Ca chauffe : Medvedev menace Macron !

My friends, today there was an absolutely extraordinary statement on the official Twitter account of Russian Vice President Medev. This is what he said. He said this about Macron, and incidentally, he also said this about the German Chancellor. The Chancellor he criticizes for wanting revenge. In other words, he tells him, you haven't yet digested the defeat of the Second World War. You want revenge, we'll take care of you. And in fact, what he says about Macron and Mers is that we'll recognize them by their teeth, a way of saying that there won't be much left of them, and dental impressions will be needed to validate that soon. So what is the situation that Europe is moving towards? It's a situation of increasingly serious tension, given that this continent has already experienced two world wars, the first, the second. So talking about a Third World War in Europe is not an Odin. It is not something that unites us. I mean, if a Third World War were to occur, it would become a European tradition afterwards. So at that point, we can imagine that there would be a fourth, a fifth, and then Europe would happily embark on a slaughter every few decades. I will just give you a figure that will perhaps help you understand the gravity of the situation. Let's imagine that the Second World War had not taken place in 1945, but when we had wars in Europe, annual wars, every year, we had a war in Europe. And then these wars collectively reached or maintained the average death toll of the Second World War, which, remember, in my hypothesis, did not take place. Well, there were 80 million deaths during the Second World War. It's been 80 years since the end of World War II, roughly speaking. So we can say that it would have taken 1 million deaths per year since 1945 to reach the death toll of World War II and maintain the average deaths per war in Europe. Just a way of telling you that Europe is an extremely, extremely unstable region, okay? A very dangerous region. A region that can give the impression of stability for a while, and then after a while, plunges back into war. So the difference compared to other places is that these are not conflicts that are plotted or triggered, rather right or wanted or desired by the European population, who are generally civilized and peaceful people. So these are not people who are naturally or culturally inclined towards war, but rather by their elites. They have elites who are eager to regularly trigger major conflicts because it allows them to do so. It allows them to enrich a certain number of people. Quite simply, war is a business, right? War is not about the reasons that are given to you. These are the reasons or causes that are given to you. These are causes just for you to die. But these are not the real causes, right? The real causes are causes. We make money, we get rich, we control the market and everything. And generally, well, that's the real result, the most interesting one, let's say. So the question that many people ask themselves is, will there be a third World War in Europe? It's hard to say, it's hard to know. But what can I answer to this question that I receive quite regularly on the WhatsApp that I often use? So here's what I can tell you. If you look today, there are three countries at the forefront of the desire for war in Europe. They're very easy to list. Everyone knows them. They're the ones that bark the most. We have Macron's France. We have the United Kingdom. I don't want to say the United Kingdom with Starmer. Yes, Starmer was a warlord, but so were those who came before him. So there hasn't been a change in time. It turns out that Starmer is perhaps a bit more radical than the others. But that's not even defensible. Someone could argue the opposite, right? They'd probably be right. So the King wants to go to war. And of course we have Germany. So these three countries have something in common. All three are heading towards a panic. The United Kingdom's army is not operational. Yes, they can always send a helicopter with six guys in it and then slather themselves in shoe polish and go do a commando operation. Yes, they could do that. But in itself it's not a third World War. It's a warm up and an attack operation or even a skirmish. But it's not in itself a third world war. For a third world war. If you look at a 3945, well, it was preceded by massive armament, by training soldiers, people were heated up to white heat. And then one day it went off. Well, you had equipment, you had humans, today you had. You have neither, huh? In terms of equipment, I mean, there's no one. And on a human level too, right? Uh, France is the same. France has outsourced everything, it has sold everything. It no longer manufactures its own weapons or anything at all. So today, what is France? It is a country that can fight for three days, right? And on the morning of the fourth day, what do we do? We run away. Germany. Germany is the same. Germany is a country that is slipping into austerity, that is slipping into an economic situation like the Astros, because the Americans have cut off its cheap energy hey, you have to know one thing. I can tell you about it in another video if you want, but the United States has always modulated the economy, the European economy, right? They have always modulated it. And in particular, how? By injecting or restricting energy. Because the European economy, like any economy, is universal. Either you inject energy into it, which makes it easier to access energy. Well, it will function well, it will start producing wealth and all that. Otherwise you restrict energy either through prohibitions like the sanctions against Russia, like the Nord Stream explosion, sabotage. And then also it can be, in a way, how should I say, it can be completely ideological. You can push them to say, well, for climate reasons, carbon, etc. Like, it depends on each country, they call it differently, right? In the UK it's net zero. In other countries they call it something else. But, well, their submission, right? They hide their submission behind these stories of climate goals, when in reality they do not have the right to access energy. Remember, it was Kiney, for example, who blocked Europe's access to energy coming from the Soviet bloc. He said no. He even banned the ban where he banned large diameter pipes. He banned their sale to the Soviet bloc. Why? Because he did not want this to be able to extend a network right, to the countries of Western Europe. He did not want Western Europe to have access to cheap energy. And he pushed Western Europe. In 63, he pushed it to go towards Middle Eastern oil. And then in 73, 10 years later, he was dead. But 10 years later, Europe woke up with a gulp because of the oil crash. Do you see what I mean? So I'm just giving you this story that dates back to the past, it's more recent just to tell you that the United States has always regulated the European economy by restricting energy, right? So here's the these three countries are all on the verge of economic collapse. And on top of that, they're led by leaders who aren't particularly charismatic. I don't know. I'm asking you the question and you answer me in the comments. If Macron declared a Third World War, tomorrow, you go after him. I'm going to say, okay, Macron told me, I'm going to do it. I don't know a single guy who would do that. I don't know a single person who would do that. And I can tell you the same thing in the United Kingdom. Well, we'll always have two or three excited people, that's for sure. You'll always have two or three people who are excited. But you can't have a third World War. With two or three people who are excited. So all this is to say, will there be a third World War or not? I have the impression that there will be a collapse. More than anything else, I have the impression that there will be a collapse. It means that I have the impression that things will go badly economically because a war doesn't have to be intense for us to suffer damage. Look at inflation today, for example. That's where it comes from, inflation. Uh, because the cost of energy today, when you have a cost, when you have energy that is very expensive, because we have to bring LNG ships back from the United States, etc. Huh, it costs a lot. This cost is passed on to the energy that is used for everything. So inevitably it will create inflation. Right? So there's already inflation. A lot of businesses have already closed. There are a lot of people who have lost their jobs. Do you know what I mean? So these are the effects of a war. These are the effects of a war. You look at the United Kingdom, for example, and the speed at which it is de industrializing. Honestly, to achieve such rapid and brutal deindustrialization, you would literally have to bomb it. You would say, no bombing, no missiles falling. But despite everything, there is de industrialization every day. There are specific announcements every day in the newspaper. This company is going to close, this store is going to close 12 branches, this bank is going to close its accounts, this school has closed, and so on. So you see what I mean? It. It's equivalent to a bombing. But if there's no bombing, there's no missile. But it's equivalent. It means the damage of the war, even if the war doesn't take place. But just talking about it, we're suffering the damage. And with today's verbal escalation, that's where he said that Macron. Well, we'll identify him with his teeth. It's true that. It's true that it's something that's going in the wrong direction. There you have it. That was just my answer to the answer to the question. Thank you. Thank you for listening to this video so far and I'll see you in the next one.