Censure en Folie : le Royaume-Uni va interdire Wikipédia !

Hello, my friends, the United Kingdom is going to ban Wikipedia, or rather, Wikipedia is going to block the IP addresses of British Internet users. This is a totalitarian drift, a drift of censorship that is absolutely unprecedented in this country. Before starting this video, I would just like to apologize for the last one where the blood was absolutely appalling. I shouldn't have posted it, but. But somehow it happened. After posting this video, some people realized that I was struggling with the blood. I was contacted. I would like to thank those who help me, and that's why I can now provide you with this audio, which seems to be of good quality. We can't hear the neighbors making noise at the moment. Uh, the wind. Well, at that time, there wasn't much of it. But honestly, I would like to thank the people who helped me in the last few days to be able to provide you with good quality audio. Back to the United Kingdom, you have to know one when the health crisis hit, some countries lost more than others. Among them, the countries that were the most liberal lost much more. I'm thinking, for example, of the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. These are countries that for decades, while in other parts of the world, people didn't hesitate to pass repressive laws, censorship laws, and control laws. In fact, France, for example, at one time surpassed even China when it came to using the police or the courts to suppress online discourse. Countries like the United Kingdom, as I was saying, lost a lot. Why? Because countries with a totalitarian tradition were ultimately in their comfort zone during the health crisis. So they got through that period and then they got out of it. And then we go back to before. That's not the case in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom, once it had a taste of totalitarianism, it had a taste of arbitrariness, it had a taste of extrajudicial measures. Well, today it has developed a kind of thirst, a completely unhealthy appetite for this kind of thing, and it's fully into it. So there's a law that has just been passed. It actually dates back to before we jumped to conclusions and said, yeah, look at the left and everything. Because we know that the labor left came to power in the UK in 2024, but it's not really. It's not really on the table of that left. It was rather the conservative right that had put this law in place, and it's only now that it comes into effect. So it's a law that will create a completely disproportionate liability for sites that distribute content. So in particular, it needs to ensure what is called the protection of children. When you know the history of the UK and what has been happening in this country for decades, it's true that the protection of children rings much more false than it would in other parts of the world. So with this pretext, which is really a pretext for control and censorship, we started to classify websites according to categories. Category 1 is the category of sites that have a lot of visitors, so they have to check that these are the people who write on them, the people who edit them. Wikipedia is an open source encyclopedia. Hey, I myself have created Wikipedia articles that were subsequently edited by other people that I don't know. I myself have sometimes corrected facts on Wikipedia. So it is an open encyclopedia. It clearly falls under the law because, you know, the encyclopedia has to know who is there, who reads, who accesses, but also who edits. When we say know who, we mean asking for people's passports, asking for a selfie, asking for their address, all that. So in fact, we are moving towards an Internet by Internet system where we are forced to log in, you know, with an identity document to go online. It is a disaster for freedom of expression. So Wikipedia, of course realized that this is completely contrary to its model, that there is no way it can maintain its model of an open encyclopedia, which can be edited by anonymous people, among others, and also accessed by anonymous people if they have to maintain a huge file with people's passports, little identities. And so they have taken legal action against this law. There is a hearing next week and all that. But in reality, I don't think they will go too far in this direction. So what Wikipedia is going to do is to become a Category 2 site, not a Category 1 site. In that case, what it needs to do is to create a quota that means restricting access to its site to British people. That means very few British people would have to be able to access its site. In that case, what it could do is release a quota of access each day, and then once it's reached, it would prohibit the next person from accessing it. Uh, the United Kingdom, I'll tell you something pretty crazy. Uh, you should know that, for example, a few months ago they banned Apple from providing advanced cryptography for data stored in the cloud, cloud backups for iPhones. So in Afghanistan, the Afghans, the Taliban, for example, have better protection of their data than the British. I was in the United States last January. I bought an iPhone, I arrived in the United Kingdom. I landed at the airport. He connects there, he gives me a message saying that he should he should deactivate, there is no choice. And that he is going to deactivate the advanced protection of the data. And this of course jeopardizes the security of all users. So today I left the United Kingdom. I no longer live there, of course, for the reasons that I am describing to you. That is part of the reasons. It means I did not go to the United Kingdom to see a country that is sinking into poverty, into confiscatory taxation, into violence, the collapse of public services that never really existed and all that. And on top of that, totalitarianism, cameras everywhere, the police, surveillance. I did not go to this country originally. That means if the UK were the way it is today, I would never have immigrated there in 2008. I would never have left for that country. So I reviewed my position regarding my presence in that country. I decided to get out of it. The problem is that today, for example, I couldn't change the address on my iPhone. I couldn't put another one in another country. Why? Because I have to deactivate all my subscriptions, all that. There are a lot of things to do before I can change my address with Apple. So I'm going to create another Apple id, all that. I'm working on it. But gradually I also have to leave the UK digitally, even if I've left