The Man Who Is Curing Blindness And Alzheimers, Growing New Brain Cells & Elegantly Fabricating Some Of The Most Powerful Nootropics Know To Humankind.

Hey, what's up? It's Ben Greenfield. If my audio sounds a little funny today, it's because for some reason my stereo mixer kicked the can. I arrived home after a long trip to find it literally dead, just beat to pieces. Wouldn't turn on. I suspect it's probably because my children were attempting to record something inside of my home recording studio. In this episode of the Ben Greenfield.

Fitness Show, I think we're gonna look back historically and we're gonna look to Wim as one of the great scenes. Suppliers of protocols for adjusting state that the feelings that you feel internally were not designed for those technologies. Those technologies are hijacking those different internal states and getting, you know, not the other way around. I think the hardcore pharmaceutical use for to achieve high performance is very dangerous and I don't like to see it, especially in young people whose brains are just naturally still in a plastic state. This is the real concern.

He's an expert in human performance and.

Nutrition, America's top personal trainer and one.

Of the globe's most influential people in health and fitness.

His show provides you with everything you.

Need to optimize physical and mental performance. He is Ben Greenfield. Power, speed, mobility, balance, whatever it is for you, that's the natural movement. Get out there. When you look at all the studies done, studies that have shown the greatest efficacy.

All the information you need in one place right here, right now on.

The Ben Greenfield Fitness Podcast. Hey folks, it's Ben Greenfield and it is my pleasure to introduce you to Dr. Andrew Huberman, a recent acquaintance of mine and a pretty well decorated man in the realm of science. He is a world renowned Stanford neuroscience professor and director of what is called Huberman Labs at Stanford. His accomplishments are incredibly impressive considering he's barely over 40 years old and sorry Andrew, to have to spill your age right off the bat, but amazingly, you have accomplished a lot for your age. Scientific American has covered his breakthroughs towards curing human blindness and and Alzheimer's. Rolling Stone has interviewed him to better understand the power of fear. That was a fascinating article. Discover magazine recently covered Andrew's work with the legendary Wim Hof the Iceman, which led to research to determine how what Wim Hof can even do is possible. We'll talk about that on today's show. Andrew has made a ton of breakthrough contributions to the field of brain development and brain plasticity, neural regeneration and repair, and is quite studied in the realm of nootropics as well, which is how I met him. The good folks over at this company called Neurohacker Collective. They make one of the only nootropics that I use. They introduced me to Dr. Huberman and I have been fascinated by him and his research and what I've been able to dive into in preparation for this interview. His lab recently created a state of the art virtual reality platform for probing neural mechanisms that underlie pathologic fear and anxiety. And he is just a. A fascinating, fascinating gentleman. So Andrew, welcome to the show.

Thanks so much for having me and thanks so much for the generous introduction. I quite blessed to be alive at a time in history when there are all these amazing tools and developments and some of those tools are making their way to the general public and I'm really looking forward to the conversation.

Yeah, me too. And let's begin with a mutual acquaintance of ours, the good old iceman, Wim Hof. And Wim is of course famous for sitting for long periods of time in ice, but also injecting himself with crazy substances and then figuring out how to quell the body's inflammatory response to said substances, which I think include, you know, things like E Coli. I'm curious, tell me about the work that you did with Whim to. To look into the unique physiology that that cat has.

Yeah, Wim is quite a unique character and has achieved so much and it's really exciting to see him attain a level of stature and recognition now that he's been at it a long time. But the story goes something like this. I'm a card carrying neuroscientist as your listeners now know. But my entire life really I've been interested in tools that one can use both that's sort of like what I would call inner game tools to adjust one's state through thinking and various practices, meditation type practices, breathwork practices, etc. Writing all the way to supplementation. And what sort of, you know, kind of things that you would. Behavioral practices. And I found out about Whim, I think I heard about him on the Ferris podcast and I wrote an email to him and just said hey, I'm a neuroscientist, I run a laboratory. We mainly work on vision, but we're really interested in fear states and other types of states. And I was really intrigued by your ability documented ability for your breathing techniques to counter the effects of E. Coli as published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It's a really nice study that I had nothing to do with but it told me and basically that the results of the study were E. Coli makes people very sick.

Yeah, that's the I left my hamburger out too long. Bacteria, right?

Right. It gives you a fever, makes you want to puke, gives you diarrhea. But basically what they showed in the study was that subjects that are injected with E. Coli but then engage in so called Wim HOF breathing are able to counter the negative effects of E. Coli infection. And it's pretty remarkable study and results and it's done in a very controlled way. And I was impressed by the fact that Wim was embracing science. Cause a guy that can run up Everest in his and can do all this stuff of diving under icebergs, that's impressive. But it's really about, to me, it's really about how applicable that those skills are to the general public and how they can be used to do things like counter infection. So I wrote to Wim, Wim and I, Wim's son wrote back and then we arranged a phone call. And then I actually Wim said, well, why don't you come out to the Pyrenees and we'll do some breathing together and I'll teach you my practice. So I got on a plane and flew to Spain and we did a bunch of breathing, some mountaineering, did some pretty wild bridge sling jumps, just Wim. And I rigged those up ourselves and did those. I had a week of adventure and also got to discover the extent to which Wim HOF breathing can really adjust one's neural state so that you can get very clear thinking in high stress situations. And I was so excited by it that I decided to bring Wimp and a few of his family members out to California completely on my own dime. I just flew them out and I arranged a sort of behind closed doors talk tour at some of the major tech hubs out here, major companies with no more than say 10 to 50 people in attendance where Wim could walk people through their breathing. These weren't standard workshops. It was more that we would discuss kind of the more interesting subjective effects that people were achieving. And then I decided to extract Wim's protocols from him, really spend some time with him, figure out what are the protocols that he's using, you know, how many breaths, how many holds, how long. Because, you know, Wim's kind of an artist of breath work, as you know, I like to call him. He's kind of like the Bob Dylan of breathwork. He does all this amazing stuff. We don't know how he does it and he's not even exactly sure how he does it. He just feels into it. So, you know, he'll just say like breathe, breathe. And you know, okay, that's great. But if I have someone other than WIM in my laboratory, I need to give them a distinct protocol. And so we're now testing things like WIM HOF breathing as well as other forms of breathing like box breathing and different forms of medical type hypnosis. I would say respiration more than meditation in our laboratory and looking at how that can counter high anxiety responses, using virtual reality as the way to deliver high anxiety responses. And so that work is ongoing. We have a human trial going and we're recruiting subjects actively. And so I hope within the year of 2018, maybe early 2019, to be able to describe and publish the results of that study. And we're measuring everything from carbon dioxide to, in some cases we even have patients that have electrodes embedded deep within their brain, including their amygdala. So we're exposing these people to high fear scenarios like kjacks at white shark diving, and then they're doing breathing and we're recording from areas of the brain like the amygdala, not just by imaging or eeg, but really high resolution neuronal responses as well as in people who don't have electrodes embedded in their brain, of course. And the goal is quite simple. It's to figure out what is the signature of the human fear response. Virtual reality is the best way we know to deliver real world like stimuli to humans. Right now in the lab, what are the tools that people like WIM have developed to counter or buffer that fear response and main adaptive clear decision making because you don't want to be fearless to the point of making bad decisions. And then how can we export those protocols to very large populations of people? Everything from school children who are developing, experiencing anxiety, from either school performance or pressure, social pressure, et cetera, to adults suffering from ptsd, anxiety and phobia. And so Wim's work and his high adventure, daredevil tendencies, I really believe, leveraged through the scientific community and then back out to the general public. And you know, I'm very proud to know Wim. I'm grateful for his generosity and you know, it's been a great adventure also. We just had a lot of fun. I got to do some wild stuff with, with Wim over, over the years and I think we're going to look back historically and we're going to look to WIM as one of the great suppliers of protocols for adjusting state.

