A short YouTube rant by Sandi L Boucher criticizing people who identify as indigenous based on distant ancestry (e.g., one indigenous ancestor many generations ago) and who present themselves as indigenous leaders or knowledge keepers. Boucher defines the term “Descendian” as used by U.S. indigenous peoples for such cases, objects to claiming indigenous status for funding/positions, and urges those individuals to unpack their intent and privilege; she references personal and family experiences of violence and discrimination as context for why misrepresentation is harmful.
Chapters
Grant warning. I decided to do this in a video so hopefully it'll save me having to deal with stupid emails in the future. Someone felt the need to send me an email to tell me how disrespectful it is to refer to someone as a Descendian. Now let me be crystal clear. We use that term U.S. indigenous peoples in use that term for someone who has one indigenous ancestry ancestor like six generations ago. And here's the important part, they are presenting themselves as a leader or a knowledge keeper for indigenous peoples. That's the problem. If only one of your puzzle pieces is indigenous. Do not present yourself as someone who carries our teachings and knowledge. I you want to call yourself indigenous, knock your freaking socks off. But if you're applying for funding or applying for positions or any kind of benefit of being indigenous and that's all the only puzzle piece you got, I'm sorry, you're a Descendian, you have a problem with it, you unpack your privilege. You unpack why you're calling yourself indigenous because you know what we what price have you paid for being indigenous? I can tell you about the violence inflicted on me and my family, I can talk about the out andout discrimination and the darker members of my family suffered even more. So don't come at me privately in an email cuz you have a problem with the term, I have a problem with your intent. Unpack that.