Attentat à Manchester

Hello, my friends. There was an attack that hit the north of England in Manchester last night. Children were particularly targeted. There was an Ariana Grande concert. She is 23 years old, but you would think she was 14 when you saw her. She started her career a long time ago, so she was extremely young. And she was followed by a demographic of people who today are between, lets say, 9 and 20 years old. And by the way, this is the population where the majority of the victims are. So the English are shocked. They say we have reached a new low where children are particularly attacked because they are used to seeing children hit as collateral targets, but not targeted. But it is indeed a low, but it is not a new low yet. You know, when we see, when we see in Syria, for example, or in Iraq or elsewhere, we see terrorists who really target children and do not hesitate to film themselves with the bodies and all that. And in general, Westerners have a different reaction than they do today for the Manchester attack. There you have it. A year ago, just before I recorded, I saw the news a year ago, a guy called Salman Abedi, 23 years old. So I tell you this in quotation marks, I am not extremely convinced that this is really the terrorist in question. Because just like that, a 23 year old Muslim named Salman, he is like a German, 60 years old, who would be called a Dolph. I mean, since the Salman Rushdie affair of infamous memory, let's just say that this name has a very bad reputation in the Islamic world. I can't imagine someone going with a baby 23 years ago to a prefecture and saying, here, I'm going to call him Salman. Just that. Okay, What I'm saying is very light, I know, but you have to wait for the, you have to wait for confirmation. The English, the English, you know, I'm telling you this without any irony. I think that today they're going to dedicate a huge number of police forces to monitoring the Internet to see if there are people making Islamophobic remarks. Because you have to know that the defense of Islam has become a kind of dogma here in society, in the elite rather, who run this, this country. It's part of today, they are using their dogmatic arsenal. Uh, they are. We have to understand each other, right? When I said Islam, for those who are not watching the video but listening to it in their car or whatever I put it with, I made a hook sign with my fingers. That is to say that today, England, the English, as much as they defend Sunni Islam, okay, uh, they also encourage Shiite Islamophobia okay? For those who have not seen the previous videos or others, just a crash, crash course, as they say. Just a small difference between the two. They have the same Prophet, the same God, the same Quran. The only difference between Sunnis and Shiites, if you like, is that Sunnism has taken for itself practically all the feudal law of the Middle Ages. It has added to the religious corpus that is an integral part of the religion today. The Sunni school, including dogma, or rather veneration, if you will, when the people of that school for the Arab men of power. So all the lords, the Arab men of power. And that of course includes their children, that includes their mercenaries, that includes them. Well, practically all the people who gravitated around them have today become practically objects of veneration. So if you, for example, today you convert to Islam and you say, I am very happy, I believe in Allah, the Prophet and the Quran, be careful, they can kill you for that. You are not a Muslim. According to the majority of Muslims today, you are not a Muslim. You would even deserve death if you believe in Allah, the Quran and Muhammad. Okay, that is not possible. You would also have to believe in the Arab men of power. If you reject the Arab men of power, you are a Shiite, and then you can be killed for that. By the way, you should know that when terrorist groups, Sunnis, there are more than 300 in the world. When they kill a Westerner, they kill 200 Shiites. This means that today practically killing Muslims who do not believe or who do not venerate Arab leaders is more important than killing non believers. However, I say this while being aware of the deep hatred they have against non believers. Okay? For them, anyone who does not believe in Sunni Islam is a member of the Sunni Islam and therefore of Arab leaders is a non believer. So I was telling you that this man who is cited as the terrorist, I say this with reservation, was known to the police. There's the Sunni terrorist group isis, which claims responsibility for the attack, of course, not surprisingly. And there you have it. We are in a situation today where this society must make a choice. A choice that in my opinion, is not very difficult. It is obvious. It is simple. They must choose between their dogmas, between nurturing their dogmas, maintaining their dogmas. That's probably what they're going to do between us and choosing the lives of their children. That's all. Today, 22 children have died. There are probably more to come because according to the authorities, many children are between life and death. So the provisional toll is 22 out of 22 victims, these victims are direct victims. There will be a lot of indirect victims like here. Collectively we're probably going to see laws that are liberticidal, that will soon strike again to reduce our freedom of movement, to further reduce our right to privacy, to reduce our right to go to shows or public gatherings without having to be searched extensively or spied on or whatever. But unfortunately, where Islam is gaining ground, there is necessarily, if you like, totalitarianism that is coming. Because you can't have a society, whether Muslim or with a strong Muslim component that isn't run by a dictator, by an iron fist. In fact, it's not possible, it doesn't exist. It's. You just look at the Arab Muslim countries. They