That's, that's fascinating. And by the way, that was a very impressive Wim Hof Breathe, Breathe impersonation that you did, although I believe on my podcast it was breathe, motherfucker, breathe.

Yeah, I always joke that he gets an explicative in every third word and that's part of his breathing protocol.

Every third word. And for those of you unfamiliar with this cat, go listen to the podcast that I did with him, which I will place into the show notes that you can access@bengreenfieldfitness.com neurohack but when it comes to perhaps your plans to go cage diving with great white sharks or any other fear response that you may have, or perhaps you've just eaten some raw hamburger that you suspect might be tainted with E. Coli, the Wim HOF breathing protocol is essentially 30 of what are called power breaths in which you imagine you're blowing up a balloon. You inhale through your nose or your mouth, and you exhale through your mouth in short powerful burst with a very steady pace. I like to place my hands right around my navel when I do this with the eyes closed. You do this around 30 times. You get a little lightheaded, get a little, little tingly as you. And then at the very, very end, you feel your lungs to maximum capacity. And then you let the air out and you hold that for as long as you possibly can until you kind of get this gasp reflex. And you can do multiple rounds of this. But it is fascinating. I think one of the more interesting things that I learned when I interviewed Wim was the guy doesn't really. I mean, he runs marathons in the desert without any water. And he'll climb mountains, as you mentioned, in his skivvies and bare feet. And he basically does yoga, this breath work and cold exposure. It's very impressive.

It is impressive. He's remarkably strong. He'll do planches. I mean, I don't recommend people. Well, there are two things. One is never do Wim Hof breathing in water because of the shallow water blockout possibility. But the other one is Wimble is a true daredevil. I've seen him. I've got some photos of him doing some one arm planches. Next off basic cliffs overriding a valley below. I mean, like true. I mean, the guy basically can calm his mind to the point where he's in incredible levels of control. And he is incredibly strong. And I think he's in his early 60s now or late 50s. He's also a new father, so congratulations.

Perhaps a big part of that is just being Dutch, which I would suspect when you watch the World's Strongest man competition. It appears to get you, you give you a hand up in life to just be from northern Europe if you happen to want to compete in feats of extreme physical performance. The other thing about Wim Hof I was going to ask you Andrew was, you know, I know that you're kind of involved in all these new cutting edge nootropic formulations has is the guy like one of these Modafinil, Provigil, Adderall, smart drugs kind of guys or is he just pure breath work?

No, Wim's more like breathwork. The banjo and a beer and a beer and a beer every once in a while. And you know, Wim is on the intermittent fasting thing. He eats about once a day. He doesn't seem to follow any strict nutritional protocol but he, as far as I can tell, but he is open. You know what's so nice about Wim is that he's really open to a lot of discussion about different types of things. He's not dogmatic, he's kind of anti guru and yet he has this tremendous following. You know, one thing, a very well known Silicon Valley tech mogul out here said it very clearly. The great thing about Wim Hof breathing is you feel it the first time and you feel it every time. It just kind of works the first time. You really get a shift. And then I think that's what's really powerful about it. And you know, I've speculated a little bit and at this point still speculation, but we'll have some data soon. I mean we are collecting data but we'll be able to publish the data eventually. That, you know, I think that this high, that the 30 power breaths as you describe them probably increases adrenaline. That's probably what allows the body to counter the E. Coli infection as they showed in that study. But of course when you're in conscious control of your breathing, you enter a state during the hold or the exhale, the long exhale that where you're very calm despite the presence of adrenaline in your system. And that's a really nice place to learn how to be. So that when you get a surge of adrenaline from a life event, you maintain a clarity of thinking that most people don't have the benefit of experiencing and they become more reactive to their adrenaline surge. So while Wim isn't as far as I know, into the whole nootropic scene, he's kind of hacked his own brain stem, if you will, to be able to access some of the probably the same categories of neurochemicals that things like nootropics help you maneuver back there.

Yeah, that's my understanding as well. The spike in adrenaline, I forget the name of the protein, but it's linked to increased levels of an anti inflammatory protein and then decreased levels of cytokines which they were able to measure in the study. So. Yeah, and I suppose rather than asking you all these questions about Wim, I should probably just have him back on the show at some point. So I'll do that. I need to reach out to him. I think I'll be seeing him. I believe we're speaking together at an event in Sardinia, Italy next month. So perhaps I'll sit down with him there in a nice bath. I want to also ask you a few other questions about some of the fascinating work that you do. Scientific American has actually looked into some of your breakthroughs when it comes to regrowing brain cells, specifically in rodent models. What I believe is some form of gene manipulation and exercise for fighting against glaucoma and spinal injury and Alzheimer's. Can you fill me into the research you're doing there? When it comes to blindness and Alzheimer's and specifically regrowing brain cells that I know of have a huge number of blind listeners or listeners with Alzheimer's. But of course, anytime we delve into this category, we're talking about the potential for taking an already just fine brain and making it even better. So fill me in on what you've been doing there.

Sure. So I have a fairly large laboratory and about half the laboratory works on these issues of neural regeneration and plasticity. And the specific goal of the study I'll describe was to try and figure out how is it that we could regenerate the neurons that connect the eye to the brain in blinding conditions like glaucoma, which are very common. There are about 70 million people worldwide with glaucoma that sadly their vision is. Will be impaired if they don't take steps to ameliorate that. And some of them will lose their vision no matter what. I'll just mention that these connections between the eye and the brain, we say eye to brain, but really the neural retina, which is the. It's basically a piece of your brain that was squeezed out into your eye during development. So when we say the eyes are the, you know, the window to the soul, you know that the retina is the only part of your central nervous system that's outside the skull.

That's interesting. The retina is like the anus of the gastrointestinal Tract in a way, then?