physically. Another thing, another thing too is that since there is a lot of pressure on migration, because you have to know that the British were told to vote for Brexit so we can control our borders. Well, what happened is that once we controlled our borders, so to speak, it allowed the country to enter a post border era. That means that in reality me migrants arrive every day and are housed. We have our first billionaire in the housing of migrants. A billionaire who by the way, is not a tax resident in the United Kingdom. You have to know that there are some very strange things going on in this country. For example, we're going to see water supply companies, parking supply companies, all sorts of companies that actually control essential things in the country, but which are abroad, right? We can have investment funds so that whoever buys everything so that the British, for example, to park in the country of their ancestors, they have to pay an Australian investment fund, for example. Do you see what I mean? So what's happening is that there's a lot of tension, there's a lot of social tension because people see that everything has been cut off. For example, retirees who couldn't afford their heating. Well, their heating subsidies have been taken away. There are retirees who have just received tax forms for the first time in history. In the meantime, there's a collapse in the labor industries that have been overtaxed. Car production is at its lowest since 1953. So that means that the jobs they use to create are disappearing or becoming more precarious and at the same time, working, bringing in migrants who are being put in hotels for £600 a night. £600 is literally €700. €700 a night in hotels in central London. And then we're going to cordon off the neighborhoods with police checkpoints. Whereas in other parts of the country, when we call the police about a crime, no one comes. They tell us, well, you go online, you look on the portal, you fill in the form, you file a complaint on the portal, and we'll see a text message with a crime reference. That's it. There's nothing else. So really, there's tension building in the country. And on the other hand, what the authorities are saying today, what they are announcing, is that we are going to put police officers in charge of monitoring the Internet, of monitoring sentiment. I mean, the police are not there to monitor sentiment. The police are there to enforce the law. The police are there to fight crime. Today, the police are being withdrawn from crime while the country is sinking into all forms of crime in order to free up the police to do things like create opinion, to commit crimes of opinion. And that is once again a deviation. But literally, this kind of story happens every day. It happens every day. I look at this country and I think to myself, it's almost like ptsd. I look at this country and I think to myself, thankfully, this news that I am reading is not my news. Of course. I feel bad for the country I lived in. I feel bad for my friends who are still there. I feel bad for the good people who still live in this country who are really suffering from a state that has become the enemy. I won't hide from you that somewhere I said, the state has become the enemy. In fact, we've known each other for quite some time. You know, the Fursonian tendencies. I consider the state to be the predator and the natural enemy of the population. Whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, the state is the enemy. For me, a broke state, a poor state, a state that doesn't have the means is the best possible and imaginable state. Because the more money a state has, the more laws there are that give it power and the more it will use its power against the population. And once this state is also co opted by the forces of money, when it is co opted by companies, by economic interests, by banks, by ideological interests. Then inevitably you have a state that has the right, as they say, to legitimate violence. And then it will use it against you for the benefit of the people who are behind it, who are manipulating it. The Marxist side that I also have. So, I mean we are talking among ourselves. We tell me that the state is a kind of administration or a kind of entity that is there to serve the interests of the ruling classes. The state is not there to serve you remember the last time the state served you. So the state is there to serve the ruling classes. The ruling classes today are a hyper class. It is not even 1%. I am not even talking to you about the guy who drives a Jaguar. I am talking to you about a real BORM000. And in the interest of this, the state is taking action. It is becoming or has become or has always been a great seed, absolutely without the slightest control. In any case, my friends, this is a story that we are going to follow. Now I can tell you one thing. On the revolutionary level, there are many revolutions that have broken out in the past. There are plenty of them in the history books. And yet it was a time when there was not even the Internet. So the states that believe they are going down tyrannical, authoritarian, freedom destroying paths, telling themselves that they will just have to control the Internet to put us in peace, are completely wrong. There is no need for the Internet. There is a collective consciousness. It is a consciousness that connects people to each other despite everything. And it doesn't go through a network, it doesn't go through an access provider. And at some point there's a critical level of collective dissatisfaction and then it can tip over. So there you have it. In any case, I hope you'll enjoy the sound of this video. Thanks to those who were generous and understanding in the last one. I'm showing you my book Escrow Logi on Amazon in Kindle format or paperback. The reason I'm telling you about it is that it has a chapter on junk food, insect food and all that while in France. We're being told today that companies that wanted to feed the French vermin are going bankrupt, which is a very good thing. I explain the mechanisms in this book. Thank you for watching this far in the next one. And by the way, for those who stayed until the Last minute, at 8:00pm Paris time, there's a live on Patreon. This live exceptionally is open to all subscribers, including free subscribers. So it's a live that's done on Zoom, which allows us to be a little more relaxed in terms of exchanges and all that. And so, for those who want to subscribe to my Patreon, you don't even need to pay to access the Zoom link. See you soon.