Russell Brand Loses Sponsors š®

In this monologue, the YouTube host (Rob/Robert) reports that Russell Brand has recently lost his publisher, literary agent, charitable partners and is likely to lose sponsorships following renewed sexualāassault allegations, including a newly reported 2003 incident. The host questions whether the swift corporate disassociation is justified given that Brand has not been tried or proven guilty. He reflects on how rape accusations are often mishandled by police, the changing social climate around consent, and compares Brandās behavior to that of Andrew Tate and Joe Rogan. Throughout, he invites viewers to comment on whether Brand is guilty or being set up by mainstream media, cites personal anecdotes of friends warning him, and emphasizes the need for a fair legal trial rather than a ātrial by social media.ā He proposes interviewing Brand with a lieādetector to provide a balanced discussion, and frames his commentary as a stand for free speech and against cancel culture. The host also links the Brand case to broader narratives of media distraction, elite conspiracies, and past political scandals, urging the audience to stay vigilant and speak out.
Chapters
So a breaking news update on the Russell Brand case is that he has lost his publisher, his literary agent, also a charity he supported have distanced this, pushed him away basically, uh, and I guess he's going to lose now all of his sponsorships and endorsements, whatever he has. And in some ways I think, well, he's not been proven guilty yet, so I guess from the sponsor's point of view You know, they probably don't want any association. I guess there's probably something in the contract, but there has been no trial, there has been no proof, um, and yet they've all withdrawn. Also, um, an alleged, um, attack, rape, I guess, from 2003 has just been reported to the police. That was 20 years ago. Now, I don't know what you think, but a report to the police about, um, you know, predation or rape that happened to you 20 years agoā I don't know. I don't want to be too skeptical here because I don't actually think that, um, enough rape cases are taken seriously. And everyone who's had you know, any issues of predation should be able to go to the police and know that they can, um, you know, put an accusation forward and know that it gets taken seriously, and at the very least that it gets investigated. And, and, you know, as I understand itā I'm not in the policeā but as I understand it, they don't take a lot of these cases very seriously, and, and that obviously is really important. But 20 years agoā now, now look, The world has changed, and I almostā I'm so glad I'm married and I'm not out there dating, because I almost feel like now I need a clipboard with a consent form there. And anytime I go on a date, oh, can you just sign this waiver to say that you consent to having sex with me? And I don't know if you've watched the documentary, by the way. I watched the entire documentary, and does he come across like a predator and a rapist? I don't believe he does. Does he come across like promiscuous and flirty and charming? He could probably talk his way into my pants. He definitely is promiscuous and flirty and charming, and you can see how women would be charmed by him. But I just can'tā he just doesn't come across like, you know, a rapist. Like, for example, if you compare him with Andrew Tate, Andrew Tate is more aggressive a man. And has said more aggressive things compared to what I've seen with Russell Brand. So I'd like to ask you in the comments, let me know, do you think Russell Brand is guilty, or do you think Russell Brand is being set up by mainstream media and whoever's controlling above mainstream media? What do you think? Now, um, what's interesting here is this is not just, you you know, men versus women, because actually two women very close to me believe he's innocent, uh, and they don't really think that, you know, he's like that. And why have these cases come out so, so late? 20 years ago, one of them. So that's very interesting. Um, and, and actually another friend of mine messaged me saying, Rob, be very careful, you know, don't just automatically side with Russell Brand. Well, actually Um, if you watch my first live, I pointed out how it could be a setup, um, from mainstream media. And on my second live, I talked about seeing it more from, you know, the victim's point of view. So hopefully, I like to think that I, I've provided a balanced approach. Now, a couple of people have said, Robert, you know, why are you commenting so much on this? It's because we must stand up and speak out about important issues. Now, when they went for Joe Rogan to cancel him, I spoke up about that, even though I don't know Joe Rogan. I'd love to know Joe Rogan, but I don't. When they went for Andrew Tate, you know, I spoke out about that and again tried to present both sides. And so now they're going for Russell Brand, and I think it's, it's easy for all of us to sit back and go, oh well, I won't comment about that because it's not me. And some people are even saying, well, Rob, you know, you, you interviewed Andrew Tate, you're a misogynist. You're interviewing