I've never heard it phrased that way, but, yeah, I suppose one could think about it in that way. So the connections between the retina and the brain are absolutely essential for vision. And in diseases like glaucoma and some cases in head trauma, those connections wither. And because they are central nervous system neurons, they don't regenerate in adulthood. What I'll just mention in a moment, it applies to this visual pathway, but is also true of the neurons that degenerate in diseases like Alzheimer's, et cetera. My lab was very interested in how could one possibly restore vision to people that were blind or were losing these neurons after head injury or disease like glaucoma. And essentially what we discovered could be encapsulated by the following statement, which was that the same things that got these neurons to grow and connect up properly during development were the same things that could get them to regenerate in adulthood. So what we discovered was that if you supply a gene therapy which increases the level of something called mtor, which stands for mammalian target of rapamycin, names not right that the neurons which normally express a lot of MTOR during development, but it goes down into adulthood, if we increase the levels of MTOR in those neurons in adulthood and then lesion or damage the optic pathway, that they would regenerate, but only a little bit. But if we then added to the formulation or the treatment visual stimulation in the form of black and white bars, essentially, that are very effective at driving the electrical activity of these retinal neurons. The retinal neurons regenerated like gangbusters. They grew their axons all the way back into the brain, which was unprecedented, really. And they not only did that, but they reconnected to their targets properly, such that the animals, in this case, it was a mouse model, were able to see again, to some extent, not perfectly, but to some extent. And on the basis of that study in animals, we. We now have a clinical trial in humans using virtual reality as a delivery system for the specific forms of visual stimulation. So we've got blind patients and patients who are losing their vision. We recently had a young patient come from South America to receive a device. We customize these virtual reality headsets so that we are monitoring where the damage is, delivering the stimulation, just around the damage and in a very specific way. And as far as we know, this is the first human clinical trial of this sort. And we're really excited to get the results. Of course, we don't know what the results are yet. And in terms of what this means for people who don't have optic nerve damage, the same principle of what we've heard during development, fire together, wire together, seems to apply in adulthood, which is that the more that neurons are active, the more they are going to survive and possibly regenerate and form new connections. Now, this is super exciting for us because what it means is that this may also pertain to the memory system and in healthy individuals. We're starting to see a number of studies and companies. I think I spotted a picture of you with the Halo device on recently. A company that I should just say I have no relationship to whatsoever. Although I think they're based here in the Bay Area and the work is grounded.

Apparently. I do.

Yeah. Which is. Right. So you may. I don't have to. But it's really grounded in the eye, in the idea that the stimulating neurons in adulthood, in combination with specific forms of experience, can enhance the plasticity of the pathways that carry that information. And I think it's super exciting that people are developing these technologies, that people are starting to look into the neuroscience literature and apply it. Most of that work with Halo was born out of the work done by a guy named Mike Merzenich, who was at ucsf, who's now retired, who had a spectacular career of doing these kinds of studies. And so while our work has been centered on neural regeneration, I guess the points to make are that these small animal studies done on mice actually can inform human studies and clinical trials very quickly. We've moved it from the animal results to human clinical trial within one year, and that those results can be leveraged towards treatments for people suffering from blinding diseases like glaucoma and brain damage, and also leverage toward making our brains better in people injured. So I think it's a very exciting time, and I'm very grateful that you brought up those results and gave me the opportunity to speak about them.

That's fascinating that when you combine a growth activation stimulus like that, in your case, you guys is activating the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway. But theoretically, this could be done via other pathways and then visual input or some form of external stimuli, if that's what stimulates brain cells to grow in the first place, or what would be needed for regeneration. It makes me think a lot about the potential for myself as an N equals one trial or a whole host of our biohacking listeners doing things like, say, consuming substances that we know can cause some form of the production of nerve growth factor or neurogenesis, you know, such as you know, lion's mane mushroom is one that I'm aware of. There are others, you know, alpha GPC is another. I know there's a, there's a host of ingredients in some of these, some, some of these nootropics that you've helped to create over at Neurohacker Collective. And those could theoretically be combined with external stimuli like tdcs with this Halo neuroscience device or say, virtual reality or some other form of stimuli. And that 1, 2 combo could potentially cause a significant amount of neurogenesis compared to the two in isolation. Am I, am I, am I going too far down that path of. No, you're spot on brain growth.

No, you're spot on. I mean, I think that one of the more exciting, although lesser discussed aspects of the adult plasticity literature. So this is, you know, one thing, we don't have to get into this now because there's the whole world of this stuff. But the rules of plasticity during development are not necessarily the same as the rules that engage in neuroplasticity in adulthood. This is something that most people don't appreciate. And in adulthood, the massive plasticity can be induced by triggering the cholinergic system, the basal forebrain cholinergic system. There are a lot of different acetylcholine promoting systems in the brain, but the one in the basal forebrain called nucleus basalis for the aficionados out there has been shown by Merzenich and colleagues in animal models to unleash a massive degree of cortical plasticity. So in other words, if the animal got an experience but no stimulation of acetylcholine, that experience didn't modify its neural circuitry very much. And if it got the acetylcholine increase but no specific experience, then there wasn't much plasticity. But the combination of the two led to a remarkable degree of plasticity. Now, I'm not going to say anything here that's prescriptive because I'm not an MD and obviously one needs to take into account their own health issues and whatnot. But I do want to mention this, which is purely anecdotal, but fact anecdotal, which is that there's a very famous Nobel prize winning neuroscientist who I noticed in meeting with him in his office was chewing Nicorette like it was going out of style. I'm not recommending this necessarily, but I asked him, right, he's a very smart and very accomplished human being, what are you doing? And he said, well, I used to Smoke to get my cholinergic stimulation, but now I chew Nicorette. And I said why? And he said, well first, and he claims that it's, that it helps him with attention and focus, which we know the cholinergic system is involved in. And he believes that it's involved in allowing him to learn well into his. Now he's in his 70s. So this I find incredibly interesting because there have, there are these brain modulatory systems or neuromodulatory systems that gate plasticity. And, and what you're pointing out is that it may be that we're arriving at a point in the history of neuroscience, biohacking, neurohacking and so forth, where the combination of brain machine interface, things like halo, virtual reality, et cetera, plus some small amount of chemical stimulation through safe supplementation combined with a very specific experience could allow one to rewire very specific aspects of their neurology. And one of the areas where I think this is going to be demonstrated first is in the area of rapid language acquisition, which is a very quantifiable thing to do in a typical subject. Like I don't, I don't speak French, I don't know any French. But it'd be fun to do an N equals one experiment to see how quickly I could learn French in combination, you know, by combining a nootropic of some sort with perhaps virtual or halo type electrical stimulation.

Wow, that'd be amazing. Bonjour.

I mean, people used to do this with cigarettes, right? Oh yeah, absolutely. But of course you get lung cancer, so that's not a good strategy.

Yeah, my airplane hack, when I've got an international flight is nicotine toothpicks or nicotine mints combined with a cup of coffee, often into which I place a little packet of lion's mane extract. So that's what I've just through my own experimentation foundation to be something that works quite well for me when I'm on an airplane flight because I can always get my hands on a cup of coffee, albeit a non organic mold laden cup of coffee, but I can get my hands on one. And I travel with these little nicotine toothpicks or nicotine mints. And that's actually a great pick me up. On a separate note, actually two separate notes. One, if anyone's listening in and you're in the supplement industry, there is a big market out there right now for some form of nicotine supplementation that does not involve sucralose or acesulfamine potassium. Because if you go and get any of the mints currently available on Amazon or the toothpicks that I use, etc, they're, they're chock full of artificial sweeteners. So I think there's a market out there for a stevia infused nicotine supplement. Just saying. And, and you can send me the royalty checks once you develop that. And then the, the other interesting thing, in addition to tdcs, using something like a halo headset, and in addition to something like a virtual reality headset, the other thing that I've been using is a very novel delivery mechanism that almost seems to drive nootropics into, into neural tissue more readily or at least enhance my sensitivity to nootropics. And their efficacy is pulsed electromagnetic field therapy or pemf. And I actually have this, this device. Well, I have several devices, but one is, it's kind of like the, the Cadillac of pemf. It's this pulse center's XL Pro. It's this giant bed that I can lay on and get massages on. It's in my basement. But there are coils that can be attached to it that you can place on either side of the head and you, you put it on a frequency very similar to like the, the Schumann resonance frequency that the earth would naturally emit and you basically sandwich your head between these two paddles. And based on our conversation now, I'm very interested in going and popping, you know, something like quality of mind, for example, and putting these paddles on, you know, for, for 10, 15 minutes and kind of seeing the results that ensue. So my, my wheels are spinning when it comes to some of these combinations. Based on this research that you're doing, it's fascinating.