are, they are all states, let's say more or less totalitarian, with a large democratic deficit and all that. But there is only one way to manage them. That is to do it one way. That's all. The problem is that the English, due to their dogma, probably won't want to face reality, probably won't want to get to the source of the problem. They will probably want to go into an over security situation. First of all, there were people who criticized the security of the hall. The problem is that the hall was secured at the entrance. Indeed, when people arrive in small groups, they go through security gates and so on. Now when the show ends, they all leave at the same time. So what should they do when they leave? Should we still, I don't know, create a security perimeter around each performance venue? Should we let people leave one by one at the end of the show? Increased security leads nowhere. There's no way out. Let me give you an example. When organized crime began attacking banks with great success and also cash in transit facilities, what did the professionals in the sector do? They invested heavily in securing their establishments so that it became more profitable, it became more feasible to attack these places, banks or cash in transit facilities. And they started attacking convenience stores, attacking tobacconists, attacking places that were, let's say in easier but that didn't have the means to protect themselves. Well, it's the same for. It's the same for, for performance venues. They can secure them, double the ticket price to pay for this security. Because in any case someone has to pay. And then there you have it. You might have to give your identity a week before going to a show. You'll have to undergo all the searches and so on to give your email password to get into a show. The problem is that it won't solve anything because later on they could attack, I don't know, a nursery school or a daycare or people walking on the sidewalk. I mean, well, you're not going to build watchtowers around a daycare or something. I mean, that's why. Just going completely downstream, going completely downstream of the problem and trying to make it completely secure by securing the targets of the last attack, targets similar to the last attack. And often, often just a psychological fix, but which has no long term effectiveness. There you have it. When I have seen my country wrought through similar mechanisms, I have made videos, I have made many, many videos that I am trying to formulate a warning, to put it mildly. But unfortunately, I think people have to live through this in order to understand it. But the problem is that once they understand it, their country is rotten to the core and there is no turning back. That is also the problem, huh? Jihad, if you like. Because the terrorist attack will be described as jihad by those who committed it, those who support it, and there are many of them. Jihad is a transposition of what is called the right of war or the right of host, which is a feudal right in Muslim Sunni law, if you like. During the feudal era, the lord, the landowner, had the right to levy a certain number of vigorous fasts each year from among the lords and use them to wage wars. So these could be wars of rivalry with his cousin, wars of expansion, wars for various interests. And the lord had the duty to give his child so that he could go and fight for the benefit of his lord. And in fact, jihad is nothing more than that. When you read books, take, I don't know, Ibn Kutam al Muhalichi. And then you look at Al Mornafar, which is a book, practically the book of all theology students, volume 13. You go to the beginning, you open it, it starts talking about jihad. And the definition they gave is exactly that of the right of hostility. It is each group, huh, it is f who does so. Each group must give a man so that he can go and participate in the jihad once a year to try to invade lands for whom? Well, for the lord feudal, for the Caliph or equivalent who is the head of the Arab Muslim country. And there you have it. And people were proud to go and do it, just as many gu were proud to go and serve their lord. And then when the Arab or Muslim dies, well, they promise him, don't worry. You see, you live in the misery of Gu. You're going to die for your lord. You bring him camels full of captive women, gold, good food, conquered lands, and so on. And then, well, don't worry if you die on the way. Oh, I have a huge list like that, like a roll of wallpaper. God, what he's going to give you for having given your life for your lord, in fact. Because, you know, they say that jihad is for Allah, but in the end it's ultimately Allah. I mean, if it's a deity, I imagine that God, everything belongs to him, the earth, the universe and so on. You don't need to go kill the other guy next door to take 50 square kilometers of land from him and give it to him. Right? You see what I mean? What makes you do it? Practically? You do it for your lord, for your feudal lord, literally. There you have it. Today the feudal lord no longer exists, but the feudal mentality is still taught, is still taught in books written during the feudal era and which are causing damage to a nation that unfortunately doesn't read much, doesn't educate itself, doesn't open up, and. And that's it. So that's what you've seen. And when this aggression, this hatred is faced with a resignation and a passivity, a shame of literally existing that we typically find in Westerners today. Well, that's what this mixture gives explosive results that we know. There you go. It's terrible, right? It's terrible. It's children. It's nothing new, right? I have photos I can show you. I mean, in Algeria they targeted children, right? It's nothing new. In Syria they targeted children. I mean, it's not new here maybe, but it's not new in the world. There you go, my friends. I'll leave you and then I'll go home and that's it.