A short conversational transcript (YouTube) advocating 'mentoring across' — reciprocal peer mentoring among people at similar stages in life and business. Key claims: it's an equal energy exchange, peers face similar challenges (team size, finances), and exchanging complementary strengths creates a 'collective genius' that helps solve problems quickly.
I don't think people ever put enough time and energy and effort into mentoring across. These are your ride or dies. Mentoring across is an energy exchange, an equal energy exchange where you are supporting your peers.
That are at about the.
Same place as you in life and business experiencing their versions of very similar things that you're experiencing. They've got same size teams, same size.
Challenges, same size financial challenges. And the reason.
Why you need these peers that you mentor back and forth with so much is you know how you're good at.
Like one or two.
Things, you're just.
Naturally good at them and then you're really not good at.
Four or five things. Well, they're also really good at one or two different things than you. So what you end up getting is this collective genius.
So bad times.
They get it. Good times.
They get it.
Got a question.
They have the answer.
Or one of their peers does.