Yeah, I think.

Oh, go ahead.

I was just going to say. Yeah. One thing that, to think about in terms of. So I've been starting to use the phrase self directed adaptive plasticity. You know, there are a lot of ways to get plasticity, but I think the plasticity that we're trying to talk about is self directed, where you're deciding what you learn and when and how. And one thing that we know from the literature, it's a quite strong set of results, is that the learning event should be fairly restricted. You know, you're not one. I don't think anyone's going to pop a nootropic throw on device and then go out and learn a lot of different stuff all at once. I think what you can do is go deep down a particular corridor of knowledge in that regime and maintain that knowledge or build and maintain that knowledge or skill or attribute. And so attention is one of the jobs of acetylcholine is to create a spotlight of attention. And so I find it really interesting that a lot of the nootropics are, have a strong cholinergic element to them. Not just because it's very likely to open up the opportunity for plasticity between synapses, neurons, but also that it tends to have a attention focusing component as well.

This is fascinating. I could talk to you about this alone all day long, but there was one other area before. I kind of delve into some of my specific questions for you based on neural enhancement using neurochemicals and supplementation. You also have studied the brain and its fear response. And I actually, I was reading a Rolling Stone article last night as I was preparing for this interview. And in that article, you say the brain. This exact quote from you, you say the brain. Well, I've been interviewed before for magazine articles and I'm not sure this is an exact quote from you, but this is what the magazine says that you said the brain isn't supposed to make you happy all the time. That puzzled me because in many cases we read that we are evolutionarily hardwired to seek pleasure and seek a dopamine response and to seek happiness constantly. So when you said that, what did you mean?

Yeah. I'm struck by just how much of our neural architecture is designed to detect threats, keep us safe, and lead to adaptive outcomes through paralysis and anxiety. You know, I think we've come to look at anxiety and the fear response as this thing that's pathologic, when in fact it was designed to mobilize you. So the way to think, so the way to think about anxiety and fear is that they're really just one component of the arousal of arousal. You know, you can be dead, you can be in a coma. No one wants that. You can be drowsy, you can be asleep, you can be alert and focused, or you can be alert and really hyped up, or you can be kind of fearful and panicking. And so, you know, you got these different states of arousal. And if you think about, you know, if I were to food deprive you, I know people are into the fasting thing, but if I were to food deprive most people for 24 hours, they're going to get pretty agitated. That agitation is designed to get you to go look for food. Loneliness or the sensation of being sad wasn't designed to, to get you to think about how pathetic your life is or to disappear into the Caverns of the Internet. It was designed to get you to go find a mate. It was, you know, these things that we think of as negative emotions were designed to leverage your behavior. Think about after a Thanksgiving meal or a large meal, what do you want to do? You want to lie on the couch and rest and sleep. And it's because you're, there's no anxiety. You're basically, next day there might be some anxiety about some of the things you ate, but there's, there's no anxiety. Or even the post coital bliss that people feel, that's people literally the refractory period or the post coital bliss that people experience is designed, they've accomplished what evolution wanted them to accomplish, at least temporarily, which was to reproduce. And so there isn't this strong motivation to go out and mate again, at least for some short period of time. So if you start to think about arousal and fear and anxiety as tools that biology uses to leverage your behavior toward or away from different things, then you start to realize that a lot of the brain has basically been wired to get you to do things based on your internal states rather than to feel great all the time. And so that quote was accurate. It was in the context of fear and the fear response. But essentially that's what I meant is that a lot of your neurology is designed to get you to do things the right thing as a result of the fact that you don't feel good about it. That you don't feel good. Right. So consider this the next time you disappear into a long text exchange when really your anxiety for social connection might actually have been designed to get you to actually have real face to face contact with somebody or time in the sunshine. I'm not anti technology, after all, I'm born and raised and work and live in Silicon Valley. But, but nevertheless that the feelings that you feel internally were not designed for those technologies. Those technologies are hijacking those different internal states and getting not the other way around.

And hijacking is a quite appropriate word. This concept of amygdala hijacking, where the media will use inflammatory rhetoric or specific forms of imagery to trigger our emotional brain before our logical brain has a chance to step in and identify that we are indeed being manipulated. I mean that's, that's in many cases in politics, for example, what media is doing to people. And it's, it's very interesting how if you can get to that fear response first, a lot of times you can, you can affect change in people that normally their logic would Be able to override.

That's absolutely right. It's absolutely right. I find it somewhat amusing also kind of tragic that, that these days a lot of the best technologies that are coming out are technologies to buffer us against technology. Like a lot of the meditation based apps and breathing apps. And there's a lot of discussion about technology overuse. I mean, these are potent tools. So anything, right, Nootropic, pharmaceutical, behavioral practice, even breathing practices, the cell phone, these are sharp blades, so to speak, and you have to use them appropriately.

Yeah, yeah. For, for me, nothing can replace going outside barefoot and staring blankly off into the trees in between phone calls versus, say, sitting down with headspace or putting on a VR headset. Granted, that might sound hypocritical based off of my previous comment just a few moments ago, to use technology to enhance, say, neurogenesis. But you are right, it can be ironic sometimes, the extent to which we use some of these machines. And I don't want to make people think that I, I do not argue for a balance of, shall we say, ancestral wisdom combined with better living through science.

One thing that I think is really interesting is that we're at a point in history that we've never been at before in human evolution where people are starting to think both in terms of what I call outside in versus inside out approaches to adjusting state and behavior. So inside out would be whether or not you achieve it through an app or you go outside and you go into what I like to use panoramic vision to enter relaxed or calm states, you know, or you say you stare off into the trees for a bit. You're really working on your inside out. Yes, you're using the trees and the scenery, but you're not simply looking to something else to shift your state. You're really trying to achieve that from the inside out. And for many decades, especially in the US we've been focused on outside in. What's the thing I can grab to shift me right away? And, and of course it's going to be the combination of those two. Right. Things like meditative practices or breathing practices, different visual practices, as well as things like nootropics that combined are going to give you the most powerful sense of control over your brain and your body.

Yeah, yeah. Now I want to make sure that I have time to talk to you a bit about nootropics. So first of all, of course, Million Dollar Question man, are you on a nootropic right now? I sometimes wonder whether or not someone I'm interviewing is on adderall or LSD or Lion's mane or perhaps just their third cup of coffee.

Oh goodness. I hope my responses don't imply that I'm on lsd. I am definitely not on lsd. I did take one Qualia Mind this morning.

Isn't it dose seven?

The dose is seven. I'm one of these people that, that is very sensitive to supplementation and medication. I can sense the shifts pretty readily. Full disclosure, I was an early investor in the Neurohacker Collective long before I knew what Qualia was. I actually invested in them on the basis of their overall mission as opposed to any specific product. And I have to say, quality of mind I take from time to time. It's fairly new, but it is a remarkable, in my experience, it's a remarkable effect, positive effect on energy focus and in particular, and I'm still trying to explore why this is. Maybe you can tell me, Ben, for physical performance in terms of fitness, I've just found that it's allowed me to push through a large number of physical performance barriers. I'm not a professional or even competitive athlete, but I've done a lot of martial arts, a lot of distance running, weight training, et cetera over the years and I'm finding quality of mind to be one of the most valuable things I've added to my so called stack. Although I tend to cycle things pretty readily, I don't use many things every day.

