Charlie Kirk : les Antifa bientot classés organisation terroriste ?

Good evening, my friends. Is Trump going to ban the anti fascist movement? In other words, is he going to declare it a terrorist organization? Let me tell you something, if he doesn't do it now, if he doesn't take advantage of it, I mean that in the noble sense of the word, because as you know, politics is also a question of opportunity. There are things that can happen at a certain time that might be a little more difficult at another. Today he really has an absolutely perfect window of opportunity which makes it possible to ban the anti fascists, but which makes it necessary to ban them. I'll tell you why. Because these movements that have dragged America down at every level, that have corrupted the university system, the administration, the justice system, well, today we can't touch them if they are not declared a terrorist organization. They are supported, they continue to be supported. So let me tell you, for many years it was usaid, ah, usaid, that paid them money. It was also companies, sometimes through rather special mechanisms. For example, in 2008, there were a lot of banks and financial institutions that were fined heavily following the crisis, as you know, because the crisis revealed that there had been a lot of embezzlement, there had been a lot of trafficking and laws that were not respected. And so inevitably, institutions found themselves under the influence of justice. Well, what happened is that Obama had allowed banks to pay less money if they paid nonprofit organizations. In other words, they were told, you are fined $200 million. On the other hand, the fine will be reduced to 50 million if you pay this money to non profit institutions for the company. Well, it saves 150 million, saves even more in reality, because it can remove this expense from its balance sheet. So it will be tax exempt. And in addition, it allows it to increase its score. For Obama, it was, it was also a nice thing because it allowed it to obtain funding for these organizations, very often the most radical, without having to go through traditional state funding channels, which are more complicated, which have a certain number of locks, which are a little bit not impossible, but which would require more work than forcing the hand of companies, which means condemning them and at the same time offering them a path to its organizations. And there you have it. It's great. So the US has been blocking US funds from the Trump administration since its arrival, particularly with the help of the. Now, how do these organizations find themselves? Well, they find themselves in difficulty. Not all their funds or financing are gone. Yes, but some of the funds are still there. And today we have people who have been showered with dollars for years and years, who have been allowed to organize and arm themselves. They have been defended on every level. We even have laws written to protect them. And so inevitably today, well, they are taking action. If we look at the last few years. And again, I'm being moderate, I'm not telling you everything. I really think simply because as long as these organizations are not declared terrorist organizations, they remain largely protected. So in the case that interests us, the assassination of Charlie KK today we have Vance, the American vice president who spoke and he talked about using words like terrorism. These are words from the vice president's mouth that don't just come out of nowhere. Something is probably brewing because if he says it, he's calling them, he's calling the assassins terrorists and all that, and he's also indirectly calling their financiers. Soros quotes him as saying that through his open society, you know, the idle billionaires who have a lot of tax free money. He talks about it. JV well, they can absolutely, and this is our problem today, by the way. They can completely bypass all democratic mechanisms and start pouring money everywhere. And then since we live in an era of widespread corruption, money can buy everything. You can buy tailor made laws, you can buy science through scientific studies, so to speak, that are delivered tailor made with perfect results for the person giving the order. You can buy political parties and so on. So there are no limits to what money can do. Someone like Bill Gates, for example, is received as a head of state even though he represents no one. He gives his opinion on social policies, health policies and so on. I mean, in what capacity? It's just like, I have money, I land my private jet, you send me bikers and I come and give you lessons. I sign a check. Soros is the same precisely through his organization, the Open Society. And of course, these are nonprofit organizations, but when you look at them closely, they are very often a system with investments that bring in a lot of money, but not in a context that makes them tax free. It's just a way to avoid paying taxes and also to get subsidies and all that and to influence society as we are. So today the only option left for Trump is to declare Antifa and other similar or affiliated organizations as terrorist organizations. They have committed a huge number of attacks so far. The attack on Charlie Coroner is truly the most visible and the most visible one, the one that affected America the most, because it was a wake up call. There have been other crimes in the past. There have been other crimes this year, last year, the year before, that could have, that should have caused just as much of a Wake up call. But unfortunately, for various reasons, including the media, which had hushed things up. Because the media, you have to know, have