Russell Brand, you're a misogynist. No, I'm not. I'm just using these stories and examples as a way for us to discuss very pertinent issues. So let me know what you think. Do you think he's being set up, or do you think he's guilty? The breaking news is that his publisher, his literary agent, um, one of his charities, and I guess anyone he's associated with is now going to um, ditch him. Personally, I'd have him on the show. I, I did. Ifā look, I will make this a public announcement. If Russell Brand is innocent, come on my show. I'll get a lie detector, we'll do an interview, I'll ask you a balanced set of questions, and I'll put a lie detector test on. I'll quite happily do that. Um, you know, if, if that would help in any way, as everybody else is running away from him. Um, so there's a few people here in the comments who are saying that they've been a victim before, but they actually think this is BS. Because here's the thing, those of you that are a victim to a sexual predator, I guess you'd be able to compare it. I've never been one, so I couldn't say this is what a sexual predator looks like and this is what Russell Brand looks like. But those of you who haveā thank you for commenting, by the wayā those of you that have experienced both, you would know better than us what one would look like. And many of you are saying that that isn't Russell Brand. Um, so yeah, I think it's a shame. I don't think it's right. Like, I understand why sponsors need to go, well, um, pending the investigation, you know, we're not associating with you. But it's notā nothing's been proven yet. Only just today has a report gone to the police, and that was from freaking 2003, 20 years ago. So I have sympathy for someone who gets dropped by everyone the minute there's a bit of news out there. Because what happens if all this ends up being false, or he ends up being proven innocent? Because this is the thing, you know, Ruby Alice, you know, the guy who went, 'Mwah!' The kiss. Well, um, his life's going to be ruined now. You know, was that inappropriate? Yes, of course it was. Can you grab someone and just kiss them? No. But Was it rape? No, it was a passionate, emotional kiss which probably warranted, you know, a humble apology and explaining that that's not a good role model and he's not normally like that. But he doesn't need to go to prison. He doesn't need, you know, to have this massive lynch against him. But this is what's happening. So, you know, the punishment doesn't befit the crime. And now his reputation is fucked. And it's going to be the same for Russell Brand. His reputation is going to be fucked, even if he ends up being innocent. You know, the girl, one of the first girls, said she was 16. Now, she might have had makeup on and looked 21. 16-year-olds can look 21. He might not have known her age. Um, and yeah, that's not illegal. All right, maybe it's not appropriate, he's 30, but it's not illegal. She hasn't broken the law, and that's all over this documentary. And so now that just makes him look like a predator, even though that it's not proven. Also, by the way, I don't know if you watched the documentary. Let me know in the comments yes or no if you did or didn't. But this one 16-year-old said some fairly damning things which didn't make him look good. If it's true. But then they gotā they interviewed 3 people who used to be a runner for Russell Brand when he was on Big Brother's Big Mouth. And what he used to do is he used to say, oh, um, will you go and get that girl's phone number for me? And will you go and get that girl's phone number for me? And then run, get the phone number. He'd phone them up, they'd have sex, they'd get upset. And then the next day, these people would phone up, um, these runners and say, oh, Russell Brand's not answering my calls or replying to me. Well, that's not rape, and that's not sexual predation. And in fact, the runners are implicit because the runners could have said, wait a minute, my job is to run around for the production company, not run around for dates for you, so no, I won't. They easily could have said no. And now they're coming out saying, oh, well, this was really wrong. He's notā that's not a crime. You know, if we're friends and I like your friend, I might ask you to go and get that person's number. Where's the fucking crime in that? There is no crime in that. And then if I end up sleeping with that person, that's their responsibility and my responsibility. Anyway, let me know what you think in the comments. Ranjit has said, be careful because I'll be next. Yeah, I mean, look, you know, I even said to my MD and my wife, you know, I'm not as big as Russell Brand, I'm not as big as Andrew Tate, but I could easily shut up about these things and say nothing. But I think it's really important to speak out because if, if I don't speak out, none of you will. Um, and if people like me don't speak out, no one speaks out and nothing changes. And people are too easily canceled. People are too easy believing mainstream media, and reputations can be completely ruined even if someone ends up completely innocent. Now, of course, I will do a live and be the first person to say, look, Russell Brand is guilty, he's