Interesting. Okay, I'm the complete opposite. I believe the last time I took Quality of Mind I popped like 8 or 9. I have a relatively high threshold to just about anything, it seems, and I don't know if that comes down to metabolism, genetics, my extreme amounts of muscle mass and how swole I am or what, but could be either way, I need more. So anyways, when it comes to nootropics for you as a neuroscientist at Stanford, do you see traditional institutions, modern medicine, mainstream academics and research kind of beginning to get interest in nootropics? I mean obviously we see things at this point in time such as psilocybin catching on based on some of the Johns Hopkins research, for example, that have been done on that, and you could even argue that that in microdosed format is considered a nootropic or something that could enhance neurogenesis. But I'm curious, running in the circles that you run in, what you currently would say is the is. Is the chatter amongst professional academia or medicine when it comes to nootropics?

Yeah, great question. So I think there's an eye Toward them, meaning people are starting to pay attention to this nootropic thing. You know, you've got varying levels of sort of vintage or maturity in any scientific field. You know, my neuroscience colleagues at Stanford and beyond are incredibly smart, open minded people who pay attention to data, right? We're driven by facts more than opinions. And it's not a culture of sort of marketing driven stuff where people make very strong claims. Of course, being in the Bay Area, many local academics at Stanford and elsewhere have been involved in large companies like Genentech. And the Bay Area is just covered with companies like that that were born out of academic laboratory discovery. So. So to be a little more succinct about it, I don't know of any laboratories at major institutions like Stanford that are focused on nootropics per se. And we could talk about why that is because they tend to be kind of more formulations than single ingredient products. But I think one just has to look to the student population. So, you know, when I talk, I've never taken Adderall or Ritalin. You know, when I was in college I drank coffee to stay up. And I am shocked and frankly a little bit frightened by what has been reported back to me when I've asked graduate students, undergraduates, and this just isn't at Stanford. This is all major universities, right, and high schools. That the amount of Ritalin and Adderall sharing and abuse, it's purely abusive. It's, you know, people are, are trading and selling this stuff, I think is really quite frightening to me. I'm sure those drugs have valuable applications in real prescriptive disease states. But I think people are desperate for things that will allow them to achieve the neural states, if you will, that lend themselves best to studying, learning and retention of knowledge without putting themselves into addiction risk or health risk. And so I think nootropics are going to start to emerge more and more on the scene. And as that happens, the universities, because they were designed to serve the general public, are going to be forced to really do some controlled studies. And I'm looking forward to those controlled studies. Now what I will say is that not a week goes by these days without someone asking me about nootropics. The number one question I get from anyone over 50 when I say I'm a neuroscientist, they say, how do I keep my memory? This is the number one anxiety provoking thought is that in older people is that they're going to lose the context of their life. They're just going to be walking around not knowing where they were a few minutes ago or who they were a few moments ago. That is an absolutely terrifying idea to most people.

I hope you tell them to keep their finger on the pulse of their glycemic variability is one of the top strategies there.

Yes, super interesting. So for instance, I think there are a lot of, I should say I consult for the Cognitive Health Institute out in Florida, which is, there are a number of these cognitive institutes now popping up which are taking a kind of wellness approach in addition to other approaches like infusions of platelet rich plasma and things like this. These are sort of non traditional approaches, but what people believe are powerful approaches to offset things like cognitive decline, geared at both reducing inflammation, adjusting blood sugar levels properly and you know, here's a different kind of succinct answer to your question. Are major institutions paying attention to things like nootropics and things like, like regulation of blood sugar for things like Alzheimer's? Well, it's interesting because no one is immune from knowing somebody. Whether or not you're a professor or you're an MD these days, you come into contact with your own family members and friends who are experiencing issues with cognitive decline or health issues of various sorts, or who have children that are struggling with anxiety or school performance or learning issues or addiction for that matter. And, and you can't avoid the fact that people need things now. Right? I mean, one of the reasons I like to sit somewhat at the interface of traditional science and I guess you'd call wellness or neurohacking, is that, you know, I can talk all day about the latest discoveries in animals, but the real key thing is, you know, what to do about it, what to do with that information. And when you have somebody who's suffering from Alzheimer's or who's getting older and wants to maintain their memory or wants to perform at their very best in school, they're going to look to do something now. And I think that wouldn't it be great if we could give people a supplementation regime that would allow them to explore the space of, you know, what works for them. Like I take one quality of mind, you take eight. Right. You know, and that's just developed. We know what works for us. And so I think that the time is coming. It's sort of, we're on the horizon of this, but it's going to happen first in the students and general public and then make its way to the university. Unfortunately not, not the other way around. And we could talk about why that's the case, but A lot of that has to do with kind of federal funding structures and things like that. More than a lack of interest or a lack of care on the part of the academic community, because I'm not the only one that has deep interest and care for what's going on in the general public. It's just that most laboratory science is geared toward highly reductionist, sort of inject this dose response into different mice, look at the lethality, look at the effects, et cetera.

Now, I mentioned Modafinil earlier and a lot of people will use that, AKA Provigil. There are, there are other kind of more common, I guess what you might call synthetic smart drugs or even prescription drugs that are used as stimulants and often as smart drugs. I suppose a lot of ADHD or ADD medications could fall into that category as well. There are things like Adderall, for example. What kind of issues exist with the use of these? Because it's quite prevalent. I mean, many, many folks from Silicon Valley to Wall street are using these drugs for extreme productivity.

Well done, with a proper prescription and monitoring by a physician, there's always still going to be some risk. I mean, I think what you're referring to is that a lot of people are using them kind of pseudo recreationally.

Recreational use of Modafinil, Ritalin, et cetera.

Yes, right. Y. I mean, the real issue is the potential for addiction, right? I mean, these are drugs that chemically look very similar to amphetamine. And you know, the dopaminergic reward pathways of the brain evolved again, like the arousal system, to bias you towards certain behavior, certain foraging behavior, to look for food, to look for a mate, to look for warmth when it's cold, to look for coolness or water when you're thirsty. And those are. Your dopamine drip system is like a drip irrigation system that's highly regulated. These drugs throw off the regulation in those dopamine pathways so that you get a huge bolus of reward. It's like winning the lottery the first time to your brain. It's like winning the lottery the first time you do it, and then your kind of hedonic set point, as they say, can be reset. People will work very hard. I mean, you just look at what drug addicts will do in order to get their heroin right. They will work extremely hard. Most, most heroin addicts manage somehow, even the ones wandering the street to find hundreds of thousands of dollars each year to feed their habit. They'll do all sorts of terrible things in order to do it. Now, Ritalin may not motivate people to do that to the same extent. And again, I'm talking about these are people that are not being prescribed Ritalin or Modafinil. But in addition to being quite expensive, Modafinil is quite expensive. Our Modafinil is a little bit less expensive. People are tapping into these dopamine systems in a very, very robust way. And especially if there's a backdrop of a propensity for addictive behavior or sensation seeking, you can really get into a regime pretty quickly where one can't think clearly without them, where you're not confident that you can perform well without them. It's a very slippery slope, I think, especially in the younger population.

