Canada: la loi anti-blasphème arrive

Hello, my friends, before getting into the heart of this video, I wanted to tell you that I was extremely, I was going to say surprised, but I'm not half as surprised by the judicialization of political debate in France. This means that we already knew that intellectual debate was extremely or heavily judicialized in France. This means that more and more people are summoned before judges, have to answer to judges for things like he made a statement, he wrote a book, he drew a picture. And I think that is not the role of the state, it is not the sovereign role of the state in a democracy to interfere with what some people say, what others say. That is already astounding. But recently there has been a sort of escalation, a sort of deterioration with the summoning of Mr. Francois Fillon, Marine Le Pen and perhaps others soon to appear before the courts for certain acts. So I have no sympathy whatsoever for the acts of which he is accused. In this case, it concerns fictitious employment and the use, let's say, not very. Not very scrupulous of a certain number of funds and all that. It turns out that these accusations are founded. I have no sympathy whatsoever for these people. On the other hand, I am still surprised that they are being summoned for acts that go back a long time or that would go back a long time, that they are being summoned precisely on the eve of the presidential election. Okay? So I think that the French regime is playing a dirty game by trying to do as is done in practically all third world countries, by using the police to intimidate political opponents. Do we have to go and seek asylum abroad and then do French politics from London? It's happened before, but it's true that it's worrying in terms of police persecution. I wanted to tell you that I was extremely shocked by the case of Mr. Fran. His name is Franck Zapata, the one who created the flyboard. You know, he's a Frenchman who created an absolutely mind blowing machine. It's kind of like a skateboard, if you like. It's really small. He stands on it and it flies and he can float in the air. It's something really out of science fiction that he managed to invent, okay? And he found himself summoned before the police for it. Okay? He found himself answering for this crime of invention before the police. Photo, fingerprints, the whole thing. And in fact, I can tell you something. For someone who comes from Africa, I can tell you that the fall of a country or the fall of a civilization begins or is even consummated when inventors of the caliber of that person find themselves answering for their actions before a representative of the tide in the kitchen. He must not exceed, excuse the image not. Must not exceed that of a little monkey. I have seen it. I have seen it. For example, in Algeria, where you will find engineers, where you will find real creators, brains, rachemenes, as the Jews say, you will find them being persecuted by little people, by little morons, don't you think, who do not even have the level to understand the instructions for a microwave. Do you know what I mean? And this is particularly shocking because it is saying that in the future we must export inventors. People who have ideas, whether they are ideas on a social or scientific level, must go into exile, must come to France. By the way, you have noticed something. Most of the big companies that were started in a garage were not born in France. And most of them do not even pay taxes in France. Does that ring a bell? Because in France, we nip the snake in the bud. The creator, the inventor, must be nipped in the bud. And what happens? He leaves for the United States, becomes a multinational, arrives and sells it to you at a huge profit. He does not even pay taxes in your country. It is crazy, but it is true that a company like Apple, for example, could not have been French. He would have killed him, he would have shot him. He would have walled them up alive in their garage. I didn't even come here to talk about that, you know? Let me tell you a story. Let me tell you a story. I was a teenager. I had maybe a teenager, I don't know. I had developed a great passion for aviation at the time. And there was a guy, an Algerian. You have to know that I come from Algeria, which means practically, I mean, even the mustard, the teaspoon, is imported from abroad. I mean, we. We have nothing that is manufactured in our country, more or less. And in fact, our society is thirsty for people who are inventors, creators. We have a thirst for that kind of thing. And in fact, what happened is that there was a guy who had managed to make an airplane. Well, he didn't invent an airplane, okay? He didn't invent it. He built a plane in a country where they don't even make a spoon. Okay? Well, what happened is that it was like with Mr. Zapata. He ended up in court. He ended up in front of the police, at least. And in fact, his plane was stuck. I spoke to the pilot who flew his plane. He didn't have the right to fly it. They told him, you have the right to go on the Runway. To do an acceleration stop. You accelerate and then you brake. This pilot didn't really listen to them. He took off a meter or two from the ground and flew about a thousand meters. And then he landed again. That's it. The plane never did more than that. I saw it years later, rotting in a hangar full of pigeons and rats and all that. But