In this video, the speaker raises concerns about the UK’s handling of COVID-19 and flu in 2023, questioning whether new lockdowns are imminent. The central argument is that an independent, evidence‑based review of the 2020‑2021 lockdowns is essential to determine whether they were a net benefit or net harm to public health, the economy, and societal well‑being. The speaker critiques the government’s lack of accountability, highlighting the UK’s £2.3 trillion debt, under‑funded NHS, low nurse pay, and the apparent double standard that allows the public sector to operate insolvently without oversight. Current data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) showing high levels of COVID and flu cases are cited, alongside guidance from the Health Secretary and Chief Medical Officer (Prof. Susan Hopkins) that advises staying home when ill and wearing face coverings. The speaker challenges the effectiveness of face‑coverings, the transparency of PPE contracts, and the broader political culture exemplified by Partygate, arguing that without independent reviews, poor decisions remain unexamined. The video concludes with a call to action for viewers to share the message and demand independent scrutiny of major public‑health and fiscal decisions.
Chapters
New COVID measures, lockdowns coming in 2023? That is the question. I'm going to talk quickly about some new measures in place for, um, COVID and flu and, um, some advice that the, the government or the Health Secretary or the Chief Medical Officer are putting out there at the moment. Which I think is important. Going to attempt to be as balanced as possible in this video, but there's one question that's not really being asked which I think is vital to be asked. Why has there not been an independent review of the lockdowns, of whether they were a net benefit or a net negative to society, whether they overall saved lives or whether actually they could have cost more lives or, um, detrimental effect on the economy and well-being. There must be, I believe, an independent review. Now, there— the governments may have made the correct decision, which an independent review would draw out. However, the governments could have been seriously and drastically wrong, in which case they need to be held accountable. So why is there no independent review? And, um, there has been data and research to suggest that, um, there's a possibility that there were more deaths because of lockdowns than lockdowns saved? Now, I don't know the answer, but an independent review should bring this up. And a lot of people are now just cracking on and burying their heads in the sand, and the government are just moving on with new scandals and, and new issues. And a government represent the people, they're put in there by the people, although we don't have a democracy here in the UK anymore. But they should be held accountable for their major decisions. And I'm— I don't know the answer. I've got my own thoughts. I better not say those. I don't want to get cancelled. But there must be an independent review. There must be. Now, Jacqui has said independence doesn't exist. Here's the thing. Do you remember when there was the Partygate and they were having parties and breaking their own lockdown rules? And then apparently there was a review And they were basically given parking ticket fines, and that was pretty much it. That wasn't an independent review. That got brushed under the carpet. And too many things are happening in the world as a convenient way for previous decisions to just be brushed under the carpet and not properly independently reviewed. Otherwise, how are we going to improve in our decision-making and our policies? So I campaign for independent reviews. If you agree with me, please share. All I ask is for independent reviews of really important decisions that affect the nation, like vaccines, like lockdowns. Surely, surely this is just common sense. But no one dares speak up about it because people are scared of being cancelled or deplatformed. But unless we speak up about it, nothing ever changes. Okay, so here's the quick update on kind of what's going on in the world of COVID and flu and the NHS and some messages from the Health Secretary and the Chief Medical Officer. So apparently flu and COVID cases are currently circulating at let me actually quote it, and this is from the UKHSA. COVID and flu cases are currently circulating at high levels and are likely to continue to increase in coming weeks. So that begs the question, are more lockdowns coming? Now, the Health Secretary— get this— the Health Secretary blames COVID and flu for the massive pressure on the NHS. But I say, what about lockdowns? What about the £2.3 trillion of debt that the government are in? What about the huge lack of funding for the NHS? What about the low nurses' pay? Where are the government spending these hundreds of billions that they have in the budget? Are they spending it in the right place? Is there accountability to spending and getting an ROI on the money? The thing is, if you're a a privately owned business in the private sector, you have to invest money wisely to get an ROI, and if you don't, you don't make any profit. And if you trade insolvently, you can either be struck off as a director or worse, you could be put in prison. Whereas the government have been trading insolvently for decades and there's no accountability. And they basically, they're allowed to break their own rules. The insolvency rules for the private sector, for entrepreneurs and startups and small businesses that run the world, that run the economy, that generate 90% or more of the revenue, that pay the public sector. The rules for insolvency do not apply to the public sector, do not apply to the government. How is that right? So the Health Secretary blames COVID and flu for the massive pressure on the NHS and believes the government has the right plan. But there's no independent review of the lockdowns. The lockdowns could have cost our economy trillions. It's probably a big factor in the massive increase in taxation, the huge mental health issues we have going on right now, the high suicide we have going on right now. Yeah, and I'm not going to open up any other scandals that are being mentioned here because again, I said I want to try and keep this balanced. And if independent reviews show with evidence that decisions that were made were right or fair or at least balanced or reasonable, fair enough, I'll be the first to do a live on it. Okay, now, Professor Susan Hopkins, Chief Medical Adviser, has said if your child is unwell and has a fever, they should stay at home from school or nursery until they feel better and the fever has been resolved. Adults should also stay at home when unwell and wear a face covering if they go out. Where's the independent review on whether face coverings actually work? And if there is an independent review and it works, fair enough. Problem is there's scandals within the government about PPE equipment and certain people, um, creating contracts for PPE equipment that had financial interest in the companies that won the contracts. So again, we need the independent balanced reviews and we're not having them. It's like we need a government to govern the government. An independent government to govern the government is fucking crazy, isn't it? The government is supposed to be independent. Wow, so you're being told by the Chief Medical Officer if you're an adult and you're ill to go out and wear a mask. You're also being told only to use accident and emergency if you think you're going to die. 'Oh, I've broken my arms and legs, my face is hanging off, but I probably won't die, better not go to A&E.' For goodness' sake! And why are the A&E and the ambulance service so underfunded? Well, the ambulance services are on strike, so people are going to die from that. And again, £2.3 trillion in debt, billions in interest that could be going into our services. Allow the governments to create their own rules to trade insolvently. So, the Health Secretary blames COVID and flu for the massive pressure on the NHS. Is that a convenient excuse for drastic overspending and poor policy? Is that a convenient excuse for trillions in debt? Well, I think there's more to the massive pressure on the NHS being COVID and flu. I think there's a lot more than that. What about mismanagement of the economy, of budgets, of policy? Anyway, they just seem to get away with it because there's a, you know, the Ukraine war conveniently brushed everything that happened through lockdowns under the carpet. And more and more things that just happen that they can jump onto and focus on, so for no accountability for everything that happened in the past. That's got to change. There needs to be independent reviews. They're my thoughts. Let me know what you think, and please share this if you agree with anything or you think that the discussion needs to be, um, you know, more open, more balanced, more fair, more accountable. Thanks for tuning in, and remember, if you don't risk anything, you risk everything. Let me know what you think in the comments. Michelle said it was done intentionally.