One thing I should throw in there that I don't think is discussed enough, the active population. There are a lot of crossfitters, athletes, Spartan racers, triathletes, etc. Who are also hard charging high achievers in academia or in the business place who listen to this podcast and who use these substances. I myself will occasionally use LSD or plsd. I don't use Modafinil, particularly because of some of the liver processing issues that occur upon its use. I mean it's got, even at high dosage, not a ton of liver toxicity, but it still does have some liver processing. And I'm careful with things like that when I have alternatives. But ultimately I don't get hungry when I use some of these substances such as, you know, microdoses of an entheogen based substance like a psilocybin, or microdoses of something like LSD or plsd. Because I'm getting my dopamine hit per se via other mechanisms and it seems to quell hunger while at the same time producing a large amount of of physical activity and exercise drive. I am very careful. I use something like this about once every one to two weeks on particularly intensive writing days on which I don't really have a lot scheduled other than just staring at my computer writing for 25 minutes, walking away for five minutes, coming back, rinsing, washing and repeating for four to six hours. But for people using this type of thing on a daily basis, quelled appetite, extreme drive towards physical activity and or for work productivity, I can see a real risk for overtraining, for burnout, for I don't wanna, I don't wanna. Well, I'm gonna use the catchphrase adrenal fatigue, even though that' sit's a multifactorial issue. But ultimately I think pure burnout, almost like pushing the fast forward Button on. Life is a real risk when you have an unbalanced dopamine driven smart drug versus a more balanced approach.

I couldn't agree more. I think that people will always look to maximize their capacity without thinking necessarily about the after effects. And I don't mean that you're going to end up dissolved into a puddle of tears for a decade after doing some hard driving work and intense supplementation of various proper supplementation. I think what you and I are talking about here are people that are feeling the pressure to always be at their, you know, working at the 99th percentile. And once you taste that output, once you are forever seeking that kind of, that front edge of performance, you know, far better to really become a deep thinker and you know, hacking your own neurology and biology in a way that's more sustainable and that's, I don't say all that just as of kind, kind of vapors and fluff because there's a lot, you know, I said, nothing there was that I said was actionable. But you know, I suppose to make it actionable. I'm personally a fan of as you described, having a couple nature based tools of say I like to use panoramic vision to enter calm states. I also do a form of practice where I'll use a focus state. I've taught myself to focus on a single point for a long period of time to learn how to just enhance my focus when reading or writing or staying on top of and then to also have, if you're into sort of ingestible neurohacking, the nootropics. I, you know, again I have a business relationship to them but I'm a tremendous fan of quality of mind and the stuff that they're developing over at the Neurohacker Collective simply because they put so much care and thought into the formulations. So that's an ingestible thing that I use from time to time. People are drinking coffee left and right. So I think that it's fair to say that nootropics are a, are a good consideration if not alternative. And of course combined with coffee if you can handle the kind of upstate that puts you in great. And then you've got your Wim hof breathing. So I think the hardcore pharmaceutical use to achieve high performance in my opinion is dangerous and I don't like to see it especially in young people whose brains are just naturally still in a plastic state. This is the real concern is that the experiment is now being done on the general public of taking things like Ritalin, which isn't being prescribed and is being shared. These kids are essentially rewiring their neurology toward higher thresholds for dopamine release. That worries me. It worries me deeply. What doesn't worry me is when a physician is working closely with a family and taking care of a kid who's taking Ritalin. That's an appropriate use. But I think here in Silicon Valley and beyond, people are so hyped about the opportunity to achieve a superstate that they're not really considering the darker side. And it's great to hear. I'm grateful that you have this nuanced view of it. And yet you're also willing to be on the, on the cutting edge there and trying things and reporting back to the public. I think the wellness community now is serving a very important role with, you know, highly vetted information through people like you who are just bringing forward ideas and protocols and directing people toward things that are highly useful. I sit squarely within the academic science community and I can say that, you know, there is no such role for that in the university just yet. And maybe someday there will be. Maybe someday there will be departments of neurohacking at major universities. You know, you never know.

Now, in terms of athletic performance, obviously some of this stuff does have an ergogenic performance enhancement capability. Are you familiar with or do you follow much, for example, water regulations on things that would be found in popular smart drugs or whether these type of compounds that many people are consuming would be considered what we would call a PED or performance enhancing drug in sport?

I don't follow closely which ones are allowed and which ones are not allowed at the level of professional athletics. What I do know is that, you know, increasing cholinergic transmission, for instance, will increase reaction times. I think back in the 80s and 90s, sprinters were using them to get faster out the blocks. You know, the ability to get quickly out the blocks is when the gun goes off is going to be. Can afford a tremendous advantage. And so they certainly can afford an advantage. But which ones fall into the category of banned versus not banned? I'm not, I'm not versatile.

Well, let me ask you this then. Are you a cheater if you use smart drugs to get ahead in university? That's honestly something that I think has sparked controversy of late. For example, Duke, I know, is one of the few academic institutions that actually has a policy on the use of what they call cognitive enhancing drugs. And they have an academic code that lists the use of those without a prescription as pure Cheating. What's your take on that?

That's really interesting. I did not know that. I think this is a really interesting topic, the field of neuroscience. When I started, as you mentioned, I'm 42 years old. When I started in biology and psychology, there was no field of neuroscience. There was neurochemistry and neurobiology. No one could agree on a name. So this is an incredibly young field. Right. So now we have this field of neuroscience and there's ongoing discussion about important ethics, everything from, like, to what extent do we have free will or what's the role of faith in neuroscience. And I think this is a topic that. This is the first time I've heard about this or thought about this seriously. Now that you brought it up, this is something that needs to be discussed and I would, in fact, on the basis of what you just told me, I'm going to table this as a topic, kind of emerging theme for the Society for Neuroscience meeting next round, it'll be in 2019. I have a lot of relationships to people at National Institutes of Health that are on the neuroside and of course to the Society for Neuroscience and other societies. I think this is an issue that needs to be discussed as a panel. I'm not avoiding an answer, but, you know, if I look at it from. If I compare to physical sports, for instance, I mean, I've always thought there should be natural competition and then open, chemically enhanced competition and that everybody should know which is which. I think that's the fairest way to do it. I think you're going to have a hard. I don't think if you had to really push me for an answer. I don't think it's cheating for someone to enhance their cognition, because where do you draw the line? I mean, caffeine will enhance your cognition up to a point, but it's kind of the bell shaped curve where at some point it falls off or you get so jazzed up that you can't think and you can't remember properly. So I don't think of it as cheating.