that's sad. I'm sure that if this guy had been allowed to work today, he would be exporting this plane to several countries. That's how great stories start. But there are cultures where great stories have to be nipped in the bud. Sorry for the punchline. I know it must have been too much for some people. I apologize for getting carried away. Yes. I wanted to talk about other things. We're already in the middle of the video. And, you know, Canada wants to pass a law against Islamophobia. So I'm going to tell you something very honest. I'm against all forms of hatred, phobia, and tension between people, because I know that these kinds of stories often end badly. And I want to fight against these things. I want to fight against these things, but it's very difficult. Uh, Islamophobia in this case. I mean, how can you fight against it, uh, when you have terrorist groups that are going to massacre people that are selling women in cages, and you have thousands of people who support them, who give them money, who even go to join them, who arrest them every day at airports. It's true that the task. The task is very difficult. That's true. Uh, I wanted to say that Canada is trying to fight against this, against this rejection of Islam. A large and growing number of people, including in Islamic lands, in the lands where Islam is most popular, uh, are trying to fight against it with a law, a law that will literally become a law that would punish blasphemy. And this law is terrible. So I'm telling you, I'm going to give you a certain number of elements that are extremely shocking in this law. The first is that it will single out Canada. It's Canadians who want to pass this law. It has been in the works for a long time, but it is about to be finalized. It will designate Canada to the Islamist international community as a prime target, a soft target, as they say in English. That means an extremely easy target. Why? Because by passing this law, you will create the environment or ecosystem that allows the ideas of the Islamist international community to evolve without any control. Okay, Let me tell you this. I say this with the greatest respect. Okay. I will be honest with you. You are an extremely naive nation when it comes to religious wars. I do not know the details of Canada's history. That said, I do not believe that in your memory, in your experience, there is a time when religious wars have left a deep mark. I do not think, okay, I do not think that you know what you are talking about when you talk about religion. Monotheistic religions were born in the Mediterranean. Lets say around here. You get the idea. And in fact, all the wars, all the tensions caused by these religions evolved from this epicenter, but they didn't affect you. You hadn't discovered it yet. At the time, you were lucky. And in fact, today you're touching on something you're completely unaware of. You have no idea what kind of Pandora's box you're going to open with this law. That's the first point. Secondly, the second point is that Islam doesn't need laws to protect it. You know, there are laws in Islamic countries. There are. I don't know. If you go to Saudi Arabia, they could cut your head off for a few words about Islam. There are already laws, okay? That's not what Islam needs. Islam needs a reform, a profound reform. It needs to change. It needs to move forward to get out of the bloodshed in the 14th century, well, 14 centuries ago, it needed to get out of the cult of the old Arab politicians and get out and enter this world if possible. I don't think it's possible, but I'm ready to help with that. The problem with your law is that it will prohibit any reform of Islam because reform begins with criticism, with rejection. Now, with this law, you prohibit criticism. You prohibit reform. If, for example, I attack or try to destroy a hadith that says that Muslims will one day massacre all the Jews one by one, that the Jew will flee, hide behind a stone or a tree, and that the tree or the inanimate object will speak and say to the Muslims, come, there's a Jew hiding behind me. Take your sword and come and cut him down. Hadith. What I'm telling you is serious. It's a hadith. It's not an extremist hadith. It's an Islamic hadith. It's part of Islam, okay? I've never heard it rejected. It's taught in schools, in. It's taught in mosques, it's in books, okay? If I attack this hadith, will you condemn me according to your law or not? You see the thing. If I attack this hadith, I could fall foul of your law, okay? And we're going to end up with completely mind boggling cases. Like in England someone was prosecuted for criticizing the terrorist group called the Islamic State. Do you see the madness? It can lead to completely mind boggling things. There you have it. The law also decrees that extremists do not represent Islam. But what do you know about that? A form, it's a sort of sophisticated form of takfirism, in fact of excommunicating those, for example who practice jihad which is killing you, killing Muslims, literally. Which is recommended in practically every Islamic book that you open. We can play at opening. I can bring books and open them at random. I can show you. Okay. I don't know my friends. I don't know. I don't know. What can I tell you? Anyway, I'll leave you. I wish you all the best. I wish everyone lots of good vibes. But it's not always easy, is it? It's not always easy. See you soon.