committed crimes, it's been proven. Absolutely, it's the right thing. Just like I would with Andrew Tate. But until then, they deserve a fair trial, and they do not deserve a trial by social media. They deserve a fair trial by our legal system. And I like to think if people were smearing me, you would say, wait a minute, let's wait until the trial before we judge, jury, and execute Rob Moore. And many of you who are on this live, if you were on the mainstream media news accused of something, I would wait pending the result and the proof. And all these pictures are blacked out of these women who've come forward, and they're actresses. And to me, social media should not be the judge, the jury, and the executioner. And I don't think it's right. So let me know what you think, your thoughts are in the comments. I'm going to keep commenting on this because if I don't Many other people won't. People are always saying to me, oh Rob, you've got to use your platform for good. Well, this is what I'm doing, and I try my best to use the platform for good. And many of you have said this could be a distraction. Yes, I mean, anytime there's something up, it wouldn't surprise me if simultaneously something rather nefarious was going on from the powers that be in the mainstream, and this is a convenient distraction over here. And they're very good at throwing us these distractions. Do you remember when there was the Sue Gray report, the investigation into Partygate in lockdown? Then all of a sudden it just disappeared. What was the outcome of that? Nothing. Oh, just chuck loads more distractions at you. Boris will get away with it. I mean, you could argue that lockdown was crimes against humanity, and all that's happened, um, is that these peopleā no accountability. In fact, they can now go and earn $150,000 or $250,000 a speech. Neil has said here it's a smokescreen from the elite. You know, has Russell Brand beenā why didn't this happen 3 years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, or in 2003 when this allegedly happened? Oh, coincidentally, Russell Brand talks about Big Pharma. He names some very powerful people. Um, he talks about lockdown and COVID. Oh, oh, and we're supposed to believe that this is not some kind of, um, coincidence? Seems very strange to me. Anyway, let me know what you think in the comments. I'll keep reporting on it. I think it's important that we speak up, um, and I stand for free speech. So if Russell Brand is not proven guilty, I stand by Russell Brand. At least in the sense that he's not a sexual predator or a rapist if he is not found guilty. Because if you do not stand by people who are canceled when they end up being innocent, then it basically means we're all guilty until proven innocent. You do not want to give away the power whereby if the media decides you are guilty until proven innocent Andrew Tate is guilty until proven innocent. Russell Brand is guilty until proven innocent. You might not agree with them, you might not like their style, you might dislike them as a human, you might think they're a misogynist. You know what, Andrew Tate, Russell Brand, mate, they could be a misogynist, but currently they should be innocent because last time I checked, our society works on a judicial policy of innocent until proven guilty. And if some smear campaign happened to me, I'd like to think that you would support me as innocent till proven guilty, and I would do it to you. And that's why I supported Joe Rogan, innocent until proven guilty, even though I didn't know him. That's why I'm supporting Andrew Tate, and that's why I'm supporting Russell Brand, innocent until proven guilty. Now, when proven guilty, I'll be the first to put my hands up and go, okay, they've been proven guilty, um, the evidence was undeniable, um, it's completely wrong. Um, good on the victims for speaking out, and we need to support victims. And in fact, I probably do more to support victims. That's whatā that's, that's, I think, how it should be. Anyway, let me know what you think in the comments. Is he innocent? Is he guilty? Is it right that all his sponsors and partners all seem to have, you know, disown him? You know, this smear now could be on him for 10 years even if he is completely innocent. Is this some kind of Matrix attack that some of you are saying? Is the timing a coincidence? Let me know what you think in the comments. And if there are any advancements in this case, I will let you know. I would love to interview Russell on the show, and I won't do a hatchet job with Russell Brand like Dispatches did on Channel 4. I will do a balanced, open-ended discussion, and I will challenge him, and I will also give him a chance to speak his truth like I did with Andrew Tate when others like Piers Morgan did not. So if you know Russell, connect us up. Also, if you wouldn't mind sharing this if you agree with the sentiment. And thanks for following me, thanks for tuning in. I'll keep reporting. Um, stay safe and push back against the mainstream media. Make sure that, um, you know, you stand up and speak out on the important issues, otherwise we'll all be controlled. And remember, if you don't risk anything, you risk everything.