It seems that the stronger, harsher stimulants, particularly the synthetic ones, ones are the ones that are raising the most eyebrows. You know, the World Anti Doping association does list modafinil, adraphanil, phenylpiracetam and one called selegalene. And I'm not quite sure if I'm pronouncing that properly on their list of prohibited substances and methods for competitive sports. And honestly, another one is on there as well, a DHEA which is a common nootropic ingredient for wada. And then when you look at esports, electronic sports, where there's a, there's a huge amount of money right now they're drug testing a lot of their competitors for performance enhancing drugs, including many of these more synthetic brain drugs. I believe some of the racetams for example, are included among those, possibly nupept as well. So yeah, it's really interesting. I mean I'm, you know, for me personally, I kind of like to see doped up football players hitting each other a lot harder because they're able to go out there and enhance their bodies, you know, to a much higher degree than a normal human being should be capable of doing. So they're like gladiators in an arena and it, I think can be considered pure entertainment. I'm a complete libertarian. I say, you know, may the best man win using whatever methods are, are available. At least that's the way that I'm tempted to think, like I lean that way. But then at the same time, when I look at my own twin sons, river and Taran, or I look at, you know, a young high school athlete, they're looking up to a lot of these people as role models. They're perhaps making decisions that might not be healthy under the impression that anything goes. And perhaps for the uneducated person, grabbing modafinil to them is just as just the same thing as grabbing say, qualia mind, even though there are some pretty significant differences in terms of health risks. So it's a real can of worms. I imagine we'll probably open up a lot of comments on this particular podcast from people who pipe in on it. But I don't want to give people the impression that I approve of breaking any type of standards when it comes to WADA or USADA or International Global Sporting Organization standards. But I do think that in some cases the standards begin to get a bit silly when you say, okay, you can have a few cups of coffee but you can't take a racetam, right?

I mean, I think that I agree and I'm glad you stated it that way. I mean, anything that breaks the rules of play is not right. If you have an issue with it, then you should go at it at the level of rules and regulation, not try and sneak. Right? But it's very interesting when you start thinking about it in terms of cognitive performance because I always think in any regime, whether or not you're a scientist or an athlete or, you know, you've got, there's incompetence where. Right. There's competent, then there's skilled, then there's, you know, talent kind of gets superimposed in this. But I'll trade out talent for skilled because talent's kind of a like an inborn thing. We think of it that way. Then there's mastery and then there's virtuosity. Now, no supplement or drug is going to allow someone to go from incompetent to virtuosity or from competent to, you know, to mastery automatically. What, what we see and what you're saying you appreciate in football players, I think, is the same thing that's appreciated in academia and in science and in the development of new technologies of all kinds, which is when you take somebody who's already performing at a high level, they've achieved a level of, say, of high skill, and they now add something that gives them some leverage over their neurology or their body, they can move into mastery or even into virtuosity in a very even way. But it's a myth and it's a mistake to think that one can kind of bypass these stages. So, you know, your college freshman who's falling behind because they're sleep deprived and decides to start abusing Adderall or Ritalin, the outcomes are not going to be good in the long term. You know that. But somebody who's taking very good care of themselves, and this is what I'd like, really like to see promoted in universities is that, you know, there's sort of wellness. There's a look to wellness now. You know, got yoga classes, meditation. People are able to access things like clinical counseling and therapy for people that are stressed and depressed because, you know, college is stressful, being an entrepreneur is stressful. You know, you're often isolated, hardworking means sleep deprived. You often don't have the finances for optimal nutrition and so forth or circumstances for that. You know, you want to see people taking really great care of themselves. And then, and only then, if they think that it's going to afford them a distinct advantage for their goals to then boost their output by virtue of a legal, nootropic or legal supplement of some sort to enhance performance. I think that's where it's a rational, insane approach. Anything else to me just seems like overkill. And it'll work in the short term, but there's going to be a brick wall to pop up pretty quick in front of that individual at some point.

Point, yeah. Huge can of worms. We could probably do a whole podcast on, on this alone. Ultimately, by the way. If you're listening and you have something to say about this, go to BenGreenfieldFitness.com neurohack where the shownotes are and leave your thoughts on the legality of smart drugs and everything from WADA and USADA sanctioned sports to esports to even a university setting. Now, many of the folks listening in, I think are probably kind of unfamiliar with, with this whole idea behind Neurohacker Collective and particularly this qualia mind stuff. My own exposure to it is that it's kind of similar to the to qualia, which I've in the past called the God pill because of its effects from a nootropic standpoint. And many people complain that it was a bit clunky because it needed to be taken in step one on an empty stomach and then step two with food contained a whole host of ingredients, I believe over 42 ingredients. And so it was quite a handful of different things to take and a lot of pills. And so I think from what I understand, you guys went back to the drawing board and made something new that didn't have to be split into two doses. And that also involved taking fewer pills in your case, one. But anyways, the other thing that, that I know about this newer form of the nootropic that you guys are working on is that it contains something called a celastrus, which is I believe, also known as the intellect tree, which kind of caught my eye and which I even wrote an article on after I went in and kind of researched the fascinating. You know, a lot, a lot of rodent research, but a lot of, kind of, kind of ancestral wisdom when it comes to the traditional use of this, this intellect tree for everything from, from enhanced cognitive function to better memory to an increase in brain content of different phospholipids. So it's very interesting from a neuroprotective and an antioxidant effect on neural tissue. And so I know this new quality of mind stuff has that in it, this fringe intellect tree stuff. But I'm curious, in your opinion, what would you say are the main differentiating characteristics of something like this? Almost like what might at first glance be considered to be a shotgun formula with a bunch of stuff randomly thrown in and other popular nootropics out there, because blends are, blends are all over the place. You know, there's siltep, there's, there's, there's alpha brain, there are, you know, coffees with a whole bunch of different nootropics added to them. I mean, what's, what's the difference? What's unique and how this thing come to be? And yes, that was the longest question ever.

No, it's a great question. And so again, to clarify and it's, it's not a disclaimer. I just want to be clear where I stand with respect to Neurohacker Collective and is I came in as an early investor based on their mission to be a hub of sort of biohacking, neurohacking tools, some supplementation, some brain machine interface and other tools. I tried Qualia.

You can just come right out and say it. You're biased as hell, but I still want you.

Well, I'd like to see them succeed in their overall mission for sure, and I have a financial incentive there. But, but I'll say that in terms of their development of formulations, I'm not listed as a formal advisor, but I talk to the folks there a lot. I like to think they value my opinion. It's only one, but it's a fairly informed opinion and I'll talk to them a lot. Here's why I was excited about trying quality of mind and then why I'm really so excited about the effects. I am personally not a fan of using dhea, which was in the initial quality of formulation but is no longer I believe in.

That was a big concern from a lot of my listeners who are professional athletes. They couldn't use it.

Yeah, I just don't like to do anything that directly tinkers with my hormone axis. I mean, that's a whole other topic. Maybe a different podcast sometime or offline discussion. I didn't want to take a hormone and I'm also hypersensitive to turmeric. I don't really like turmeric. I know people are really hyped about turmeric. We talk about why that is. But I don't like the deep. The DHT lowering effects of turmeric just don't feel good to me. And so the quality of mind has neither turmeric nor dhea. And then now qaly of course doesn't have dhea. So I took Qualia Mind thinking, okay, well it doesn't, you know, it looks like something that's attractive to me. I'm going to give this a shot. And what I find I mentioned the effects earlier, I feel like has great energy enhancing effects, has great focus enhancing effects, has great physical performance enhancement effects for me. And what I think lies at the heart of the formulation, just because there are a number of different ingredients, is that it's actually a fairly low dose, even at the recommended seven pills, of a variety of things. So first of all, all the quality of the ingredients that those guys put in is extremely well vetted. They're just quality control freaks, and that's great. The second thing is that they're tapping into this cholinergic pathway as well as the dopaminergic and noradrenergic path at low levels. And then of course, there's some high quality, fairly low level of caffeine in there as well. And then there's some of the more kind of what I would call sort of more esoteric things out there. And I can never pronounce it like the solastris, right, which are getting at some of the sort of metabolic pathways within the brain that are likely to work in concert with the neuromodulation to enhance the overall effect. And so when you look at the formulation, there's actually nothing in there that's high. It's not a high dose of anything. And at the same time, the synergy among the ingredients is remarkable. And so this is where it really, you know, biohacking departs from kind of standard laboratory neuroscience or other kinds of science, where by definition we have to look at, say, a dose response of a single ingredient and analyze it. Right. And so I think qualia mind has this capacity to be very potent through synergy, and at least again, in my hands, has felt like a great supplement. And this is what I'm hearing all around. I find it kind of laughable when people say, oh, there were too many pills in the supplement. It's a pill. When people say, it's a horse pill, it's like, what's the big difference? You drink one more sip of water. The fact that people are afraid of swallowing pills kind of makes me worry about them in the first place. I'm not saying people should be popping pills left and right, but the fact that something's a big pill or a small pill, should it really matter? So that kind of thing is kind of made me laugh when I look at some of the comments, like, oh, look at these horse pills. The pills are too big. Really? Okay. I kind of worry about people in general.

