Speaker (Nate Tilley) rejects equating wealth with money and defines "wealth" as being a eudaimonic polymath — well-rounded across multiple life areas. True wealth is balanced abundance across domains (health, relationships, business, energy); money alone is insufficient if other areas suffer. The chunk includes a personal anecdote (strained family relationships, poor health) to illustrate the claim.
I don't associate the word wealth with money. I define wealth as being a eudaimonic polymath, someone that is well rounded in all different areas of their life. I wouldn't deem myself as being successful if I had billions of dollars in the bank, but my daughters thought I was a lousy father. I was really out of shape either. I had a horrible relationship with my wife. I look at wealth as having multiple areas of your life that are balanced, that have abundance because there's a relationship between them all. Either I'm in better shape. My business does well, relationships are better. I've got more energy to show up.