a lot of sympathy for these organizations. And what they do is they always try to hushed up their crimes until they reach a level where it is no longer something that can be hidden. In other times, Charlie Cork's assassination would have passed without a hitch. It wouldn't have been talked about much. It would have been a little blurb in the Winter Girls section on page three, and then we would have moved on to something else. Except that now it exploded. It exploded worldwide. And so there was no way to hide it. If you look at the reaction of the crowd in the United States, I think we have to compare it. I won't go into details. That's not the doubt in the video. But if you look closely, you can compare it to the concept of martyrdom. You look at martyrdom, which tells you that just because someone died a violent death doesn't mean they're a martyr. You know, it's not just like that, but there are a certain number of criteria that make a person a martyr in the collective imagination or consciousness. If you look at Charlie C. He's becoming an icon, isn't he? For Americans, there are certain characteristics. The fact that he went into danger when he was aware of it. The fact that he's considered someone who is innocent, so to speak, in the sense that he's not. Of course, from a Christian perspective, no human being is innocent, but we understand each other. He's simply someone who wasn't carrying weapons, who wasn't at war. He was someone who just went out to talk, to dialogue, to change and all of that, if you like, with the notion of injustice. His wife and children losing him. There are a lot of criteria that make a person able to achieve the iconography, if you like, of a martyr. And so all of these characteristics are fulfilled today. Hence this reaction, let's say, of the American public. Another reaction that we've seen is that people are being fired from their jobs for having praised this act of God. What does that mean? It means that the left invented what is called cancel culture. And for years they were hunting down conservatives and quite often managed to dox them with their employers and then get them fired, knowing that companies are afraid. Companies among us have absolutely no value. A company that states its values, that makes me laugh. There is no value. Your value is money. Your heart beats for money, and that's it. They represent capital, nothing else. But they like to display a certain virtue that changes according to the seasons, according to opportunities, according to which way the wind blows, where the market is selling, or the public's reaction. So normally it was the left that invented the cultural left, the Democratic left that invented cancel culture, except that today it is getting a taste of it because a lot of companies are getting rid of collaborators, employees who had congratulated themselves, sometimes even on LinkedIn and sometimes on other social networks, saying, well, well, that's great, and all that. And so now, and to be honest, it shocks me and it would have shocked me in the same way if the dead man had been, for example, from the opposite side, if it had been a Democrat, a Democratic debater, a Democratic intellectual who had come to a university, after all, it's a sacred university who had come to discuss, exchange ideas and defend these theories as hazy as they were. And someone, being a Republican, had shot him, killed him, and other Republicans were congratulating themselves playfully. He found it extremely shocking. So I'm not coming at you with a two tier or variable morality. It's really the principle, the very concept of having someone right, regardless of their political leanings, who comes to a university to discuss and they get shot down. People applaud. And we have, for example, as I told you in the United Kingdom, we have even the head of the president, right, of the, of the, of the, of the Oxford Students Union who debated with Charlie Kiss, who openly welcomed his assassination. And the university is behind him. The university supports him by saying, well, listen, if you have something to say, if you're racist, there you go. That gives you an idea of how far the Royamini has fallen. The Royamini is yet another chapter, I believe, more in the United States in the sense that the Americans, it's true that they sometimes experience downturns, but they have, I have the impression they have this ability to bounce back. There are, in their system, in their culture, in their institutions, there are also the occasional downfalls, but there are also the ups and downs of a resurrection, which is something that European countries don't have. Unfortunately, European countries are always sliding in the same direction, that is downwards. In any case, we'll see what will happen in the hours and days to come. But in any case, if the Trump administration does not declare Antifa, don't declare Soros, Open Society and other affiliated organizations as terrorist organizations, which means that defending them would be an apology for terrorism. Financing them would be a form of terrorism. If he doesn't do that, he will have missed a real opportunity to do so and an absolutely historic opportunity. And well, if he doesn't do it, he probably will do it at the next massacre, because these people aren't going to stop anytime soon. They're not going to calm down, are they? That's for sure. Thank you, my friends, for watching this video up to this point. I'll remind you at the last second of the video, as a good reader that I am, I'll remind you of my book Scam, which is available on Amazon in Kindle or paperback format. I'll try, if possible, to offer it in audio format one day.