You're talking to a guy who will just put 30 in my hand and put him in the mouth and wash them back with a glass of water. There are, I believe it's Tim Ferriss, who you mentioned earlier, has a great video out there about how to take 30 some pills at once on YouTube.

Right. And there's a generational effect here. This is kind of circling back to an earlier question. But you know, I remember when I first started, started taking supplements when I was in my teens and people were saying, don't you just have to eat right? Now those same adults who are entering their 60s and 70s are asking me what they should take. Right. And I'm not an md they say, what should I take? You know, it's kind of funny. Supplements, resistance training, yoga, breath work, meditation, those, those tools are now seen as valuable tools. And I think nootropics are, you know, I think within a year, like we have the same, we reach back a year from now, now we reach back to this conversation, we're going to say, wow, what a shift there's been. And I really have to tip my hat to the NHC guys and all the other folks out there who are developing quality safe supplements that would be classified as nootropics because it's great to be, they're kind of first to market and they're moving early in the game. I think that other nootropic formulations that are out there, because you asked about this, have some of these same properties and even some of these same ingredients. Very few of them seem to include as many at such low doses. Right. Most of them tend to hinge their effects on having a much higher dose of fewer things. And just from a kind of a scientific perspective, I don't, in a kind of medical and ethical perspective, I don't like to push any system in my body or my brain so hard that I feel like it risks kind of override or you know, the word burnout comes to mind. But you know, a nice even cocktail is what it is.

Yeah, yeah. And you know, the list, it's kind of a similar idea as the original qualia, meaning you've got nootropic compounds and what are called neurovitamins, but then they're blended with antioxidants to get rid of any risk of cellular damage and also just enhance brain repair or blood brain barrier integrity adaptogenic compounds. So there's a little bit of a, you could almost argue it has a bit of an anti aging effect in terms of the longevity department. There's I believe 10 different japtogenic extracts in there, amino acids which are a building block for neurotransmitters and then choline donors, which I've found to be kind of the key for not getting a, getting a crash when you're, when you're using something like this. So you know, the, the list you can Certainly view online if you go to Ben Greenfield fit fitness.com neurohack I'll link over to Qualia Mind but you know it's everything from Huperzine to to dha not dhea, dha, artichoke stem, ginkgo biloba, mucuna prurienne. So a little bit of a dopaminergic effect, you know, L Theanine which knocks some of the edge off the caffeine. Alpha GPC which we talked about earlier which is great for neurogenesis or combining with crazy video games. A lot, a lot in there. And it is as I've mentioned many times on podcasts and articles before. I don't want to sound like a shill for the product but at the same time, you know, I had no involvement whatsoever with Neurohacker Collective and somebody gave me a few pills to try and I was blown away. I used it for stage speaking still do often use it prior to just about any cognitively demanding activities. And I would say say three to depending on the days or the or the weeks rather demands to five times per week I'm using it. So I'm a fan of the stuff. You can go to bengruffelfitness.com neurohack and also what I'm going to do is I've been taking notes as I'm speaking with Andrew. Notes on nicotine, articles on WIM hof, all of the articles that Andrew has been featured in regarding curing human blindness and Alzheimer's. The article with Rolling Stone on the power of fear also link to little things mentioned during the episode such as Tim Ferriss video in which he swallows 25 pills at once and a really thought provoking article about whether you're a cheater if you use smart drugs to get ahead. A lot in there in the show notes today they're jam packed. So go to BenGreenfieldFitness.com neurohack to check those out. And then finally if you decide to go over to the Neurohacker Collective website site, we've got a 15% discount code. If you want to try this stuff, I'll put it in the show notes for this episode. But it is if you if you're taking smart drugs and your memory is sharp as a steel trap, it's greenfield 2018. Greenfield 2018. If you want 15% off, I have no clue what happens if you're listening to this and it's 2024, perhaps that'll be Evergreen. I make no promises, but either way Greenfield 2018 gets you 15% off over at the quality website and you can get there, just go to BenGreenfieldFitness.com neurohack that's BenGreenfieldFitness.com Neurohack Andrew, I kind of scratched the surface as far as everything that you're an expert in and everything that you're doing in the realm of stem cells, in the realm of self discipline and willpower and grit, in the realm of fear and even that curing blindness and Alzheimer's piece, we could have probably done an entire podcast on that or of course as I mentioned, and the legality of smart drugs. But I just want to say thank you for coming on the show, for the time that you were able to make it and sharing this stuff with us.

Oh, thank you so much. I really appreciate the opportunity to come on here. I love this topic and I'm really excited for the hopefully expanding roles of traditional science in the kind of wellness and performance communities, because that's really the access point for most of the general public is not through the university. And you were very thorough in the references to links. If I may. And it's a completely non commercial request here. But one thing that would be wonderful for us, if any of your listeners are interested, we are recruiting subjects for our studies of fear and courage using virtual reality. And we're interested in people that have anxiety, that don't have anxiety, that have phobias, et cetera. And if I could just, we generally act people through our either lab website, which is hubermanlab.com or through our Instagram, which is Hubermanlab, all lowercase H U B E R M A N L A B as in bulldog. That would be wonderful. Just because it's hard to access a large number of potential subjects and there you would be contributing of course to the scientific process and we would be grateful to anyone who's interested in being in our virtual reality studies of fear. And of course, if you have visual impairments, you can contact me via my ophthalmology link for our clinical trial. I hope it's okay to throw that out there. It really helps the scientific process. We rely on the general public for that and indeed it's your tax dollars that paid for those studies. So we'd be ever grateful. And I want to thank you, Ben. I really appreciate the depth of rigorous that you bring to your work and your extreme curiosity is wonderful. And when you combine those two things, you know, we all learn so much. So I've learned a tremendous amount from you and I'm very grateful.

Awesome, man. And to enhance my bow hunting skills, I may actually be in touch with you about the whole eyesight piece. Perhaps we.

Terrific.

We can work on that together.

Great.

Anyways though, folks, the shownotes are@BenGreenfieldFitness.com neurohack until next time, I'm Ben Greenfield along with Dr. Andrew Huberman signing out from BenGreenfieldFitness.com have an amazing week. You've been listening to the Ben Greenfield Fitness podcast. Go to BenGreenfieldFitness.com for even more cutting.

Edge fitness and performance advice.

Sam.