or society that that reciprocity is the norm. But if it is the norm, there's huge amounts of things that you can use from a persuasion perspective. So the beauty with how we structure reciprocity is that people are more sensitive to the fact that they gave something and you give something. What's more difficult is ascribing the relative value. So let me give you an extreme example. Let's say that I take someone's order from the counter and I bring it to the table where we're both eating lunch, right? The person might say, thank you for doing that. If I then said, hey, can you pick me up and drop me off from the airport tomorrow? I mean, I did get you your lunch yesterday. The thing is that it poses, it looks like it smells like reciprocity, but the value of those two concessions are wildly different. And so the idea is that we're trying to trade concessions in a way that is still advantageous to us. What I like to do in terms of my thinking, like the example that I gave in terms of multiple simultaneous offers, which is why I think this works well post that is that I try and break each of my things into as many different pieces as possible so. So I can trade more times. So like this house example that I gave you earlier, if I have 15 million, but this thing is going to be financed. Can I go cash or financed? I could do closing period. I could say it's a 90 day closer, 30 day close, that's going to be significantly more valuable. I could say furniture versus not. There's other terms that we can basically weave into the deal that I'm not going to play all those cards at once. Now this one is a real estate. Taxis is much more straightforward. But a transaction like this, it's like you want to think what are all the variables? We want to use all the value equation variables, speed. How can I deliver this faster? How can I do it slower? We've got the actual price, obviously on top of that we have the risk associated. So who's going to be taking on more risk in this situation and what are the different types of risk that someone's taking on? Then we have ease. How can we make this easier or harder for the other person. For each of these components, you want to take whatever you're offering, whether it's an employee or. Or whether it's a vendor or whether it's a deal. I want to look through each of these lenses and think, how can I have more variables at my disposal so that when it comes to the horse trading, I can make a small concession in ease? And they only have two variables, and I've got five. And when I have five, I can give without changing my price and say, hey, I'll do 15 with ease. They'll come down from 17 to 16. And I say, cool, I'll do 15 with ease and risk. And then they come down from 16 to 15.5, and I say, cool, I'll do 15 with ease, risk, and speed. And so when we do it like that, then all of a sudden it's like, I'm still keeping the reciprocity, but I just have more arrows in my quiver. When you're sitting down at the table, you want to think through all of these different variables that you have at your disposal. For me, I have this big deal sheet that has 80 different things that I can change about a deal so that when I go into the conversation, I have so many things that I can move flexibly to make my offers more compelling without the unstated assumptions that people all have because things they're assuming, the deal just says these two things, then everything else is the way they want. And for you, you have 80 other variables that you're like, oh, I can change this one, I can change this one, I can change this one. And that allows you to stay in reciprocity with the other person that ultimately gets you a better deal long term. So as we're thinking through this, it's if we sit down at the table and we have one or multiple other offers that we think are really compelling and interesting, and we use that as our psychological power. So we can anchor super high, and we anchor low in terms of our counters. Right. Anchor high in terms of our initial, anchor low in terms of our counteroffers. And then we have multiple simultaneous offers that are either presented to us or that we can present to somebody else using more variables. And then horse trade with reciprocity so we can stay in the pocket, but still more or less stay at the same initial offer, then we're probably going to increase the likelihood that we get a good deal done. Number five is framing. I would say this is most important, especially for employees and vendors, less so for partnership type or like M and A type stuff. But it can probably also be important here too. But I'll just give more use cases in these two right now. So if we're talking about framing, then how we position something is going to matter a lot. So if I'm an employee selling to an employer, which is fundamentally what you're doing, I would probably say something to the extent of we want to make investments in these places. And I see me coming in as an investment, not a cost. And ideally, if we frame this as how am I going to get a return on this investment, then I'm no longer a cost center in the business at all because I'm just a percentage commission essentially on what I'm bringing in the business. If I'm a vendor to the same degree, I'm going to try and frame something as an investment. I'm going to frame it based on return, not based on overhead. On the flip side, you always want to reframe the other way, which is you want to reframe this as cost. You want to reframe this as overhead so that ultimately you have more basically negotiating power because you're pushing them down. They're aching themselves up. A lot of times people don't even understand framing, and so they'll just accept the frame that you present. So rather than saying, hey, this is going to cost you five grand, we just say, like, for $5,000 investment, you can see $15,000 in maintenance cost savings. That's very different than this is going to cost five grand. If that's the reality, then it's going to be far more compelling and far more likely the person's going to accept your offer, even though functionally it's the exact same thing. I was talking to a few home services businesses that do kind of construction stuff. And so I talked to a pool guy, talked to a patio guy talking about, talked to an awnings guy who did like awnings on top of patios. And I said, do you have any data that shows resale value of homes that have awnings versus not? Or do you have any data on resale value of the specific neighborhoods that you're going to go into of pool versus not pool? If someone knows they spent $100,000 on a pool and adds $100,000 to their house, I'm like, then the pool's free, except you get to enjoy the pool the whole time. So this. We shouldn't even be talking about that. Cause you're really just taking it from one pocket and putting it to another. You're the one who gets to keep the pool. I don't keep the pool. It's all for you. So the idea here is how we frame it. If you're going into these things to cost you 100 grand, that's a very different frame than your house is currently worth a million. The other houses that are selling at 1.2 all pools, it's gonna cost you 100 grand for the pool, but you're gonna add $200,000 in home value. What are we talking about? It's a very different conversation. So tactically, when you're in one of these situations, we want to have the data to support our argument for whatever our framing is. And typically it's going to be some sort of return, especially if it's a monetary thing. Right. We want to frame it in terms of what the is. And so the strongest position to say, look at the other 10 houses that sold in this neighborhood. Look at however many deals that have been done. They all had these components. The ones that didn't suffered this sort of loss. And you know what, maybe it's not a one to one ratio. It costs you 100 grand. And the houses with pools, it's an extra $50,000. Okay, let's not frame it as 100. We can frame it as half off, but you also get to enjoy the pool for that whole time. And so if you think you're going to sell this in how many years do you want to enjoy it and barely pay much at all over that period of time? Probably. Rock and roll. If you like this video, you're going to love the 13 years of brutal business lessons that I have learned over my career. Enjoy.